IMDb RATING
4.3/10
1.1K
YOUR RATING
An FBI agent with time-bending powers must fight sinister forces from the future to save her loved ones from being erased from existence.An FBI agent with time-bending powers must fight sinister forces from the future to save her loved ones from being erased from existence.An FBI agent with time-bending powers must fight sinister forces from the future to save her loved ones from being erased from existence.
- Awards
- 3 wins total
Ali Durham
- Sally Jo Biggs
- (as Alesandra Durham)
K. Danor Gerald
- Jerry
- (as Danor Gerald)
Alix Maria Taulbee
- Trudy
- (as Alix Taulbee)
- …
Christopher Robin Miller
- Scrooge
- (as Christopher Miller)
Featured reviews
I don't review movies often, mostly because I'm lazy and don't want to take the time.
However, after reading so many negative and almost hateful reviews, I wanted to leave something else.
This isn't a 'great' film, but I found it intriguing and even a little emotional.
A few keys to remember as you watch:
1: Its a LOW BUDGET film. I'd be willing to bet, it was a labor of love for those involved.
2: Its an art film of sorts. What does this mean? That its ending is sort of open.
3: Some people aren't making the big bucks as actors for a reason, but it doesn't mean they're bad.
There is a story that slowly unfolds before you. A person who changes and fights against everything to change her future, anyway she can.
If you can't get past the budget and lower grade actors, then stop watching and give up. You've set higher standards than this film can live up too.
Personally, I've always had the ability to look past actors I don't like, to enjoy a movie. Sometimes, I just want to get lost in a story and I did with this one.
Kristy C
However, after reading so many negative and almost hateful reviews, I wanted to leave something else.
This isn't a 'great' film, but I found it intriguing and even a little emotional.
A few keys to remember as you watch:
1: Its a LOW BUDGET film. I'd be willing to bet, it was a labor of love for those involved.
2: Its an art film of sorts. What does this mean? That its ending is sort of open.
3: Some people aren't making the big bucks as actors for a reason, but it doesn't mean they're bad.
There is a story that slowly unfolds before you. A person who changes and fights against everything to change her future, anyway she can.
If you can't get past the budget and lower grade actors, then stop watching and give up. You've set higher standards than this film can live up too.
Personally, I've always had the ability to look past actors I don't like, to enjoy a movie. Sometimes, I just want to get lost in a story and I did with this one.
Kristy C
Apparently, TIME RUNNERS took many years to get made. You wonder why all the effort, because this turns out to be a very ordinary movie, one whose admittedly interesting premise is ruined by a dreadful, TV movie-style execution which makes the whole thing look and feel cheesy. It feels like a rip-off of TIMECOP, except with the action heroes of that film replaced by a pregnant housewife trying to solve the mystery of her husband's death.
This housewife has a special ability, which is to rewind time by five seconds, something that comes in very handy during some fun fight scenes that are interspersed throughout. Sadly, the interest level remains low, thanks to some VERY cheesy performances, particularly the guy with the exaggerated British accent who made me cringe every time he spoke. The special effects are on par with your average SyFy Channel movie, leaving this a disappointing "could have been" viewing experience.
This housewife has a special ability, which is to rewind time by five seconds, something that comes in very handy during some fun fight scenes that are interspersed throughout. Sadly, the interest level remains low, thanks to some VERY cheesy performances, particularly the guy with the exaggerated British accent who made me cringe every time he spoke. The special effects are on par with your average SyFy Channel movie, leaving this a disappointing "could have been" viewing experience.
95ers: ECHOES is an ambitious, ultra low budget sci-fi flick. (I think some of the reviewers out there might be expecting a big budget epic or something, and are disappointed when they see how indie it is.) It's an extremely original time travel tale... with an interesting Christmassy ghost story thread. The acting is decent, and the effects are surprisingly good for an indie movie. The only complaint one might have is the pacing. It's a bit slow here and there, but after a second viewing you realize how much detail is packed into the scenes. There are plenty of cool payoffs if you stick around until the end. It's different approach to time travel--lots of quantum physics stuff for science geeks. If you liked Memento and Frequency, and especially if you have a penchant for X-Files, you'll like 95ers. You can tell it's set the stage for future movies, with lots of unanswered questions and interesting characters that are part of the back story. Despite the pacing, I have to give it a ten for good writing and for what they achieved on such a tiny budget. Very much worth a patient watch.
