The story depicts two protagonists tangled in jealousy, murder, betrayal across multiple timelines. Their survival quest unravels a dark mystery, leading to an inescapable trap. A noir-inspi... Read allThe story depicts two protagonists tangled in jealousy, murder, betrayal across multiple timelines. Their survival quest unravels a dark mystery, leading to an inescapable trap. A noir-inspired storyline with an original twist.The story depicts two protagonists tangled in jealousy, murder, betrayal across multiple timelines. Their survival quest unravels a dark mystery, leading to an inescapable trap. A noir-inspired storyline with an original twist.
Ingvar Sigurdsson
- Issac Revchenko
- (as Ingvar Eggert Sigurðsson)
Ian Attard
- Terrance
- (as Ian Keir Attard)
Featured reviews
8fedc
Pretty good. Clearly super low budget but I enjoyed it, nice ending too.
Not being a professional critic I'm sure I missed some of the finer details but its a thriller that delivers on that front.
I thought the beginning was a bit slow but it picks up quite a bit after the first 20 minutes or so.
The acting was OK (I'm being generous) but forgivable considering how clear it is that corners had to be cut to make it to the end.
Overall, it was a decent rental that delivered what I expected. You wont be blown away with special affects and first class acting but I don't regret seeing it.
Not being a professional critic I'm sure I missed some of the finer details but its a thriller that delivers on that front.
I thought the beginning was a bit slow but it picks up quite a bit after the first 20 minutes or so.
The acting was OK (I'm being generous) but forgivable considering how clear it is that corners had to be cut to make it to the end.
Overall, it was a decent rental that delivered what I expected. You wont be blown away with special affects and first class acting but I don't regret seeing it.
Great cinematography, with a dark plot set to explode and confuse you along the way. A bit to much driving around in a few parts of the film but well thought, could have done with a nice car chase but hey budget was tight and it worked out okay in the end. Good acting from the cast with a well thought out plot. Looking forward to seeing the evolution of his next films. The dark theme contrasted with the back drops of London, which was nice to see. Some parts were a tad bit violent but added to the suspense. Unsure why there are some bad reviews as it was thoroughly enjoyed by all of us ignore the bad remarks and make another. Keep the cameras rolling.
Not nearly as good as the poster claims. A bit hit and miss throughout and barks more than bites. One of those films I would have completely forgotten about, if indeed I had not noted it down.
When asked why I enjoyed this film so much I would say its charmingly grim atmosphere. I am struck by its mood-feeling of solitude and claustrophobia and yet paradoxically it takes place in London, one of the biggest and the most populous cities in Europe.
Its absence of top Hollywood stars is even an advantage. We expect such actors to play particular roles, but here it's different - for precisely this reason you look at the movie without preconception and get on with enjoying the puzzle. With Isaac and Ian (Ingvar Eggert Sigurðsson and Kenny Doughty) you can sense the fear, not of undefeatable heroes or immortal supermen, just people pushed to the limit. At the same time, the behavior of these characters gives the hint that they are not what they appeared to be at the beginning. With his craggy look and a natural performance, Ingvar was especially convincing to me. Joseph (Mark Womack), with an expressive manner, brings even darker balance to the script.
Here's bit of sad news - I missed seeing London crowds in the main storyline. To my eye, insignificant details like chatting couples or .. even a stray dog, that would have created a little more realism. On the other hand wasteful scenes and people don't work for me with a predominantly grim plot. What I did find frustrating was the unexplained bits. Why for example did it seem that Sophia(Sónia Balacó) plays the role of an ingénue as well as someone very shy? What was the origin of hatred between Carmichael and his father? There are hints but not quite enough.
Although once into the film you get to know who is who, paradoxically there is also some sort of unpredictability, and the final scenes are a surprise. Not only that, there are other turning points in store and an unexpected twist. Genuinely, I against I is pretty atmospheric (the action takes place at night) and in all likelihood it is not a likely film for fans of blockbusters or so-called epic movies that include spectacular explosions, millions of casualties etc. In this story there are no winners in spite of appearances. If you want to look at London in a slightly different way than usual, try I against I .
Its absence of top Hollywood stars is even an advantage. We expect such actors to play particular roles, but here it's different - for precisely this reason you look at the movie without preconception and get on with enjoying the puzzle. With Isaac and Ian (Ingvar Eggert Sigurðsson and Kenny Doughty) you can sense the fear, not of undefeatable heroes or immortal supermen, just people pushed to the limit. At the same time, the behavior of these characters gives the hint that they are not what they appeared to be at the beginning. With his craggy look and a natural performance, Ingvar was especially convincing to me. Joseph (Mark Womack), with an expressive manner, brings even darker balance to the script.
Here's bit of sad news - I missed seeing London crowds in the main storyline. To my eye, insignificant details like chatting couples or .. even a stray dog, that would have created a little more realism. On the other hand wasteful scenes and people don't work for me with a predominantly grim plot. What I did find frustrating was the unexplained bits. Why for example did it seem that Sophia(Sónia Balacó) plays the role of an ingénue as well as someone very shy? What was the origin of hatred between Carmichael and his father? There are hints but not quite enough.
Although once into the film you get to know who is who, paradoxically there is also some sort of unpredictability, and the final scenes are a surprise. Not only that, there are other turning points in store and an unexpected twist. Genuinely, I against I is pretty atmospheric (the action takes place at night) and in all likelihood it is not a likely film for fans of blockbusters or so-called epic movies that include spectacular explosions, millions of casualties etc. In this story there are no winners in spite of appearances. If you want to look at London in a slightly different way than usual, try I against I .
10k-wojas
A couple of 1 star reviews given, so amongst the worst films ever made. And a 10 star review, so amongst the best ever films. Mmmm. Probably somewhere in the middle. Good points, cinematography is great, and there is a dark ambiance and mood to the film, it's not immediately obvious what is gong to happen, but it does confuse at times. Bad points, acting not so great, and maybe too much driving in cars. Also, is a bit tough to like he characters or care for them. I can think of loads of worse films, but I can also think of loads of better ones too. I recently saw The Master, and this film is nowhere near that, but is better than a film called The Covenant that I saw on DVD recently.
Did you know
- TriviaJames Marquand (Co-Writer and Co-Director) is the son of Richard Marquand, Director the Return of the Jedi and Jagged Edge. He was offered to Direct an episode of the Star Wars TV series after George Lucas viewed his debut film Dead Man's Cards.
Details
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $1,280
- Runtime1 hour 24 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content