2000 Mules

The information presented in this film is most likely not supporting the claim of wide spread election fraud. Several aspects may not be false/fake but are interpreted in an incorrect manner. It may be true that someone visits locations of ballet boxes multiple times or drops several ballets at once. It does not prove election fraud (see available fact checking) the data has simply been (ab)used to build a conspiracy.

This film says there were 400,000 muled ballots. Which were actually valid signed ballots from real people but carried to drop boxes by thousands of mules - instead of being mailed, they don't say why. Which they say makes them illegal votes, which is flat wrong because they're still valid and from that real person. And nothing on why none of these thousands of mules have been heard from. Or the thousands of people working in the places they got the ballots. Which they say are like nursing homes and community shelters, who somehow tricked hundreds of thousands of residents into voting for Biden. I watched the whole thing, kinda, but quit trying to believe it even before I quit trying to understand it. Neither one is exactly easy.

So what are they telling us? The Arizona woman doesn't actually say that anything criminal happened. Ballot transport there was legal until recently and no dates are mentioned, go figure. The camera videos are nothing even though the speaker says it's all suspicious. He says the geo tracking is suspicious too but they never follow up with anybody real. Just suspicion, suspicion, suspicion without proof. And lots of drama acting. What they said about them solving murders turns out to be a lie. I think it's all a lie.

The supposed "geolocation" data is absolutely crucial to the film's claims.

But the idea that it could locate anyone at a drop box is ridiculous. Best case accuracy is 16', in an open field. The phone in your hand shows you a little better is because it joins in the processing - not the case for any of the film's data. In fact they only claimed 100' accuracy when they sent info to the Georgia authorities. Totally useless.

No supposed mule's phone is ever shown to be near any box.

The "geolocation analyst" is Gregg Phillips, who has no credentials or expertise in that field. He refuses to divulge his method as a "trade secret". He called journalists questioning him on it "terrorists". His claims of using a university supercomputer appear to be false. He promised to release his data but at the ballyhooed "Ripcord" event said... he had lost it all.

So all he actually has are his statements (i.e. Nothing) and the dummy video display mock-ups.

Phillips is notorious for simply claiming that millions of illegals had voted in 2016. No proof ever. Trump set up a task force to investigate this. It silently shut down 6 months later having found none. So... a massive falsehood on the public stage.

Why on earth would anyone believe Phillips about this now? Just because... you want to?

This film essentially concocts a spy-movie plot, finds video clips that seem to support bits and pieces of that, and whips it into a gigantic conspiracy theory. And presents that to the viewer as "proven".

Look at the faked multi-dropbox scenes. Look at the faked dropbox screens (one in Moscow). Look at the unverified cellphone pattern charts. Look at the undated and therefore worthless whistleblower scene. Look at the innocent voters simply being called "criminals" by the panel! Listen to the unsupported fantasizing about "non-profits" victimizing hundreds of thousands of people.

Why do we have films like this? Late last year, when asked by an associate why he keeps pushing the Steal, Trump said: "It keeps my base motivated, and will help Republicans win".

So people like D'Souza and Phillips here are in demand. They can knock out conspiracy theory films like this on command, convincing countless people that their national election was stolen.