41 ans, toujours puceau

It takes a lot for me to turn off a movie that I paid to rent. The 4 movies that were meshed together are all great comedies, unfortunately this parody was unable to impress me at all. I guess if you are 12 years old, and hearing the F-Bomb being dropped makes you laugh, then you'll love this movie because the script is so poorly written its pathetic. I wasted my dollar at Redbox on this movie, save yours! The actors that are picked to play in this movie do also do a terrible job at impersonating there much higher skilled famous actors. The man who plays Seth Rogan does an OK job, but away from that there is not much else to say.

A couple of my friends rented this on the off chance that it might be good. I looked at the title and figured it probably wouldn't be good, but I went through with watching it, hoping maybe it would be so bad that it actually became good.

It proved to be neither.

For about the first 10 minutes, The 41-Year-Old Virgin Who Knocked Up Sarah Marshall and Felt Superbad About It actually provides a few good laughs. Stephen Kramer Glickman does a good job making fun of Seth Rogen's characters, and the humor, though somewhat juvenile, is still genuinely funny.

After this, however, the movie descends rapidly into an incoherent mishmash of movie and pop culture parodies drowned in excessive amounts of gross-out humor, leading the viewer to believe it was written by a 14-year-old virgin with ADHD.

On a brighter note, Noureen DeWulf is quite beautiful as the female lead character, Kim.

Overall, this movie does offer a few cheap laughs here and there. In fact, if you like shock films with gratuitous amounts of toilet humor, you may actually enjoy this film. Also, if you are an aspiring filmmaker or screenwriter who wants to know what absolutely not to do when writing or producing, I would consider this a good example to watch. For the rest of us, though, the funny moments of this movie are piled beneath such large amounts of garbage that they are simply not worth looking for.

I thought the movie was just absolutely horrible, with bad jokes that were often being overextended to the point where you think to yourself "I wish this joke would end NOW!". There was one scene which got a laugh out of me and that was when they mocked Twilight (the first time, the 2nd time once again wasn't very funny).

Aside from most of the main characters actors looking pretty close to the original ones this movie had not much to offer, I sit through it but I expected way more than that. I think it had a lot of potential which could've been filled if the movie was written by somebody else than "One Black Guy and One White Guy" as stated in the opening sequence.

This movie was absolutely terrible. For starters who spoofs a comedy?

Spoof movies generally make fun of serious movies, generally horrors.

But no they had to spoof a comedy. Superbad is my favorite movie, the fact that these are even slightly related to each other is a huge embarrassment. I haven't seen the others they spoofed but I guarantee they are one hundred times better than this piece of trash. All it is, is crude, ridiculous and unintelligent jokes.

Trying to make fun of a great comedy and ending up with the worst movie ever made is pretty embarrassing. Not much else to say except. Don't watch it!

Oh my. What a terrible movie. The word "bad" doesn't sum it up. "Awful" doesn't do it justice. "Horrible" would be far too generous. It's honestly beyond any of those words. It's crude, it's distasteful and on many occasions it's even disgusting. There's no story to it. It's an incoherent mess that makes no sense at all. There may be a possibility that this is one of those things that could drive you insane if you try to think too hard about it and make some sort of sense of it. You know the sorts of things I mean: "How big is the universe?" "How did time actually start?" And now - "What in the world is 'The 41-year-old Virgin Who Knocked Up Sarah Marshall And Felt Super Bad About It' actually about?" Really - it's about nothing. And I don't mean that in a Seinfeld "isn't that a clever show?" way, but in a "this is lame-brained and totally meaningless" kind of way. Truly - there's more logic to most "Three Stooges" stuff than there is to this! Is it just a bad spoof? And if it is - what's it a bad spoof of? I really can't figure out what's being badly spoofed. This is the sort of movie you'd be embarrassed about if too many people found out you had watched it. I mean the humour is - well - it's juvenile toilet humour at best. People vomit and fart and defecate and have orgasms. Oh my.

And then - as absolutely meaningless and worthless and ludicrous as it is - it made me laugh on a few occasions. Oh it's lame - but some of it is actually funny, and - humiliated though I may be about it - I had no trouble watching it for its entire 1:22 run time. It even includes some spoofs of folks like the Verizon ("Can you hear me now?") guy, Dr. Phil and North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Il. I mean, you have to give credit to anyone who can throw parodies of all three into the same truly bad movie.

I'm kind of embarrassed to say this, but - 4/10.