Charlie's Angels
- TV Series
- 2011
- Tous publics
- 1h
IMDb RATING
4.4/10
4.5K
YOUR RATING
A cat burglar, a car thief, and a dirty cop get a chance to turn their lives around; fighting crime and working for the mysterious Charlie Townsend.A cat burglar, a car thief, and a dirty cop get a chance to turn their lives around; fighting crime and working for the mysterious Charlie Townsend.A cat burglar, a car thief, and a dirty cop get a chance to turn their lives around; fighting crime and working for the mysterious Charlie Townsend.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Can't think of how a network could let this go to air. Corny writing bad acting terrible set design. Better money spent on reality non scripted stuff than this. Hope they don't commit to more than the min episodes Fake tears bad effects. Bad acting again and again doesn't get better just worse the longer you watch it. Maybe Tom Arnold isn't busy and can do a cameo spot or carrot top. don't see how it could get such a high score unless all cast and crew voted. And may be all their families and so on and so on..... Will give it one more hour that I will never get back and see if it improves. I can only write so much about this waste of air time to fill 10 lines. But maybe this is just what the USA needs to keep them distracted from the real world...
I was not expecting much to begin with but the show was kinda lame.
There was nothing exciting about the action and the story and the acting was not believable. The show felt much longer than 1hr and that is never good. This is another bad remake . It reminded me of "knight rider" a couple of years ago :(
Rachel Taylor was much better in Grey's Anatomy. They're gonna need to make so mayor changes to keep this show alive. The girls seem kinda weak and storyline was not interesting enough.
I don't believe this girls can catch any criminals at all. I can believe they made me long for Drew, Cameron and Lucy. At least these 3 were kinda funny.
There was nothing exciting about the action and the story and the acting was not believable. The show felt much longer than 1hr and that is never good. This is another bad remake . It reminded me of "knight rider" a couple of years ago :(
Rachel Taylor was much better in Grey's Anatomy. They're gonna need to make so mayor changes to keep this show alive. The girls seem kinda weak and storyline was not interesting enough.
I don't believe this girls can catch any criminals at all. I can believe they made me long for Drew, Cameron and Lucy. At least these 3 were kinda funny.
Well It might be unfair to review this show since it only has aired one episode, but i got to say that after watching the first episode I highly doubt that i will continue watching it. Well the Plot is same as the Charlie's angels movies, where three girls with bad pasts get together to fight crime tagged alone with a guy and their secret handler Charlie. First of all there isn't any mystery drama of any sort in this. There will be a problem and they will pretty soon figure out soon without chasing false leads or falling in to danger. The stories reminds me of mutant ninja turtles and knight rider the new series since the girls are always equipped with the best tech stuff all the time. they can access satellite feeds, zoom in to blurred CCTV camera feeds, crack safes in a few seconds which makes it boring and silly to watch. In some instances you would see the girls kicking asses of guys twice or thrice their size which also makes it highly unrealistic. I'm pretty sure they could have done for better may be added a few steamy scenes since that's what female spice or operatives do best. Unless they carry out major changes in the plots I highly doubt this will last much longer.
The lady's look nice, I give em that much, but the rest... seriously?
Lame props, ridiculous screens on the tab, boring fight scenes, a satellite camera that zooms in from the side, and into the hotel room where the hostage lies bound and gagged? Come on!
And by the way: Bosley? Did you put him in so the girlfriends or alleged power-women watching can have something to look at too?
Another sad attempt to make a buck with something that did work very well in the past.
Putting young good-looking girls/boys on the screen might get people to tune in, but after that some substance and quality might be a good idea.
Go get the original, or at least the crappy movies.
Lame props, ridiculous screens on the tab, boring fight scenes, a satellite camera that zooms in from the side, and into the hotel room where the hostage lies bound and gagged? Come on!
And by the way: Bosley? Did you put him in so the girlfriends or alleged power-women watching can have something to look at too?
Another sad attempt to make a buck with something that did work very well in the past.
Putting young good-looking girls/boys on the screen might get people to tune in, but after that some substance and quality might be a good idea.
Go get the original, or at least the crappy movies.
I thought people were exaggerating, but no almost as bad as The New 2 and a Half Twits, pardon me, Men. Has any remake been any good this year?
Only decent thing about the pilot was the soundtrack. Shame on you ABC canceling Ugly Betty and spending loads of money in this piece of garbage.
Anywhoo. How will the actresses get another headline role after this? Who allowed this to go beyond the pilot? Why wasting so much money when the screentests were unpopular?
I feel sorry for the cast because the buzz was tremendous, even if you have no idea who the girls were, in Europe no one knows who the girls are, hence that wasn't part of the attraction, we were expecting not only a good script, but laughs, action the smashing pow that a remake this show deserved.
The first episode was like a female, badly written, acted, directed Austin Powers. No offense meant to Austin Powers.A wast of money and time.
Only decent thing about the pilot was the soundtrack. Shame on you ABC canceling Ugly Betty and spending loads of money in this piece of garbage.
Anywhoo. How will the actresses get another headline role after this? Who allowed this to go beyond the pilot? Why wasting so much money when the screentests were unpopular?
I feel sorry for the cast because the buzz was tremendous, even if you have no idea who the girls were, in Europe no one knows who the girls are, hence that wasn't part of the attraction, we were expecting not only a good script, but laughs, action the smashing pow that a remake this show deserved.
The first episode was like a female, badly written, acted, directed Austin Powers. No offense meant to Austin Powers.A wast of money and time.
Did you know
- TriviaRobert Wagner was originally cast as the voice of Charlie, but was replaced with Victor Garber, who appears uncredited, as John Forsythe did in the original series.
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Wright Stuff: Episode #16.75 (2011)
- How many seasons does Charlie's Angels have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Los Ángeles de Charlie
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h(60 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content