Le Droit d'être américain: Histoire d'un combat
Original title: Amend: The Fight for America
IMDb RATING
7.9/10
1.6K
YOUR RATING
Will Smith hosts this look at the evolving, often lethal, fight for equal rights in America through the lens of the US Constitution's 14th Amendment.Will Smith hosts this look at the evolving, often lethal, fight for equal rights in America through the lens of the US Constitution's 14th Amendment.Will Smith hosts this look at the evolving, often lethal, fight for equal rights in America through the lens of the US Constitution's 14th Amendment.
- Awards
- 4 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Watch it and learn about the 14th amendment. Learn about some history. Just be receptive and thats it.
Well worth a watch to learn a little about how the constitution shaped citizenship.
This is a good introduction to the topic of civil rights in the USA during the last two centuries. It's easy to watch, well presented, and has good choices in music and actors/presenters that should make it appealing to those who are not particularly interested in long documentaries about civil rights. That, in itself, is an achievement.
Having said that, I must also point out that this is NOT a definitive guide to the topic it deals with. If you want to get a full history of civil rights in the country, use the documentary as a trampoline to help you reach other, more in-depth works. Because this documentary cuts on some details that in my opinion are very important.
I won't go in too much detail but I think episode 3 (about the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s) is a good example of this. The entire episode focusses on Martin Luther King's efforts to force John F Kennedy to act against racism, and finally the US President gives in and becomes a 'good guy' who does what was required. Two very important angles are missing. Firstly, the documentary makes no mention whatsoever of other civil rights leaders who also played important roles, such as Malcolm X or Stokely Carmichael. And secondly, the fact is that John F Kennedy did very little in the area of human rights, and it was his predecessor, Lyndon B Johnson, who actually implemented the defining civil rights legislation of the 20th century.
Leaving out such figures as Malcolm X or Lyndon Johnson is understandable because they were very complex and controversial characters. For the general public, it is easier to follow a storyline of good guys and bad guys, and Kennedy and King are both established good guys in American imagination. However, this lack of nuance means that the documentary doesn't quite convey how complicated the fight for civil rights really is.
Having said that, I must also point out that this is NOT a definitive guide to the topic it deals with. If you want to get a full history of civil rights in the country, use the documentary as a trampoline to help you reach other, more in-depth works. Because this documentary cuts on some details that in my opinion are very important.
I won't go in too much detail but I think episode 3 (about the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s) is a good example of this. The entire episode focusses on Martin Luther King's efforts to force John F Kennedy to act against racism, and finally the US President gives in and becomes a 'good guy' who does what was required. Two very important angles are missing. Firstly, the documentary makes no mention whatsoever of other civil rights leaders who also played important roles, such as Malcolm X or Stokely Carmichael. And secondly, the fact is that John F Kennedy did very little in the area of human rights, and it was his predecessor, Lyndon B Johnson, who actually implemented the defining civil rights legislation of the 20th century.
Leaving out such figures as Malcolm X or Lyndon Johnson is understandable because they were very complex and controversial characters. For the general public, it is easier to follow a storyline of good guys and bad guys, and Kennedy and King are both established good guys in American imagination. However, this lack of nuance means that the documentary doesn't quite convey how complicated the fight for civil rights really is.
Awesome up to the last episode when Grover Norquist was a spokesman in favor of equality. He has one single agenda, to keep the rich as rich as they can get off of the working class. Beyond his 3 or 4 interjections it was superb in its presentation, its scope and its choice of voices. I have to believe there was some reason GN got face time on this gem.
An in your face, no holds barred walkthrough in the many ways White Supremicist Americans chose to interpret the equality amendment to suit their needs at the time. Be it Black, Asian, Mexican or women, the scared little white men in power use word play to stay relevant and at the top of the financial tree!
Some horrifying historical facts extrapolated for us by a myriad of actors, politicians, public figures and fighters of change demonstrating how the ages changed but the mentality did not! A sad reality of the American Nightmare, that the dream they sold was a scam!
Intelligent, outspoken, truthful and heartfelt this is a must watch for the whole world!
Some horrifying historical facts extrapolated for us by a myriad of actors, politicians, public figures and fighters of change demonstrating how the ages changed but the mentality did not! A sad reality of the American Nightmare, that the dream they sold was a scam!
Intelligent, outspoken, truthful and heartfelt this is a must watch for the whole world!
Did you know
- TriviaJoseph Gordon-Levitt puts voice to Andrew Johnson, Vice-President to Abraham Lincoln. In the movie Lincoln, he played Lincoln's son, Robert.
- How many seasons does Amend: The Fight for America have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Amend: The Fight for America
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content