In the year 2029 the government knows where you are and what you're doing. To be in love you must escape...In the year 2029 the government knows where you are and what you're doing. To be in love you must escape...In the year 2029 the government knows where you are and what you're doing. To be in love you must escape...
Morris Rocky Rungano
- Broadcaster
- (as Morris P. Rungano)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The entire gay theme detracted from what could have been a good story.
The entire concept of chips in bodies was good and the basic story had potential...but the gay love story just trashed it...well that and the horrible music.
The music and production values were just atrocious and that made the story and film just a hideous piece of cinema to watch.
Add to that a gay love story which didn't quite fit in and some unbelievably horrible dialogue and flat characters and you have this...something which will go nowhere.
Not trashing gay love stories...there are some which I find awesome - even though I am not gay...they are interesting and have character and story. This just kills the entire structure.
Maybe it was to get financing for the movie - to seed money from the gay arts vaults - well that;s OK...but the story was bad and the actors were even worse.
The script was horrible and of course, the music was downright nasty in all respects.
It failed on so many levels with a concept that had plenty of potential - even for a small budget.
The entire concept of chips in bodies was good and the basic story had potential...but the gay love story just trashed it...well that and the horrible music.
The music and production values were just atrocious and that made the story and film just a hideous piece of cinema to watch.
Add to that a gay love story which didn't quite fit in and some unbelievably horrible dialogue and flat characters and you have this...something which will go nowhere.
Not trashing gay love stories...there are some which I find awesome - even though I am not gay...they are interesting and have character and story. This just kills the entire structure.
Maybe it was to get financing for the movie - to seed money from the gay arts vaults - well that;s OK...but the story was bad and the actors were even worse.
The script was horrible and of course, the music was downright nasty in all respects.
It failed on so many levels with a concept that had plenty of potential - even for a small budget.
Had the cast and crew seemed any less sincere in their efforts to make the best flick they could, I would probably tear a film like this to shreds. But more important to me than having the best of acting, props, effect, etc... etc... et... is to come away from the film with the feeling that it wasn't just thrown together and half-heartedly produced. I do think the producer - the kinda' cute older gent playing the lead - likes making these movies partially as an excuse to get to mess with young dudes, and find it amusing how he is utterly unafraid to let it all hang out in his flicks (literally). Even so, I don't get the impression that's the entirety of his motivation - that seems more like just one of the "perks" to him.
That said, if you just want to know the pros and cons, here are my views on the matter:
Pros: - Realistic, believable plot - I have little doubt that sooner or later, humans will be tagged in just such a way, and that sooner or later someone, somewhere is going to take advantage of it for their own tyrannical ambitions; - While all the effects were cheap, they weren't utterly absurd like they tend to be in most films of similar budget. This guy really seems to know how to make the most with practically nothing, and to make it believable. Not that there were a lot of really special effects - the CGI was bare-bones minimal - but the look, feel and functionality of the props (automated voice greetings, videoconferencing, one or two of the implants after they'd been removed & destroyed, etc...) were good; - A message that people really do need to hear, about a topic we're almost certain to face not too far from now; - Paul Bright's exposed booty.
Cons: - Bad acting. Bad, bad, bad. At least for the most part. One or two of them were pretty good most all of the time, but all of them had their moments where they couldn't possibly have been any less believable. You really do have to just overlook it through much of the flick, so if that bothers you then you probably should avoid this one; - Unclear plot details - particularly regarding the man he video'd with and his boss lady. I understood the guy's role in the unseen back-story leading to the movie's current events, but not what he was supposed to be doing in the present and definitely not what role his boss lady was supposed to be playing; - Paul Bright's exposed booty. You're either going to like it or you're not, and after seeing similar in "Angora Ranch", it seems fairly clear he's just being exhibitionistic. I personally don't mind, but a lot of people would and so I figured you might as well hear about it now. It's not real frequent or anything, but for the short time it's there, it's _all_ "there", if you catch my drift.
That said, if you just want to know the pros and cons, here are my views on the matter:
Pros: - Realistic, believable plot - I have little doubt that sooner or later, humans will be tagged in just such a way, and that sooner or later someone, somewhere is going to take advantage of it for their own tyrannical ambitions; - While all the effects were cheap, they weren't utterly absurd like they tend to be in most films of similar budget. This guy really seems to know how to make the most with practically nothing, and to make it believable. Not that there were a lot of really special effects - the CGI was bare-bones minimal - but the look, feel and functionality of the props (automated voice greetings, videoconferencing, one or two of the implants after they'd been removed & destroyed, etc...) were good; - A message that people really do need to hear, about a topic we're almost certain to face not too far from now; - Paul Bright's exposed booty.
Cons: - Bad acting. Bad, bad, bad. At least for the most part. One or two of them were pretty good most all of the time, but all of them had their moments where they couldn't possibly have been any less believable. You really do have to just overlook it through much of the flick, so if that bothers you then you probably should avoid this one; - Unclear plot details - particularly regarding the man he video'd with and his boss lady. I understood the guy's role in the unseen back-story leading to the movie's current events, but not what he was supposed to be doing in the present and definitely not what role his boss lady was supposed to be playing; - Paul Bright's exposed booty. You're either going to like it or you're not, and after seeing similar in "Angora Ranch", it seems fairly clear he's just being exhibitionistic. I personally don't mind, but a lot of people would and so I figured you might as well hear about it now. It's not real frequent or anything, but for the short time it's there, it's _all_ "there", if you catch my drift.
This movie totally creeped me out with bad acting, stupid dialogue and gay kissing between the older man and the 20yo twink that looked like two trouts mouths agape.
There is very little one can say that's good about this film...other than to say "yeah...I guess it's a film?" The acting is laughably bad (they seem to have used any/all characters from John Waters' early works as the standard). The premise is one of a futuristic "big brother" type of doomsday scenario...only the budget is too small for anything other than the occasional CGI effects on monitors to get this point across (wait...that implies there was a point). The man-boy love premise pervasive throughout this film seems more like a NAMBLA recruitment tactic than an actual plot-line. The writer/director/"star" seems to believe anyone cares to see him naked is probably the biggest fantasy in this film. No wait...the second biggest fantasy, since I just read the reviews and there are actually people giving this 10 stars...apparently thinking we don't know they are somehow attached to the film or actors.
In sum, unless you too are a creepy old man who fantasizes about scenarios where it could possibly be acceptable to seduce and sleep with the boy next door...just don't watch this.
In sum, unless you too are a creepy old man who fantasizes about scenarios where it could possibly be acceptable to seduce and sleep with the boy next door...just don't watch this.
Obvious, not a great film. Good intentioned, no doubts , using an idea who seems more than realistic in contemporary context, but , for many reasons, only a nice try, like many independent films and the basic motif remains the awful acting and the not inspired dialogues.
A film like a salad - many ingredients, reasonable taste , a slice of indulgence from viewer, some shirtless scenes and too gay in many scenes, good mix of past facts, idealism and crisis , family , friendship and Sci Fi with flavor of distopia, the elder man and his cat - Edison remains the best actor of film - , a young guy, some thrills .
And, at first sight, just enough.
A film like a salad - many ingredients, reasonable taste , a slice of indulgence from viewer, some shirtless scenes and too gay in many scenes, good mix of past facts, idealism and crisis , family , friendship and Sci Fi with flavor of distopia, the elder man and his cat - Edison remains the best actor of film - , a young guy, some thrills .
And, at first sight, just enough.
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 33m(93 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content