IMDb RATING
5.7/10
1.5K
YOUR RATING
A research submarine beneath the Arctic stumbles upon a terrifying secret with earth-shattering consequences.A research submarine beneath the Arctic stumbles upon a terrifying secret with earth-shattering consequences.A research submarine beneath the Arctic stumbles upon a terrifying secret with earth-shattering consequences.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Mediocre - average: lacking exceptional quality.
The once great BBC has fallen foul yet again to that great modern British attribute; mediocrity. While usually I would applaud the BBC for it's policy on social cohesion the actors inclusion is just well......formulaic. The way in which the BBC put together this drama is almost as though it was drama-by-numbers.
All the building blocks are there:
Ethnic minorities represented (including the new kid on the British block the eastern European) check.
Evil state puppet to attract liberals: check
SF concept to attract males under 45: check
Unnecessary romance to draw in female viewers: check.
Complicated yet vague plot: check.
Sum of all it's parts....FAIL.
The dialogue was ABYSS-mal, the characters seemed to ALIENate the audience rather than draw them and I do understand why viewers might seem DEEPly LOSTed when watching it.
The once great BBC has fallen foul yet again to that great modern British attribute; mediocrity. While usually I would applaud the BBC for it's policy on social cohesion the actors inclusion is just well......formulaic. The way in which the BBC put together this drama is almost as though it was drama-by-numbers.
All the building blocks are there:
Ethnic minorities represented (including the new kid on the British block the eastern European) check.
Evil state puppet to attract liberals: check
SF concept to attract males under 45: check
Unnecessary romance to draw in female viewers: check.
Complicated yet vague plot: check.
Sum of all it's parts....FAIL.
The dialogue was ABYSS-mal, the characters seemed to ALIENate the audience rather than draw them and I do understand why viewers might seem DEEPly LOSTed when watching it.
I liked the premise, unknown danger, underwater thus claustrophobic thus small cast (including Minnie Driver who I've always liked). I still think the idea could have worked. However what we got was an absolute disaster. It failed on every level I can think of. There were so many holes in the plot you would be hard pressed to find enough large underwater vessels to drive through them all. The personal relationships between the characters was shallow and unbelievable, and their responses to events totally absurd. It may have been slightly helped by reducing the run time from 5 hours to 90 minutes.
Where are the new BBC programmes to rival Doomwatch and Out of the Unknown, or the fantastic Edge of Darkness. Maybe I'm just getting rather old.
How many BBC executives are going to get a bonus for this one I wonder?
And as for one reviewer using this production to compare the BBC with HBO I just despair.
Where are the new BBC programmes to rival Doomwatch and Out of the Unknown, or the fantastic Edge of Darkness. Maybe I'm just getting rather old.
How many BBC executives are going to get a bonus for this one I wonder?
And as for one reviewer using this production to compare the BBC with HBO I just despair.
I saw this being advertised on the BBC and it looked quite interesting so I watched the first part. And I was hooked! OK the bad acting was a little off putting, but the show had created a mystery about a Submarine that goes missing in the Arctic ocean and something gigantic had caused it's disappearance.
I told all my friends about it, and said to catch the repeat in the week and I got on-board a few people that was hooked to.
And then part two happened! The mystery has been solved you learn about the something gigantic and the bad acting is still there and this is only part 2 out of 5.
By the end of part 3 you are now bored and know how the story is going to pan out.
You find yourself uninterested and really don't care what happens to anyone, and actually hope that they all somehow meet a horrible icy death by the end of part 5.
I really wish I had not invested 5 hours of my life in this predictable, badly written, poorly acted rubbish.
And I have to say a big SORRY to my friends that I dragged into this boring show. Can you forgive me?
I told all my friends about it, and said to catch the repeat in the week and I got on-board a few people that was hooked to.
And then part two happened! The mystery has been solved you learn about the something gigantic and the bad acting is still there and this is only part 2 out of 5.
