Logorama©

This Oscar nominated short animation is about an American city composed of logos, that gets destroyed in a chaos of man-made and natural disasters.

"Logorama" may be viewed as innovative and entertaining as it incorporates so many brands and logos in the film. it may help to connect with the viewers as people and backgrounds are already familiar. However, I argue that "Logorama" could be a vehicle marketing, serving to advertise hundreds of brands in a space of 16 minutes. Most of the logos are on the screen for no apparent reason, and adds no storyline or depth to the plot. The logos are there just for the sake of being there. The inundation of unsubtle product placement and in your face advertising makes me wonder whether artistic merits are still prevalent in the short. I am hesitant to praise this short in a positive manner.

'Logorama' is an Oscar-winning short comedy that cleverly satirizes extreme corporate-and-consumerism by creating a universe built upon various logos and products and inserting within this universe a largely parodic action-movie-plot. It all leads to disaster and catastrophe and has a largely cynical smile on its lips throughout, sarcastically shoving in the viewer's face dozens upon dozens of consumerist products and logos that are inserted into the film in all sorts of clever little ways. Technically, it isn't perfect (the voice acting is mostly at least okay, but for some reason its recording doesn't exactly always fit the environment of the film, it definitely sounds like it was recorded separately, which a lot of animated films are able to disguise, if any of what I just said makes any sense), but the animation very well fits the story, style, and concept, and the writing is witty and hilarious. It's so entertaining the flaws are almost completely overshadowed and what lies before us is a superb satirical comedy that only runs at around 17 minutes.

In a city made completely of corporate logos and branding, two cops shoot the breeze until they spot a fugitive from justice and give chase leading to a cataclysmic conclusion.

Whether or not it is intended as a commentary on the nature of American "culture" (and I think it is), this is a remarkably well made short film that mixes clever ideas with a real understanding of the genre that they are using as a vehicle to their satire. To deal with the surface first – this film is very clever in the way it utilises brands and logos in every aspect of the world it creates. Not all of them will be recognisable but the design of them will make them unmistakable as brands even if the names escape you. It is startling how many you will recognise and, while some have complained that the film is little more than a game of "spot the brand", I did think that the high hit-rate was perhaps part of the point and it was a point well made.

If the film was only a cleverly use series of logos then perhaps this may have been a valid point, but the short goes onto to spoof American movies and culture by delivering all this in the middle of a high-octane crime thriller where everything goes up to 11 and, if it can be destroyed in glorious Technicolor, then it is. It gets this spot on and shows a real understanding of the genre. OK the Tarantino-esque chat is a little obvious but past this the direction and framing of the shots and "camera" movements could all be taken straight out of many blockbuster action movies – movies perhaps that are accused of product-placement with their cars, watches, drinks etc etc. In this way the film actually engages beyond "spot the logo" and "isn't America morally bankrupt?" because it delivers an exciting action short with plenty of movement and style.

I really was surprised by how enjoyable it was. I would have liked it to have had a bit more teeth in regards the satirical aspect to it but this part still did just about work for me. Beyond it though I can understand why some did see it as all style and logos because the logos are used really well and the style is genre-perfect. A very clever short film that deserves credit for not wallowing in the smartness of its idea or for being snide or acerbic in its commentary.

