IMDb RATING
5.0/10
844
YOUR RATING
Many people are left dead when a man known only as "The Digger" opens fire in a train station. A hand written letter is the only clue.Many people are left dead when a man known only as "The Digger" opens fire in a train station. A hand written letter is the only clue.Many people are left dead when a man known only as "The Digger" opens fire in a train station. A hand written letter is the only clue.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 5 nominations total
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
This is a decent although unremarkable thriller in which the FBI recruits an ex-agent who is an expert in verifying and examining documents. He has a lot of personal issues including an ex-wife who wants the kids and a son who is still suffering the after-effects of being terrorized by a murderer he had put in prison several years before.
Although director Norma Bailey does a decent job in all departments and the actors handle their roles competently, the movie itself soon falls into fairly predictable patterns and scenes and the potentially interesting idea of showing how the analysis of documents and profiling of killers actually works is reduced to a few gadgets and flashes of insight. Instead we are distracted by family drama.
I cannot tell if the poverty in the script is due to Jeffrey Deaver's novel or to Ron Hutchinson's adaptation. I am not familiar with Mr. Deaver's works and the two other movies I have seen written by Mr. Hutchinson -- who also co-produced this TV-movie -- have not been very interesting, so I suspect it is not Mr. Deaver's responsibility. However, whoever is responsible, unless you are a fan of the genre, you can give this a miss.
Although director Norma Bailey does a decent job in all departments and the actors handle their roles competently, the movie itself soon falls into fairly predictable patterns and scenes and the potentially interesting idea of showing how the analysis of documents and profiling of killers actually works is reduced to a few gadgets and flashes of insight. Instead we are distracted by family drama.
I cannot tell if the poverty in the script is due to Jeffrey Deaver's novel or to Ron Hutchinson's adaptation. I am not familiar with Mr. Deaver's works and the two other movies I have seen written by Mr. Hutchinson -- who also co-produced this TV-movie -- have not been very interesting, so I suspect it is not Mr. Deaver's responsibility. However, whoever is responsible, unless you are a fan of the genre, you can give this a miss.
Well, got to tell you why:
1) Their screenplays always with very bad dialog, making every character's speaking and talking a bit of unreal, like recited from memory, and everybody speaking with pure American English without any accent. Nobody got any background accent like everybody grew up in the same house, same school, same neighborhood, same area, same city and same State.
2) Horrible nonsensical sound track. The background music in every movie alwayssounded like the same. Lot of time the sound track started without anynecessity and stopped abruptly without any reason.
3) The funny thing is every role in the Lifetime movies is just so polite and sounds like well educated.
4) The female characters are always played by pretty women, you just can't find any ugly ones, even the young kids are pretty.
5) Very lame directing.
This movie is no exception. You might get brain tumor if you force yourself to keep watching it, just by listening to the pure American English without any accent by everybody would drive you nuts.
1) Their screenplays always with very bad dialog, making every character's speaking and talking a bit of unreal, like recited from memory, and everybody speaking with pure American English without any accent. Nobody got any background accent like everybody grew up in the same house, same school, same neighborhood, same area, same city and same State.
2) Horrible nonsensical sound track. The background music in every movie alwayssounded like the same. Lot of time the sound track started without anynecessity and stopped abruptly without any reason.
3) The funny thing is every role in the Lifetime movies is just so polite and sounds like well educated.
4) The female characters are always played by pretty women, you just can't find any ugly ones, even the young kids are pretty.
5) Very lame directing.
This movie is no exception. You might get brain tumor if you force yourself to keep watching it, just by listening to the pure American English without any accent by everybody would drive you nuts.
"He will kill again at 12 each day for the next 2 days. I am wanting 20 million in cash." When a man known only as "The Digger" opens fire in a train station many are left dead. The only clue the FBI has is a hand written letter with demands on it. Agent Margurete (Henstridge) needs help analyzing it and the best is retired specialist Kincaid (Scott). I was a little weary of this at the outset. The actors I like, but it is a "Lifetime" movie, and that kinda scared me. After about 10 min I was hooked and was really shocked at how good this movie was. Good acting and good story telling made this one tense all the way through. Not only is it one of the best "Lifetime" movies I have seen, it's also one of the better movies coming out this week. Without trying to give anything away, this is also the first "Lifetime" movie I have seen where the man is portrayed as a good guy. Way to go. The only complaint I had is the ending, but being the type of movie this is it is to be expected. Just a little too anti-climatic for my liking. Other then that I really enjoyed this. Overall, very entertaining and tense, a very good choice. I give it a B+.
Would I watch it again? - I might, to catch clues I may have missed.
*Also try - Lies In Plain Sight & The Zodiac
Would I watch it again? - I might, to catch clues I may have missed.
*Also try - Lies In Plain Sight & The Zodiac
The strange thing is being a bad movie, with awful dialogue, with very predictable twist, it is not easy to admit than it is real bad. In my case, for the simpathy for Tom Everett Scott and for the nice subplot of custody. For fans, I suppose, it can be the perfect film. But, sure, an easy thriller/ policier can be a reasonable definition.
I look forward to Natasha Henstridge in Lifetime or Hallmark movies - she makes it a bit more of an A list cast. She plays an FBI agent investigating a mass shooting who threatens to do it again unless he is paid some ransoms. Strangely they seem to want to negotiate with terrorists. Tom Everett Scott another better than Lifetime actor plays an expert on documents who can help find the criminals but has retired because of some traumatic incident involving his kid.
This is a better than usual Lifetime thriller especially since mass shootings are in the forefront of the news these days. Liked the ending - neat and feel good.
This is a better than usual Lifetime thriller especially since mass shootings are in the forefront of the news these days. Liked the ending - neat and feel good.
Did you know
- Quotes
Parker Kincaid: Anybody who says that they can analyze personality from handwriting alone is lying. It's like reading tarot cards and tea leaves. I mean, it's bogus.
Margaret Lukas: People make a living doing it.
Parker Kincaid: Yeah, people make a living writing horoscopes. It's got just as much to do with reality.
- ConnectionsFeatures Les Pierrafeu (1960)
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- La larme du diable
- Filming locations
- Hamilton, Ontario, Canada(651 Burlington St. E.)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 29m(89 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content