Kun maupay man it panahon

This film is uncolored, untethered to any intention of romanticization. It effectively taps into the fear of the unknown which catalyzes the actions of the Filipino people that the film aims to represent - to steal, to cut corners, to burst out into anger, but to also show empathy, dedication to family, and resilience. However, the Filipino concept of "resiliency" is not exploited nor misrepresented, and even provides commentary on films that do tackle that route by presenting restraint (through writing and direction) and then and only then when the context of the entire story has been laid out will it allow complete surrender to the situation. In all of this, the film is still capable of injecting surreal imagery within its hard truths. It expounds to a depth that touches on the nuances of seeking sanity inside and outside an eye of a storm. It is never the fault of those in peril to grasp for every ounce of stillness - stability, security; whether it may be a false sense of the matter or wishful thinking, whether the weather is fine.

The film dwells on the story of how Filipinos from a rural place struggles to survive before and after a typhoon. This may seem like it focuses more on the experiences with typhoon Yolanda back in 2013, but this could also happen in every typhoon that has passed in the Philippines especially as a 3rd world country. Not only did they tackle typhoon problems, but also personal problems as well which makes it a bit more realistic and painful.

I like how the film included traits that Filipinos would do when a typhoon hits the country. An example would be in regards with our faith or how Filipinos would manage to smile especially with the media's presence. In terms of visuals, the film seems to make poverty an aesthetic which would be fine as a film since it could capture the audience's attention and make them feel like they are part of the story. Although in reality, it should not be much glorified for the media and people must actually help these survivors instead. I was kind of sceptical with Daniel Padilla's role in the film at first since it is mostly based on real life situations and it is a heavy topic to ponder upon. His instead has this mainstream image where we only see him as an actor specifically for romantic films. However, he sort of nailed this one along with his Waray language since he did play his part as an actor of his character too.

Overall, it is a great film. This deserves more recognition especially as we live in a country filled with islands which could be greatly affected by typhoons. We must support our own country's films, even if the language being used is not our main language. Imagine it with the same situation as watching Korean series or films without truly understanding the language, but still show our support thanks to subtitles.

This has got to be the most confusing, disrespectful, and cash grab movie I've seen in a while.

I'm a survivor and was happy to know when they announced that a movie was going to be made set in the aftermath of Haiyan and was going to be spoken in our dialect. But all that crumbled when I saw the movie. The movie felt like a cash grab and taking advantage of the Haiyan story.

The camera work and the sets were very good.

The dialogue was clunky. They speak unnaturally. Norma's accent is not something people from the city has. The pacing was slow. The plot line was confusing.

The subtitles did not match what the characters were saying. I wasn't reading the sub titles that much because what they were saying was different so it just confused me. So I'm not sure what the non-Waray speakers got but I got a lot of cringe dialogue. The movie was filled with try hard comic relief including their choice in songs.

I understood the absurdity and surrealism but it was too much for my taste.

I found how they portrayed the locals was disrespectful.

Norma felt pretentious. Civilians in the movie were mean and some acted savagely. We weren't like that. We were in a bad situation, but we were civilized. We greeted people with smiles and happiness. We didn't snatch people's relief bags from them. We looted shops mostly out of necessity. We shared what we looted with our neighbors and at night had our own patrol to make sure bad people don't take advantage of the dark or the fact that our police force was still out of commission.

The reason why I felt they took advantage of the Haiyan story was because the premise of the movie could have been done in any disaster scenario, even just a fake one. But they had to choose Haiyan because making a movie around a storm that left almost 10,000 dead and missing would have been a big hit and bring them big bucks and international recognition. It worked though.

The movie being set in post-Haiyan time was one of the biggest reason why it got the attention it did. If you changed Haiyan with some random/made up storm, it would not have gotten the attention it did. Again, taking advantage.

What further ticked me off was when director Carlo Manatad said in an interview with CNN Philippines that they already had a completed screen play for the movie, but only added the Haiyan element when Haiyan happened. Which further led me to believe that adding the Haiyan element was just a cash grab attempt considering it was an after thought.

When the movie came out in Tacloban, a lot of people that saw the movie said "you're better off watching Exorsis, at least that one was funny".

At the end, my mother stood on the cliff and fireworks bloomed behind, contributing a very beautiful and unforgettable scene.

From a survivor's point of view, the movie brings back so many memories of that unfaithful day. The struggles were very much reminiscent of how we Taclobanons behaved days after Super Typhoon Haiyan ravaged the city. Above all, I'm just impressed as to how they genuinely sounded like native Waray people. It amazes me to see a representation of us Warays in the big screen.