After a drug deal gone wrong, a bruised detective must fight his way through the criminal underworld to rescue a politician's estranged son, unraveling a deep web of corruption and conspirac... Read allAfter a drug deal gone wrong, a bruised detective must fight his way through the criminal underworld to rescue a politician's estranged son, unraveling a deep web of corruption and conspiracy that ensnares his entire city.After a drug deal gone wrong, a bruised detective must fight his way through the criminal underworld to rescue a politician's estranged son, unraveling a deep web of corruption and conspiracy that ensnares his entire city.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The cinematography was a complete disaster. Who at Netflix actually approved this? The camera work was all over the place, and that weird Sin City knockoff CGI style made it even worse. It was distracting, not stylish.
At times, it almost gave me Die Hard vibes - just a little. But without the sharp wit or the comedic relief that made Die Hard a classic, it ended up feeling hollow.
Seriously, with this kind of budget and cast, they had all the ingredients for something great. Instead, they threw it away on cheap visual gimmicks and chaotic direction.
What a waste of production. They really need to stop burning money and start making films that actually make people go, "Wahhh!" - not "What the hell was that?"
Clearly something must have happened to the original execution of this movie. It was quietly delayed for years and was released on streaming just as quietly. It's certainly no "Raid", it's more like a tired Jason Statham type movie. Some of the things in it are plain bizzare, such as the setting. This feels like Gotham or some alternative version of RoboCop's Detroit. The CGI is awful, it's so weird it us even present here in such copious amounts considering what the director is known for. The story is simple, yet indescribably odd. The lighting is also a weak point of this movie. The casting is superb and some of the fights are fine, but again, coming from Gareth Evans it's a bare minimum of what you'd expect. This isn't a terrible movie by any stretch and you can enjoy it for what it turned out to be, but you have to keep your expectations surprisingly low.
The highlight of the movie is probably the club fight with Gesaffelstein blasting, but that's as good as it gets. Overall, pretty passable.
The lighting was awful too, CGI was shockingly bad. Most of the city night sequences looked like cheap video game cutscenes rather than a real movie. At times I honestly forgot I was watching a film and not some low budget game from a decade ago.
After the opening chase, I seriously considered turning it off. It felt like a bad video game come to life - unpolished, incoherent, and completely lacking any real atmosphere or tension even the car physics looked so bad and video game likish
Disappointing is an understatement.
Tom Hardy Through the Years
Tom Hardy Through the Years
Did you know
- TriviaCardiff Bay streets were transformed to resemble snowy American cityscapes for the production.
- GoofsThe characters use firearms that seemingly have unlimited ammunition, firing hundreds of rounds, even from handguns, without ever reloading.
- Quotes
Lawrence Beaumont: Get him back.
Walker: And I never see your fuckin' face again?
Lawrence Beaumont: You heard me.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 990: Sinners (2025)
- SoundtracksThe Mysterious Hiace
Written by The Low Mays & Bakerie
Performed by The Low Mays & Bakerie
Courtesy of CWA Records Limited
- How long is Havoc?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 47m(107 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1