When a group of Urban Explorers get the chance of a lifetime to explore one of the world's most haunted asylums, they encounter something truly evil, that will not let them leave and will pu... Read allWhen a group of Urban Explorers get the chance of a lifetime to explore one of the world's most haunted asylums, they encounter something truly evil, that will not let them leave and will push them to the edge of sanity.When a group of Urban Explorers get the chance of a lifetime to explore one of the world's most haunted asylums, they encounter something truly evil, that will not let them leave and will push them to the edge of sanity.
Algina Lipskis
- Emma
- (as Algina Lipskyte)
Ausman Khan
- Tramp #2
- (as M Ausman Khan)
Harrison Whitlock
- Huge Tramp
- (as Harry Whitlock)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Upon reading and considering the review by andrew9180, I must admit I may have been overly critical of this one, so I updated my rating and review accordingly.
The story is desperately unoriginal and tedious, the performances are dreadful, the characters are obnoxious, the dialogue feels unnatural and awkward, and the ending is predictable as hell.
The movie lacks suspense and fails to offer anything new. Overall, with its overused plot, terrible acting, obnoxious characters, lack of suspense, predictable ending, awkward dialogues, and poor directing, This is a prime example of a failed production.
The story is desperately unoriginal and tedious, the performances are dreadful, the characters are obnoxious, the dialogue feels unnatural and awkward, and the ending is predictable as hell.
The movie lacks suspense and fails to offer anything new. Overall, with its overused plot, terrible acting, obnoxious characters, lack of suspense, predictable ending, awkward dialogues, and poor directing, This is a prime example of a failed production.
I was just going leave a rating on this film and not a comment but as there are only three comments on here and the one from Nocturnal Mammal was just downright nasty and must be reviewing the wrong film. I thought "Why not?" This is not a found footage film as is asserted over and over by Nocturnal. It's not the best film I've seen by far but for a low budget effort, it's not bad, so I judge it on that. The cinematography is good overall, the acting is more than passable. The score could have been more coherent, it's not bad but each scene feels like it is scored separately or stock music was used, with no overarching theme (I work in sound mixing). The film starts slow but we are rewarded with a full on blood and guts ending that does not seem to let up. There seems to be practical effects used here and they are pretty good. I work in the industry and know how hard it is to complete a feature film and I think my maternal instincts came out when I read the one-star review and felt sorry for the filmmakers, as this seems to be a small independent movie with not a lot of support. I think we should encourage filmmakers and if you have genuine gripe, give examples of where they went wrong rather than just stating "abysmal acting, unlikable characters" and such. I am sure the filmmakers will appreciate it.
This movie stinks to high heaven. First of all, the acting is non-existent. These so called "actors" are amateurs at best and if they got paid to be in this movie, the producers were nuts.
Very early on some overweight guy in a bad beard tickles a girl in a blue pajama set. She laughs maniacally. Only one problem: he doesnt even touch her!
And that's the kind of movie this is. HORRIBLE.
The story line is absurdly unoriginal. It's been done a million times before and better.
The directing is poor. Clearly the director is yet another amateur with a hand held camera.
Frankly I was bored out of my mind.
Very early on some overweight guy in a bad beard tickles a girl in a blue pajama set. She laughs maniacally. Only one problem: he doesnt even touch her!
And that's the kind of movie this is. HORRIBLE.
The story line is absurdly unoriginal. It's been done a million times before and better.
The directing is poor. Clearly the director is yet another amateur with a hand held camera.
Frankly I was bored out of my mind.
You know your movie is bad when people root for your entire main cast to die. The movie isn't even bad cause its low budget. It's just BAD. The characters are so bad that its laughable at times. Like everytime someone pounds on a door you're going to ask yourself who taught these people to open doors. The script is ROUGH. Like some of the worst dialog i've heard in a horror movie. There's one character who trips, screams and gets knocked out throughout the movie and you will actively root for them to die. I'm not exaggerating. This character is useless. Some of the most non-sensical decisions I've ever seen made by the entire cast of main characters. By the end of the movie you will actively want each of them to die. Avoid at all cost. Watched for free and still wish I could get a refund for the time wasted.
There was one positive thing about Night Explorers: the location. Shot at Revesby Abbey, it features cool architecture and creepy corridors.
The story, the acting were all horrible: no believable characters, no believable choices. I spent a lot of time saying, Come on.
For example, the Ghost Hunter-types are actually receiving messages from their Spirit Box and they're celebrating. The messages are things like "Get Out" and "There is evil here." So, if they think this is real, wouldn't they heed the warning or, at the very least, be concerned?
Beware of any film with an extended party scene. Toward the beginning, the "party" lasts at least 5 minutes, just enough to pad the running time to full-length. It adds nothing of value. The characters are set to film an extremely important investigation the next day, yet they get wasted the night before?
Time has no meaning. The characters are two hours away from the site. Repeatedly, they say, We'll leave first thing in the morning. They arrive at dusk.
This was a complete waste of time. Aside from the Abbey, there's nothing redeeming. I appreciate the attempt to explain the "paranormal" activity but... none of it worked for me.
The story, the acting were all horrible: no believable characters, no believable choices. I spent a lot of time saying, Come on.
For example, the Ghost Hunter-types are actually receiving messages from their Spirit Box and they're celebrating. The messages are things like "Get Out" and "There is evil here." So, if they think this is real, wouldn't they heed the warning or, at the very least, be concerned?
Beware of any film with an extended party scene. Toward the beginning, the "party" lasts at least 5 minutes, just enough to pad the running time to full-length. It adds nothing of value. The characters are set to film an extremely important investigation the next day, yet they get wasted the night before?
Time has no meaning. The characters are two hours away from the site. Repeatedly, they say, We'll leave first thing in the morning. They arrive at dusk.
This was a complete waste of time. Aside from the Abbey, there's nothing redeeming. I appreciate the attempt to explain the "paranormal" activity but... none of it worked for me.
- How long is Night Explorers: The Asylum?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Asilo Mal Assombrado
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 36 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Night Explorers: The Asylum (2023) officially released in India in English?
Answer