François Alaux, Hervé de Crécy and Ludovic Houplain apply an extensive use of symbolism in their short film Logorama (2009) to explore the realist idea of mass consumerism in a negative light. The characters, their surroundings, and every last object in the film are all anthropomorphised and become an embodiment of the persistent and unrelenting commercials we see in our everyday life. Far from being simply a chaotic incorporation of advertisements, Logorama is a witty and hyperbolic social commentary on the ubiquity of advertising and its energetic show of entrepreneurial images and metaphors make it a superb work of realism. By launching a barrage of countless brand logos at the viewer, Logorama makes us take notice of our solely consumerist generation. The choice of logos was decided by several different aspects. The heroes of the short, several Bibendi (or the Michelin Men), were chosen because of their perception as tough and being able to withstand hazards, it was also owing to their rotund appearance acting as a caricature of American policemen due to the long held notion of them being overweight. Ronald McDonald was chosen to be the villain because of the perception of clowns being fear-provoking; this is also an instance of major influencing the minor, as the Joker from Batman was part of the inspiration for this choice. One can easily see the contrasting characteristics of each company being incorporated into their characters; the Michelin Men who help with road hazards and ensure you make it on your way are shown in a better light than Ronald McDonald, the mascot for a company whose unhealthy and fatty food cause heart disease. Furthermore, by subverting the usual wholesome image of Ronald McDonald, the creators are emphasising the evils of commercialising and brand overuse. The menacingly ominous appearance of him at the end of the credits, after the viewer has seen him supposedly die, accentuates the idea of no escape from major companies and their icons; the indestructible symbols of the manufacturing supremacy; a very realist idea. Other, more trivial, characters were chosen for their graphic outward appearance such as Julius Pringles, the mascot for the Pringles potato snacks, being all the van drivers in the film as people associate them with moustaches. Mr Clean is portrayed as a flamboyantly camp stereotype, attributable to his appearance; the earring, the tight trousers, the muscular arms shown bulging through his tight white top and his shaved head. Other icons chosen include the Big Boy and Haribo mascots which do not fit the identity that their company and the general public have given them and have a completely different nature than the one they are associated with shown through their filthy language and misbehaviour. This is echoed in several of the other icons and works because of the viewers' knowledge of the companies they are known for, for instance the Esso girl smoking. By pitting corporations against one another, Logorama demonstrates how they are fighting off the competition; this is shown when Ronald McDonald destroys the Pizza Hut restaurant and when he is shown killing other logos such as Mr. Peanut or the Michelin man in a Maurice Binder barrel homage shot. This symbolism portrays a very real situation; this depiction of what these companies iconic logos will do to survive shows the desperate or harsh lengths the companies will go to in order to stay on top and bankrupt one another. By bouncing the companies off each other Logorama also shows the predicament of the onslaught of consumer culture feeding off one another and itself; an instance being when Ronald McDonald is flung from his Grease 2 bicycle when driving into a Weightwatchers sign. A company like Weightwatchers would have less demand without fast food restaurants like the one Ronald stands for. Next, the pace of the film is very rushed, with each key event taking seconds to happen, this can be seen to symbolise the speed of our everyday lives, the speed of commercial breaks on television, and the speed with which companies bring out new products and advertisements.

LOGORAMA brings to life a world built out of familiar logos. Hundreds of logos and mascots are used, and they include examples from software companies, shopping centers, restaurants, sports teams, movies, and any number of other products, agencies, and corporations. It's a lot of fun watching all of these familiar logos used so creatively. They fill the screen and zip by without calling attention to themselves. Watching LOGORAMA is like a game of "How Many Logos Can You Name?" To fully appreciate this animated short, one needs to freeze-frame each part and check out all the details.

I cannot imagine how much work it must have been filling this virtual city with all of those brands. Each logo fits in in some logical way. Boxy logos, for example, are often used as buildings, while pedestrians are made from the yellow AOL Instant Messenger guy or the Bic pen guy. Cops are Michelin men. The zoo includes the MGM lion and the Linux penguin. Hundreds and hundreds of everyday logos are used and they are used so cleverly that it nearly boggles the mind. As new logos reveal themselves, the viewer is awestruck. "Aw, man! No way!"

It's that cool.

The plot is secondary, but includes chase scenes, gunfire, and natural disasters. It's action-packed. The dialogue is laced with profanity and the cartoon has a mature (PG-13?) edge.

LOGORAMA doesn't seem to have any deep symbolic meaning. It's just a fun way to kind of comment on how many different corporate logos people are familiar with nowadays. Our everyday lives are flooded with these images on TV, in newspaper ads, on the street, etc. This film takes these well-known images and has fun with them.

I think it's great fun to see all of the familiar logos and images, but the profanity seems a little unnecessary and off-putting and the low-budget voice cast could be better. (Just my opinion.) Still the visual experience is well worth it and the details in this short warrant repeat viewings and freeze-frame inspection.

How many logos can YOU name?