[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

Time after Time

  • TV Movie
  • 2011
  • PG
  • 1h 29m
IMDb RATING
6.1/10
476
YOUR RATING
Time after Time (2011)
DramaFantasyRomance

After returning to Long Island to confront his past, a journalist comes face to face with his future.After returning to Long Island to confront his past, a journalist comes face to face with his future.After returning to Long Island to confront his past, a journalist comes face to face with his future.

  • Director
    • Gary Harvey
  • Writer
    • George Beckerman
  • Stars
    • Richard Thomas
    • Kaj-Erik Eriksen
    • Christine Chatelain
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    6.1/10
    476
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Gary Harvey
    • Writer
      • George Beckerman
    • Stars
      • Richard Thomas
      • Kaj-Erik Eriksen
      • Christine Chatelain
    • 12User reviews
    • 2Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Photos33

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 27
    View Poster

    Top cast22

    Edit
    Richard Thomas
    Richard Thomas
    • Dick Woodstein
    Kaj-Erik Eriksen
    Kaj-Erik Eriksen
    • Richard Kerm
    Christine Chatelain
    Christine Chatelain
    • Jackie Bell
    Chris Cochrane
    Chris Cochrane
    • Moose
    Adrian Hough
    Adrian Hough
    • Burt Delfino
    Stephen Huszar
    Stephen Huszar
    • Dr. Jeff Farley
    Richard Harmon
    Richard Harmon
    • Ricky Warren
    Michael Roberds
    Michael Roberds
    • Will Howard
    Carmen Moore
    Carmen Moore
    • Officer Rita
    Stacy Grant
    Stacy Grant
    • Anna Palindrome
    Alvin Sanders
    Alvin Sanders
    • Chuck
    Juan Riedinger
    Juan Riedinger
    • Tug
    Aubrey Arnason
    Aubrey Arnason
    • Cathy
    Daniel Bacon
    Daniel Bacon
    • Tulsa News Reporter
    Peter Hanlon
    Peter Hanlon
    • Carl
    Zachary Throne
    Zachary Throne
    • Older Ricky Warren
    P. Lynn Johnson
    • Doctor
    Chancz Perry
    • Orderly
    • Director
      • Gary Harvey
    • Writer
      • George Beckerman
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews12

    6.1476
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    7A_Different_Drummer

    another "bumblebee" movie

    In my IMDb persona, I most enjoy finding "bumblebee" movies that is, movies which on paper should have been a dud yet somehow surpassed their own limitations.

    On the negative side, this is yet another creation of the Canuck movie machine, from the country that via clever tax planning and a chronically weak currency turned B-movies into a cash cow. The locations are Canadian as are most of the players, except the leads of course.

    It is the plus side the ledger that is interesting. First, the movies starts and ends with a quote from Kierkegaard -- you don't see that everyday.

    Second when it comes to delving into the paradoxes of time travel - something even the Star Trek franchise agonized over -- these guys had no fear. Maybe it is because they are fearless. Maybe (as with most Canuck films) they were into profit the moment shooting wrapped, so they did not care whether anyone saw ever this or not.

    To say the basis for the time juxtaposition here is weak is like saying that President Obama sometimes overlooked the democratic process. There are tropes, edits, cuts, even entire scenes that make little sense.

    But through it all, the cast delivers solid performances and, at the end of the day, you know this is just a very brave love story. So if you watch it with your heart and not your brain, it will engage.

    In spite of itself.
    6Jackbv123

    Not your typical Hallmark love story

    Unlike most Hallmark love stories, this one is less about the process of the lovers falling in love and more about using time travel to change what is from the story's viewpoint is the future.

    We very quickly learn that Dick is really a future version of Richard who has returned to get Richard to correct his mistake of giving up yet again on his true love, Jackie. This isn't going to be easy because Jackie has a boyfriend.

    In the usual Romance movie, much of the plot centers around how the potential lovers fall in love with each other. In this movie, the plot centers more around first convincing Richard and then having Richard do what needs to be done to change the future which has more to do with being a journalist than being romantic.

