IMDb RATING
7.1/10
3.8K
YOUR RATING
An exploration of the viewpoint that the September 11, 2001 attacks were planned by the United States government.An exploration of the viewpoint that the September 11, 2001 attacks were planned by the United States government.An exploration of the viewpoint that the September 11, 2001 attacks were planned by the United States government.
Osama bin Laden
- Self - Alleged Mastermind of 9
- (archive footage)
- …
Johnelle Bryant
- Self - USDA Loan Officer in Homestead, Florida
- (archive footage)
George W. Bush
- Self - President of the United States
- (archive footage)
Laura Bush
- Self - First Lady
- (archive footage)
Dick Cheney
- Self
- (archive footage)
Aukai Collins
- Self - Alleged FBI informant in Phoenix
- (archive footage)
Leslie Groves
- Self - Army Corps of Engineers
- (archive footage)
Hamid Gul
- Self - The Former Head of Pakistani Intelligence
- (archive footage)
Hermann Göring
- Self - At Nuremberg Trial
- (archive footage)
Rudolf Hess
- Self - At Nuremberg Trial
- (archive footage)
Adolf Hitler
- Self - German Fuhrer
- (archive footage)
Abdel El M. Husseini
- Self - Arabist
- (archive footage)
Peter Jennings
- Self - ABC Evening News Anchor
- (archive footage)
Lyndon B. Johnson
- Self - Vice President of the USA
- (archive footage)
- (as Lyndon Johnson)
Steven E. Jones
- Self
- (as Stephen Jones)
John F. Kennedy
- Self - Assasinated in Dealy Plaza
- (archive footage)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I've seen all the versions of the "Loose Change 9/11" and this is absolutely the best one. It has the most facts, since more facts have been discovered since the first edition was released. The first edition of "Loose Change 9/11" was actually what made me interested about 9/11 and made me dig into other literature about it. I've seen dozens of videos and read a lot of different articles/debates about it and there is (of course) a lot of speculation and guessing involved. However some facts remain: - Scientists have discovered nano-thermite in the dust from the worldtrade collapses. - 3 highrise, steel-reinforced skyscrapers collapsed into their own footprint at near-freefall speed.
This should be more than enough to argue for a real (truthful) investigation, since these facts can not be explained by the pancake theory.
Then on top of these facts, there are tons of other issues that are just insane coincidences, eyewitneses and other questions that are not answered by the official explanation.
And remember, you can't argue against the facts with questions like: "Yes, but thousands of people should have been involved and so many people can't keep a secret", since this is also just speculation.
This should be more than enough to argue for a real (truthful) investigation, since these facts can not be explained by the pancake theory.
Then on top of these facts, there are tons of other issues that are just insane coincidences, eyewitneses and other questions that are not answered by the official explanation.
And remember, you can't argue against the facts with questions like: "Yes, but thousands of people should have been involved and so many people can't keep a secret", since this is also just speculation.
With Zero and Core of Corruption An American Coup is one of the best films that debunks the official stories of what happen on 9/11. Puts the lie to the "Official Story," which has changed in every major facet a multitude of times, so it must be spoken of in the plural. American Coup retrieves from the memory hole the many eyewitness testimonies which contradict the official lies.
Contrary to the nonsense about how many people would have to be involved to cover up the truth the film explains how compartmentalization is used in black ops. Facts are what matter and the facts can not be explained away by denying it would be impossible for such a coup could take place. It did take place contrary to misinformation from the accessories after the fact in the corporate media.
The movie points out that the Vietnam war was started by a lie. Ignorance is no excuse to deny the overwhelming evidence of government complicity in 9/11. Core of Corruption and Zero should be companion pieces as they dissect the many "coincidences" that cant be ignored by unfurling the shadow governments favorite phrase to pretend it's crimes didn't happen, "conspiracy theory."
Contrary to the nonsense about how many people would have to be involved to cover up the truth the film explains how compartmentalization is used in black ops. Facts are what matter and the facts can not be explained away by denying it would be impossible for such a coup could take place. It did take place contrary to misinformation from the accessories after the fact in the corporate media.
The movie points out that the Vietnam war was started by a lie. Ignorance is no excuse to deny the overwhelming evidence of government complicity in 9/11. Core of Corruption and Zero should be companion pieces as they dissect the many "coincidences" that cant be ignored by unfurling the shadow governments favorite phrase to pretend it's crimes didn't happen, "conspiracy theory."
