Ten Pound Poms
- TV Series
- 2023–
IMDb RATING
6.8/10
2.3K
YOUR RATING
A group of Brits leave post-war Britain in 1956 to embark on an adventure. The Roberts family tries to make the best of their situation, but life at the shelter tests them, but they're not t... Read allA group of Brits leave post-war Britain in 1956 to embark on an adventure. The Roberts family tries to make the best of their situation, but life at the shelter tests them, but they're not the only ones avoiding the truth.A group of Brits leave post-war Britain in 1956 to embark on an adventure. The Roberts family tries to make the best of their situation, but life at the shelter tests them, but they're not the only ones avoiding the truth.
- Awards
- 2 wins & 2 nominations total
Browse episodes
Summary
Reviewers say 'Ten Pound Poms' delves into migration, cultural clashes, and British immigrants' struggles in 1950s Australia. Criticisms include historical inaccuracies, over-dramatization, and modern issues in a historical context. Acting and production values receive praise, though some find characters and storylines shallow. The show's portrayal of Australian society and sensitive topics like racism and sexism garner mixed reactions. Despite criticisms, many reviewers show interest in a potential second season.
Featured reviews
If I had to summarize my experience of watching 'Ten Pound Poms' so far I would have to say that Danny Brocklehurst was determined to work his story around xenophobia and racism, and chose the Labour Camp outside Sydney as his best way to integrate those themes, as it brought many races closer together. Unfortunately, it makes the story flat as every day we see Terry going off to do his bit in a hole in the ground, and in the evening he gets together with the other immigrants for a drink or party. It's a generalization of course, but many members of the Maltese side of my family went to Australia at this time and they ended up in the big cities. I think this makes the whole story seem untrue. There may have been one of two places that were like the camp, but they were probably the exception rather than the rule and this is where this story falls flat for me.
The production values, acting, scoring, cinematography are all world class. It's just that the story falls flat, it is too crowded, and the characters are not three dimensional enough. I will make an exception for the Terry character, and I think the Michelle Keegan character could have been worked better. The orphanage scene was embarrassing and unconvincing.
I think the subject material needed a more sensitive approach and probably should have come from someone with more first jhand experience of the process of emigration.
The production values, acting, scoring, cinematography are all world class. It's just that the story falls flat, it is too crowded, and the characters are not three dimensional enough. I will make an exception for the Terry character, and I think the Michelle Keegan character could have been worked better. The orphanage scene was embarrassing and unconvincing.
I think the subject material needed a more sensitive approach and probably should have come from someone with more first jhand experience of the process of emigration.
In the 60's most large establishments had switchboard operators , like Hotels and Hospitals . To make an overseas phone call you would call the international operator , give them the country and phone number and the operator would call back when call was connected . This series was set in 1956 . From the 40's and onwards everyone had Radios for music and entertainment as well as for the BBC news and Cricket . Throughout this series no one had a radio . Radios were as popular then as mobile phones are as popular today . Steven Curry was completely outstanding as J. J. plus all the main character child actors were really good .
Not an unforgettable drama or a terrible one, somewhere in the middle. One of those shows where you should probably bail if the characters and storyline in the first episode don't grab you.
It had decent production values, with a few sound and lighting wobbles and a solid ensemble cast. Michelle Keegan's character felt a bit far-fetched in some of her endeavours, but fans will no doubt forgive her. One of its strengths was the number of strong female characters.
If you get on board with the first episode stay with it, if you don't jump ship as it continues along the same path.
On the downside there was a lot of heavy-handed messaging that didn't need to be there.
It had decent production values, with a few sound and lighting wobbles and a solid ensemble cast. Michelle Keegan's character felt a bit far-fetched in some of her endeavours, but fans will no doubt forgive her. One of its strengths was the number of strong female characters.
If you get on board with the first episode stay with it, if you don't jump ship as it continues along the same path.
On the downside there was a lot of heavy-handed messaging that didn't need to be there.
Good show well acted story was good . I think people may find it interesting especially if they had parents from Britain that immigrated after ww2 . No jobs in Britain after ww2 many people immigrated to Australia the advertisements made it seem like a dream . But not so much the reality .
Poverty and discrimination face the the new arrivals . The brochure didn't say they be faced with the harsh realities .
In the end it's about community and making friends and talking everyone wants to work and have job and get along .
I would recommend this to anyone who likes good writing , interesting characters , and Australia .
Poverty and discrimination face the the new arrivals . The brochure didn't say they be faced with the harsh realities .
In the end it's about community and making friends and talking everyone wants to work and have job and get along .
I would recommend this to anyone who likes good writing , interesting characters , and Australia .
The first episode starts very well then it takes a nose dive. The cinematography and acting is superb, it is let down by a very weak script. Other reviews call it 'soap opera' drama and I tend to agree.
The writers had an amazing opportunity here to write a period drama delving in to the issues of the time. Instead we get a bloated over dramatic 'modern show' with nothing new.
If this is renewed for a 2nd season. I hope they tighten up the story focus on fewer characters giving the audience a chance to become invested. And for god sake leave the modern drama tropes behind. There is reality tv for that.
The writers had an amazing opportunity here to write a period drama delving in to the issues of the time. Instead we get a bloated over dramatic 'modern show' with nothing new.
If this is renewed for a 2nd season. I hope they tighten up the story focus on fewer characters giving the audience a chance to become invested. And for god sake leave the modern drama tropes behind. There is reality tv for that.
Did you know
- TriviaLots of linguistic anachronisms. For example, in Episode 1 the word striker is used to describe a football forward, this term emerged in the 1970's and in Episode 2 someone uses the exclamation "Oh my days" which, although first noted in the late 19th century, was virtually unheard and only became commonplace in the 21st century.
- GoofsApart from a pipeline that never seemed to advance, in the background was clearly shown a yellow mini articulated dumpster (used by the crew?) that was not used in Australia for another fifty years.
- How many seasons does Ten Pound Poms have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Jauna dzīve par desmit mārciņām
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content