IMDb RATING
4.6/10
1.8K
YOUR RATING
Danny Hill's grandmother just died giving him the opportunity to live in her rent controlled apartment in Manhattan. But as Danny quickly discovers, he may not be the only occupant.Danny Hill's grandmother just died giving him the opportunity to live in her rent controlled apartment in Manhattan. But as Danny quickly discovers, he may not be the only occupant.Danny Hill's grandmother just died giving him the opportunity to live in her rent controlled apartment in Manhattan. But as Danny quickly discovers, he may not be the only occupant.
Photos
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Well, I was really anticipating this film. Van Hanis did a good job but the point is this may be on the line of a Polanski-but it left me not horrified, or feeling the ending was a total twist of the mind. With the exception of a few things such as the building looking like the Dakota-the elevator operator and Van Hansis change in appearance it was a far cry from anything that Polanski ever did. However I did enjoy the Doorman, Joe-two thumbs up Thorsten Kaye-I'm biased.
Will I view it again in the 24 hours that VOD gives you? Maybe so it can grow on me. Maybe not.
This was definitely not what I had myself hyped up for.
Will I view it again in the 24 hours that VOD gives you? Maybe so it can grow on me. Maybe not.
This was definitely not what I had myself hyped up for.
OK, I'm gonna write this short: This movie has some really nice shots, in the beginning it creates an interesting, little weird story, the acting is pretty nice ... BUT there are so many plot holes, so many stuff that happens without any reason, just for the effect and there's no horror at all. This movie is just a concept ... looks like they ran out of money and had to end it somehow. This is sad, because it really had a decent start and could have been a remarkable film. This way there is no comparison to any Polanski movie.
Usually it's nice to watch a movie and in the end be left with a few questions to talk about and to discuss ... but here it's just too much. Why all this?
Usually it's nice to watch a movie and in the end be left with a few questions to talk about and to discuss ... but here it's just too much. Why all this?
This one starts off well, with a young dude moving into his late Gran's sprawling NY apartment, having to stay locked inside and hide from the hungry property moguls for 12 days, after which time his lawyer assures him the apartment will be his outright without further hassle.
That's gotta be one of the longest intro sentences that I've ever written on IMDB, but nonetheless I was intrigued by this weird and whacky premise, as it looked like a chaotically fun story to follow for the dude, who straightaway encounters probs with his unwanted isolation. The apartment 'officer' I guess you'd call him, the very same actor from Bold And The Beautiful who does Ridge, puts forth some mysterious quirk that is humorous. As well, the flingy chick that hooks up with isolated dude is a crackup and should have featured a lot more, but when she just disappears without return the movie slips away badly, even though trapped guy continues his struggles and tries to carry the story forward. A loss of ideas ensues and the movie goes pretty much nowhere and ends with a belly flop from a considerable height. First 40 is good so I enjoyed that section but not the rest after that.
That's gotta be one of the longest intro sentences that I've ever written on IMDB, but nonetheless I was intrigued by this weird and whacky premise, as it looked like a chaotically fun story to follow for the dude, who straightaway encounters probs with his unwanted isolation. The apartment 'officer' I guess you'd call him, the very same actor from Bold And The Beautiful who does Ridge, puts forth some mysterious quirk that is humorous. As well, the flingy chick that hooks up with isolated dude is a crackup and should have featured a lot more, but when she just disappears without return the movie slips away badly, even though trapped guy continues his struggles and tries to carry the story forward. A loss of ideas ensues and the movie goes pretty much nowhere and ends with a belly flop from a considerable height. First 40 is good so I enjoyed that section but not the rest after that.
"Occupant" has one of the nicest, most believable set-ups of any recent urban thriller: Danny (Van Hansis) moves into his granny's (whom he's never met) rent-controlled Manhatten apartment (if you can call a 3500 sq ft space merely that) hoping to continue her $675 a month renting price, with the aide of an overly-friendly/sinister doorman (Thorston Kaye). The only glitch? To secure the place at the low-low figure, he only needs to barricade himself inside the plush joint long enough to lawyer up and win legal custody of the property.
Of course, this isn't as easy as it seems, as a series of eerie coincidences gradually convince Danny that someone's not exactly playing above board in their attempts to foist him out.
Henry Miller's latest film is much glossier than his previous outings, nicely shot, with some inventive camera angles. The story, by writer/producer Johnathan Brett, is engaging, if not rendered a bit campy sometimes with it's use of 250-point Helvetica fonts screaming DAY ONE, DAY TWO, etc.
The real weakness, I think, is the casting of Van Hansis --- a soap opera actor who looks a bit too Abercrombie to be mistaken for the average working-joe-farm-boy-come-to-the-big-city. He's not bad, really, his acting is just very one-note (as with many soap opera alumni, his range is either in the "super sincere" or "utterly hysterical" registers...they're either whispering or shouting).
Unfortunately, he doesn't do well with the latter. It appears Miller found that out, because the film tends to lapse into gimmicks like speed-frame, freeze-frame, and wipes particularly in the final scenes. It takes a lot of gravitas to pull off the kind of gut wrenching panic that's needed here, and Hansis just doesn't have it. This is a shame, because the film, overall, has a lot of unique touches going for it. It just needs an actor with a resume that's longer than his Facebook page to support it.
Of course, this isn't as easy as it seems, as a series of eerie coincidences gradually convince Danny that someone's not exactly playing above board in their attempts to foist him out.
Henry Miller's latest film is much glossier than his previous outings, nicely shot, with some inventive camera angles. The story, by writer/producer Johnathan Brett, is engaging, if not rendered a bit campy sometimes with it's use of 250-point Helvetica fonts screaming DAY ONE, DAY TWO, etc.
The real weakness, I think, is the casting of Van Hansis --- a soap opera actor who looks a bit too Abercrombie to be mistaken for the average working-joe-farm-boy-come-to-the-big-city. He's not bad, really, his acting is just very one-note (as with many soap opera alumni, his range is either in the "super sincere" or "utterly hysterical" registers...they're either whispering or shouting).
Unfortunately, he doesn't do well with the latter. It appears Miller found that out, because the film tends to lapse into gimmicks like speed-frame, freeze-frame, and wipes particularly in the final scenes. It takes a lot of gravitas to pull off the kind of gut wrenching panic that's needed here, and Hansis just doesn't have it. This is a shame, because the film, overall, has a lot of unique touches going for it. It just needs an actor with a resume that's longer than his Facebook page to support it.
At the start of this movie my hopes were high - an original plot with the scope for scary ghosty stuff. Unfortunately, when you're stuck in an apartment which you 'can't' leave it doesn't take long for the boredom to set in. There was an opportunity for chills and thrills but for some reason the execution is dull and listless. For some reason I started getting a hankering for The Shining - the definitive descent into madness. If you watch The Apartment then you'll get similar pangs after about 20 minutes.
If you delve into Korean horror then you can discover interesting themes fully realised and not just imagined by the director.
Nili has put together a classy list - http://www.imdb.com/list/8txFAcBLcUo/
If you delve into Korean horror then you can discover interesting themes fully realised and not just imagined by the director.
Nili has put together a classy list - http://www.imdb.com/list/8txFAcBLcUo/
Did you know
- How long is Occupant?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Оккупант
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 26m(86 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content