Hunting Atlantis

Disgraceful, even for a medium college-level pupil...these guys are hilarious...they're grasping on half-learned by-the-ear theories, and then struggle, in an imbecile manner, to search proves for their illiterate ineptitude. God forsake, that's no wonder our species is doomed !

Quite interesting, but dialogue is added later and sounds incredibly fake and ruins the show for me. It's like they made this show without any experience or plans, and added dialogue later in a studio. Even the diving sessions has added dialogue. Why couldn't they use a narrator voice instead?

Sensationalistic commentary added after the fact, grasping at straws no real true science. When the hosts talk to actual scientists, you can tell that they are pushing, and the actual scientists are very uncomfortable. I feel that this show is very pushy and fake. The female host is quite unbearable with her commentary and captain obvious moments. All these new documentaries are filmed the same way with no true science and all sensationalism. The male host is a broken record says the same saying over and over and he sounds like a stoner. This whole series feels fake and forced. You can tell that the actual scientists don't want to work with the hosts and that they are just humoring the show for the money.

I'm pretty skeptical about whether Atlantis even existed and, even if it did, I was really skeptical that it would be found. But the team of Stel and Jess presented an interesting premise and did leave us with a previously unknown discovery. The episodes show us a number of ancient and exotic locations which will stimulate one's desire to travel, if not necessarily engage in archaeological exploration. I'm certainly no scientist, but I can see how a show like this might engage young minds in scientific pursuits and away from their iphones and social media outlets.

Out of the two hosts neither has a personality. They will find something and claim it is so interesting or exciting. Yet the tone in their voice says it is not exciting or interesting but barely worth mentioning. The man who claims to be an expert on Atlantis says Plato describes it as being beyond the pillars of Hercules. The problem there is Hercules is a Roman demigod Plato was Greek, They are two entirely different epochs. The name he is looking for is Heracles, which means something along the lines of in honor of Hera, the irony being he is not Hera's son. How can you claim to be an expert in Atlantis and Plato's account if you are not using the Greek names Plato used. How can you claim to know more about Atlantis than everyone else and yet you use the same incorrect name everyone else does? If you don't have something as simple as a name correct why would you have anything else that is more complicated correct?