Simply put, this is the best of the Loose Change permutations so far. All the facts are laid out in clear fashion, and the music soundtrack is thankfully more subdued and muted this time around. The narration by actor Daniel Sunjata is an improvement over director Dylan Avery's sober but somewhat weak turn as narrator of the last Loose Change entry.
All in all an impressive, polished presentation in terms of the look and sound, but, more importantly, it gets most of the important facts out into the forefront.
Foremost amongst these facts are the findings of physicist Steven Jones - PhD, who discovered, along with his team of scientists, explosive/incendiary material in all of the samples of 9/11 dust they have acquired (over 20, from different sources, independent from one another) and how they have proved that this material is a form of highly powerful Nano Thermite which ignites at temperatures high enough to cut through steel. This material is not Sulfur as one commentator erroneously stated. It exists in the form of small chips - gray on one side, red on the other - that ignite at around 430 degrees centigrade, and produce tiny spheres of molten iron of the exact same chemical composition as molten iron produced as a by-product of ignited Thermite. Through a process termed "X-Ray Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy" it has been proved by Jones and his colleagues that the microscopic particles comprising the bulk of the red part of the chips are nano particles (1/1 thousandth the diameter of a human hair) of iron oxide and elemental aluminum - the exact key ingredients of Super Thermite, or Nano Thermite. This is incendiary material that can be made to be explosive when other elements such as Silicon and Carbon are added, and both of those elements were also identified by Jones, et al as being intimately mixed in with the Iron Oxide and Aluminum. Their findings have yet to be adequately refuted by any official investigative body. In fact, none of the four official investigations, including the last and "exhaustively carried out" investigation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology even bothered to look at the dust, nor did they even consider any hypothesis other than collapse due to damage and fire, even though it is required by law to test for explosives in any fire investigation. Some investigation.
So we have a material found in all the dust samples that consists of the exact ingredients of a known material that can cut through steel, that ignites at 430 degrees centigrade, and that produces molten iron spheres as a by-product just like Thermite, but it is not Thermite? If this were not enough, we have pools of molten metal at the bases of all three buildings six weeks after their collapse, and video showing molten metal literally pouring out of the south tower beginning five minutes before it's collapse, and the molten metal looks absolutely and positively like the molten iron produced by Thermite (go to YouTube and type in "Thermite 9/11" to see for yourself). A fact totally ignored by defenders of the official story is that the heat produced by the fires did not exceed 800 degrees Fahrenheit, a temperature far too low to even weaken steel let alone melt it. It seems that they never let the facts get in the way of their faith in the official dogma.
Then there is the testimony of Housing Authority official Barry Jennings, who along with another man by the name of Michael Hess were witnesses to massive explosions inside WTC Seven before either tower had collapsed. As if things were not suspicious enough, Jennings died suddenly last August, two days before the final NIST report on the collapse of WTC Seven was released (NIST said it was due solely to fire - yeah, sure) - it goes on and on and on and on.
Attacks on this documentary, and the whole 9/11 "truth movement" in general, are becoming increasingly ineffectual, indeed embarrassing in light of what we now know.
Dylan Avery and everyone involved in this production are on the right side of history and will be vindicated, in due time, along with all other unbelievers of the official story. Good for them.
All in all an impressive, polished presentation in terms of the look and sound, but, more importantly, it gets most of the important facts out into the forefront.
Foremost amongst these facts are the findings of physicist Steven Jones - PhD, who discovered, along with his team of scientists, explosive/incendiary material in all of the samples of 9/11 dust they have acquired (over 20, from different sources, independent from one another) and how they have proved that this material is a form of highly powerful Nano Thermite which ignites at temperatures high enough to cut through steel. This material is not Sulfur as one commentator erroneously stated. It exists in the form of small chips - gray on one side, red on the other - that ignite at around 430 degrees centigrade, and produce tiny spheres of molten iron of the exact same chemical composition as molten iron produced as a by-product of ignited Thermite. Through a process termed "X-Ray Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy" it has been proved by Jones and his colleagues that the microscopic particles comprising the bulk of the red part of the chips are nano particles (1/1 thousandth the diameter of a human hair) of iron oxide and elemental aluminum - the exact key ingredients of Super Thermite, or Nano Thermite. This is incendiary material that can be made to be explosive when other elements such as Silicon and Carbon are added, and both of those elements were also identified by Jones, et al as being intimately mixed in with the Iron Oxide and Aluminum. Their findings have yet to be adequately refuted by any official investigative body. In fact, none of the four official investigations, including the last and "exhaustively carried out" investigation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology even bothered to look at the dust, nor did they even consider any hypothesis other than collapse due to damage and fire, even though it is required by law to test for explosives in any fire investigation. Some investigation.