By the end of part 3 you are now bored and know how the story is going to pan out.
You find yourself uninterested and really don't care what happens to anyone, and actually hope that they all somehow meet a horrible icy death by the end of part 5.
I really wish I had not invested 5 hours of my life in this predictable, badly written, poorly acted rubbish.
And I have to say a big SORRY to my friends that I dragged into this boring show. Can you forgive me?
Having read some of the critics reviews, most of which were not very complementary, I decided to give this miniseries a go considering I like most of the cast. Minnie Driver, Goran Visnjic. Sacha Dhawan (who played a delightfully evil Master in the most recent Dr Who series) and Antonia Thomas (from the Good Doctor) as talented people I have appreciated for some time, so I gave this a go. And I was pleasantly surprised.
While I did pick up on some issues with scientific inaccuracies (show me a sci-fi show that doesn't for the sake of speeding the narrative up) I did find the story and intrigue compelling. The characters weren't one-dimensional, they (mostly) had depth (pun intended) and the themes of international politics interfering with scientific endeavour were quite accurate. While politicians mouth "save the world", they are often in the pocket of corporations, so the notion that they are motivated by a desire for world peace and lowering our dependence on fossil fuels is naive when you consider how much money is involved. If a natural biofuel was discovered that replaced oil it would be fought, pure and simple.
That theme was explored here in depth in imaginative ways.
There are high prices that are paid along the way, friendships are made and lost.
The CG isn't perfect, but even on my 4K TV it still looked good today.
So, don't let the nay-sayers turn you off. Give The Deep a go. It's value Sci-Fi with a modern tale to tell.
While I did pick up on some issues with scientific inaccuracies (show me a sci-fi show that doesn't for the sake of speeding the narrative up) I did find the story and intrigue compelling. The characters weren't one-dimensional, they (mostly) had depth (pun intended) and the themes of international politics interfering with scientific endeavour were quite accurate. While politicians mouth "save the world", they are often in the pocket of corporations, so the notion that they are motivated by a desire for world peace and lowering our dependence on fossil fuels is naive when you consider how much money is involved. If a natural biofuel was discovered that replaced oil it would be fought, pure and simple.
That theme was explored here in depth in imaginative ways.
There are high prices that are paid along the way, friendships are made and lost.
The CG isn't perfect, but even on my 4K TV it still looked good today.
So, don't let the nay-sayers turn you off. Give The Deep a go. It's value Sci-Fi with a modern tale to tell.
this series is inspired by the film of the same title, but starts out as flawed as the original film ends.
what else can i say. this series uses poor c.g. to amuse a somatose audience, and uses filler dialog in the same way.
whoever put this series together deserves a good old fashioned trip to the wood shed.
it has few plot points, obviously filled between with incongruous character reactions and stupid dialog which prompt time-filling conflicts, which stretches this tripe from a ninety minute show, into a British series length.
i was insulted by the watching, but unfortunately i kept viewing to see if it would get better or worse. the good news is it didn't get any worse. it played mediocre all the way through.
what else can i say. this series uses poor c.g. to amuse a somatose audience, and uses filler dialog in the same way.
whoever put this series together deserves a good old fashioned trip to the wood shed.
it has few plot points, obviously filled between with incongruous character reactions and stupid dialog which prompt time-filling conflicts, which stretches this tripe from a ninety minute show, into a British series length.
i was insulted by the watching, but unfortunately i kept viewing to see if it would get better or worse. the good news is it didn't get any worse. it played mediocre all the way through.
Did you know
- TriviaIn real life, Ron Donachie, who plays Sturridge, is the brother-in-law of series costume designer, 'Trish Biggar'.
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Wright Stuff: Episode #14.5 (2010)
- How many seasons does The Deep have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- The Deep: voyage au fond des mers
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was The Deep: aux frontières des abysses (2010) officially released in India in English?
Answer