    I really dislike time travel movies that are based on changing history as opposed to restoring it. Since the perspective is not so much changing the past as it is changing the future (its all in the viewpoint), that makes this one a little easier to live with. Dick's attempts to convince Richard are intended to be funny, but I found them to be more clumsy writing and acting than funny.

    And there was at least at little time spent trying to bring the lovers together again after an 11 year separation. There are a couple of funny moments as Jackie appears more intent on crippling Richard than loving him, but they are really more accidents than intention. There are some warm moments as well.

    Unlike most sci-fi, there is very little techno-babble, so both the sci-fi fan, and non-fan, may enjoy this different take on Hallmark romance.
    4juneebuggy

    Sweet, sorta mysterious, unspectacular

    This was a sweet, bit of nothing movie that won't leave any lasting marks about a journalist who quits his job after publishing an unconfirmed article about political corruption that causes the politician in question to commit suicide. "Richard" has a penchant for running away from his problems and this latest turn sees him returning to his hometown after an 11 year absence.

    He is immediately hired back at his old job at the local paper where he meets a creepy, stalker dude who turns out to be his future self. Future Richard (AKA Dick) is played by Richard Thomas and the two actors couldn't look more different, but whatever, its a Lifetime movie. Anyways before long Richard also runs into his high school sweetheart and realizes the spark is still there despite her beaning him in the head with a frozen chicken and being engaged to the town Doctor (yawn).

    There are some fun twists and turns as future "Dick" remains mysterious and tries to get Richard to turn his life around, stop running away and get the girl because, well, he's been there and knows how it will turn out if he doesn't. There's also a weak sub story regarding preserving the small town image and not allowing big business "Sir Save-A-Lot" in.

    A couple things: Richard wears the same leather jacket/clothes for the entire movie, as do most of the cast. His wife also doesn't age in the 20 year gap we are shown. Duncan B.C plays small-town "Glenville" USA. 12/15/14
    7calgarywino

    A film for that warm fuzzy feeling

    I thought that this was a decent film; it was gentle, moved at a comfortable pace and gave me a warm feeling. The setting was beautiful, as you would expect of Duncan B.C. and the background score was not intrusive but assisted the atmosphere rather than distracting from it.

    The actors were all good and likable characters, even the town doctor who strayed (the unethical behaviour which another reviewer mentioned) with someone who was likely a patient. Richard Thomas has always been that actor who is like the home town boy of the Waltons who we all like. He gives just enough of that boy with the angst of the man who left things undone but finally finds a way to make his biggest mistake right.

    Though there are not many surprises there are a few little twists that make the plot work but basically it's a feel good film to give you the warm fuzzies on a cool day under your blankie.
    5dblackman70

    Won't win any awards, but, it was sweet

    I love Hallmark movies I'm afraid to admit. Most of them wouldn't win any awards, but, are sweet lovely films that do what movies are supposed to do - leaves you entertained and smiling at the end. Most of them you won't remember in a day or two, but, at least they don't leave you numb with shock at the violence, sex or language like big movies do now. So I was looking forward to Time After Time and it didn't disappoint me. It was lovely and gentle and left me smiling. Richard Thomas was marvellous and the ending was rather wonderful. I may not watch this over and over, but, it kept me smiling. Also, the ending of who she went with couldn't have been more obvious as well as what the Doctor did and why the supermarket was no good.

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Dick chose the surname Woodstein as his assumed name, it a combination of the surnames of his idols Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of Washington Post/Watergate fame.
    • Goofs
      When Richard goes to start his vehicle, the engine does not turn over. Dick comes out and says he pulled the coil wire. This would not prevent the starter from spinning the engine, but it would prevent the engine from running.
    • Crazy credits
      Epilogue:  "Life can only be understood backwards. Unfortunately, it must be lived forward."  --  Kierkegaard
    • Connections
      References La quatrième dimension (1959)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • March 19, 2011 (United States)
    • Countries of origin
      • United States
      • Canada
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
    • Filming locations
      • Duncan, British Columbia, Canada
    • Production company
      • Front Street Pictures
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 29m(89 min)
    • Color
      • Color

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.