So we have a material found in all the dust samples that consists of the exact ingredients of a known material that can cut through steel, that ignites at 430 degrees centigrade, and that produces molten iron spheres as a by-product just like Thermite, but it is not Thermite? If this were not enough, we have pools of molten metal at the bases of all three buildings six weeks after their collapse, and video showing molten metal literally pouring out of the south tower beginning five minutes before it's collapse, and the molten metal looks absolutely and positively like the molten iron produced by Thermite (go to YouTube and type in "Thermite 9/11" to see for yourself). A fact totally ignored by defenders of the official story is that the heat produced by the fires did not exceed 800 degrees Fahrenheit, a temperature far too low to even weaken steel let alone melt it. It seems that they never let the facts get in the way of their faith in the official dogma.
Then there is the testimony of Housing Authority official Barry Jennings, who along with another man by the name of Michael Hess were witnesses to massive explosions inside WTC Seven before either tower had collapsed. As if things were not suspicious enough, Jennings died suddenly last August, two days before the final NIST report on the collapse of WTC Seven was released (NIST said it was due solely to fire - yeah, sure) - it goes on and on and on and on.
Attacks on this documentary, and the whole 9/11 "truth movement" in general, are becoming increasingly ineffectual, indeed embarrassing in light of what we now know.
Dylan Avery and everyone involved in this production are on the right side of history and will be vindicated, in due time, along with all other unbelievers of the official story. Good for them.
If you're looking for lies and disinformation, this is where to find it. These goofs have been disapproved time in and time out. However, the arrogance and Jason and Dylan are so thick it makes impressionable young dorks interested.
This is how idiotaracy begins.
This is how idiotaracy begins.
First of all when you watch this or if you have already, then keep one thing in mind, ... this film quite literally names countless people as being "in on it" or "having inside knowledge" including the FDNY (who risked and sacrificed their lives that day) to a BBC News Station because a reporter said the WTC7 had collapsed 20 minutes before it did. For one thing, I seriously doubt our government would let a European news station in on them being the mastermind behind the worst attack on US soil since Pearl Harbor. Seriously? Also, go watch the news reports again, everyone was talking about the WTC7 coming down because the firefighters heard it groaning and it was fully engulfed and had a giant chunk taken out of it. The news station misunderstood "It will come down" for "It has come down", due to how many people the news passed through on the way to the reporter. They also claim that no plane hit the pentagon and that it must have been a cruise missile despite all the eye witnesses and a number of light post that were knocked down, which could have only occurred if the missile did some serious zig zag maneuvering to hit them before striking the pentagon. I think a planes wingspan hitting them seems more logical. Go type in 911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77 in youtube and you will get a very clear picture of what happened. I could go on and on, but if you take some time to research yourselves then it's not hard to find the facts. However, if you want a good place to go with a great presentation of the facts then you can visit http://www.youtube.com/user/RKOwens4 . It contains several videos closely examining the different accusations and even sheds some light on new information.
Did you know
- TriviaThe argument that the steel just needed to be softened enough to collapse has been put forward, but has not mentioned what happened to building 7, that did not get hit at all, and while it was stated that 7 was hit by falling debris, this would have meant that the debris completely by passed building 6 and then heated the steel structure of 7 enough to collapse.
No logical and technical explanation has been put forward for this.
- GoofsIt is mentioned that Smedley Butler was an Army Veteran. However, Spedley Butler was a U.S. Marine Veteran and never joined the Army.
- ConnectionsFeatures ABC Evening News (1953)
- Is it true that there is no precedent historically for zero wreckage at the site of impact for a large plane crash as noted?
- Retired Marines Major General Smedley D. Butler was noted as being asked to lead a coup against the U.S., what substantiates this?
- What is the temperature required to melt steel? How hot does jet fuel burn at?
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $50,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 39 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content