It starts like it's recapping the previous episode in a crazy sci fi series, trying to bring you up to speed. It actually highlights some of the events in the movie itself. Really??
Usual problem here - writer/director. No one to question or query his grand vision. Desperately needed in such a potentially complex story.
Initially, some of the voices sound like they've been dubbed. And there are some brilliant(!) shots of actors talking with their mouths covered by various objects. One can only assume the writer/director was trying to plug holes in the plot by explanations. Maybe he was listening to someone. Unfortunately, not enough.
The direction/editing is poor in many places and really flags it as amateur/low budget. And there are some poor casting choices.
Some of the dialogue is just off plot and character. At one point it descends into totally incongruous family argument.
The whole plot is very convoluted, confused and unclear. You could be half way through the movie before you understand who everyone is and what's going on. And even 2/3rds of the way through, it's still confusing.
Of course, being a time travel movie, there are the inevitable anomalies. Unfortunately, there are a few glaring ones. It's not a suspension of disbelief thing, but the way time and time travel is supposed to work in the movie - it varies to support the plot.
There is a sort of twist or two but by this time you're probably not bothered and the attempt at the twisty reveal thing at the end was so predictable.
And the music jars terribly. Some of it's just really annoying but most of the time it's waaaaaay over the top. Oh, writer/director and composer have the same surname. Nepotism, perhaps?
The result is a bitty, scrappy, movie that does no favours for anyone, especially time travel fans. The subject matter alone gives it a second star but time travel fans will miss nothing (but a poor movie) by giving this a miss.
Usual problem here - writer/director. No one to question or query his grand vision. Desperately needed in such a potentially complex story.
Initially, some of the voices sound like they've been dubbed. And there are some brilliant(!) shots of actors talking with their mouths covered by various objects. One can only assume the writer/director was trying to plug holes in the plot by explanations. Maybe he was listening to someone. Unfortunately, not enough.
The direction/editing is poor in many places and really flags it as amateur/low budget. And there are some poor casting choices.
Some of the dialogue is just off plot and character. At one point it descends into totally incongruous family argument.
The whole plot is very convoluted, confused and unclear. You could be half way through the movie before you understand who everyone is and what's going on. And even 2/3rds of the way through, it's still confusing.
Of course, being a time travel movie, there are the inevitable anomalies. Unfortunately, there are a few glaring ones. It's not a suspension of disbelief thing, but the way time and time travel is supposed to work in the movie - it varies to support the plot.
There is a sort of twist or two but by this time you're probably not bothered and the attempt at the twisty reveal thing at the end was so predictable.
And the music jars terribly. Some of it's just really annoying but most of the time it's waaaaaay over the top. Oh, writer/director and composer have the same surname. Nepotism, perhaps?
The result is a bitty, scrappy, movie that does no favours for anyone, especially time travel fans. The subject matter alone gives it a second star but time travel fans will miss nothing (but a poor movie) by giving this a miss.
A very small budget Science fiction movie, possibly made for TV that kept me entertained throughout. I am a sucker for time travel, but it had some original ideas that impressed me. The effects are really not that important, use your imagination, the plot kept me interested and the acting was reasonable. Special note for the character called Brego, a person from the distant future with a wonderfully camp South West English accent, put a smile on my face every time he opened his mouth. Anyone who is a lover of Sci-fi should give this movie a try, far better than some of the Hollywood rubbish.
Did you know
- GoofsThroughout the film The Captain has a '95' shield badge on his chest. However, when he actually goes back to meet Sally it changes to become '95ers', then back to '95' moments later.
- SoundtracksProfundis
Written by Paul O'Connor
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- 95ers: Echoes
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $750,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 36m(96 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1 / (high definition)
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content