[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Episode guide
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Deadliest Warrior

  • TV Series
  • 2009–2011
  • 42m
IMDb RATING
7.5/10
3.6K
YOUR RATING
Deadliest Warrior (2009)
For the last face-off of the season, "Deadliest Warrior" pits vampires versus zombies. See which undead creature comes out on top as part of the supersized season finale, airing at 9pm Wednesday, Sept. 14 on cable's Spike.
Play clip2:37
Watch Vampires vs. Zombies Claw Test
1 Video
56 Photos
ActionGame ShowHistory

The great warriors of history are examined for fantasy combat simulations.The great warriors of history are examined for fantasy combat simulations.The great warriors of history are examined for fantasy combat simulations.

  • Creator
    • Timothy Prokop
  • Stars
    • Geoff Desmoulin
    • Armand Dorian
    • Max Geiger
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    7.5/10
    3.6K
    YOUR RATING
    • Creator
      • Timothy Prokop
    • Stars
      • Geoff Desmoulin
      • Armand Dorian
      • Max Geiger
    • 30User reviews
    • 5Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Episodes33

    Browse episodes
    TopTop-rated

    Videos1

    Vampires vs. Zombies Claw Test
    Clip 2:37
    Vampires vs. Zombies Claw Test

    Photos56

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 50
    View Poster

    Top cast99+

    Edit
    Geoff Desmoulin
    • Self - Host…
    • 2009–2011
    Armand Dorian
    • Self…
    • 2009–2011
    Max Geiger
    • Self - Computer Programmer…
    • 2009–2010
    Richard Machowicz
    Richard Machowicz
    • Self - Host…
    • 2011
    David Lain Baker
    David Lain Baker
    • Self…
    • 2011
    Sonny Sison
    • Al Capone…
    • 2009–2010
    David Wenham
    David Wenham
    • Narrator
    • 2009
    Shaun Paul Piccinino
    Shaun Paul Piccinino
    • William Wallace…
    • 2009–2010
    Robert Daley
    • Self - Combat Engine Designer…
    • 2011
    Ardeshir Radpour
    Ardeshir Radpour
    • Hernan Cortes…
    • 2010–2011
    Ryan T. Husk
    Ryan T. Husk
    • British Soldier…
    • 2009
    Bryan Forrest
    Bryan Forrest
    • Conquistador…
    • 2010–2011
    Mathew Lorenceau
    Mathew Lorenceau
    • French Foreign Legion Hero…
    • 2009–2011
    Westley Nguyen
    • Khmer Rouge Soldier…
    • 2009–2011
    Andrew Rasputin
    • Spetsnaz Leader…
    • 2009–2010
    Mike Mayhall
    Mike Mayhall
    • IRA Member…
    • 2009
    Aaron Schoenke
    Aaron Schoenke
    • Apache…
    • 2009
    Jason Nguyen
    Jason Nguyen
    • Asian Weapons Expert…
    • 2010–2011
    • Creator
      • Timothy Prokop
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews30

    7.53.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    7kstulik

    Decent Entertainment

    Deadliest Warrior turns out to be decent schlock entertainment, but like many good contemporary shows, turns out to be fairly informative. The notion that you could actually determine who is the deadliest warrior in history is silly, not because they compare warriors from completely different times who could've never met anyway, but rather because the match-ups are all out of context -- Gladiator vs. Apache? C'mon.

    The show features a few regulars and then some guest warriors who specialize not only in knowledge of the particular warriors but who also are masters of the particular fighting styles and weapons of their particular historical warrior as well. The two different modern warrior groups usually trash-talk each other in goofy machismo fashion; I think they're being serious but it's good for a laugh.

    Each show demonstrates the period weapons and their capability against fairly realistic human analogs. For instance, they smash in the head of a dummy with a tomahawk, and the dummy is a simulated skull with simulated brain matter surrounded by ballistics gel. When the skull flies apart, so does the brain matter; it's pretty graphic even though it's just a dummy. There are a few extremely impressive demonstrations of skill by the guest warriors, so that's cool to see.

    The "computer program" they run at the end to determine who would win the most times out of 1000 appears to be some cheesy spreadsheet. I'm sure there's more to it, but they offer zero in terms of methodology, adding to the goofiness. The final battle simulation at the very end is pretty cool though, and it nicely ties in all of the weapons that were tested in the lab.

    In all, I gave this show a 7 because despite several cornball facets to it, it really is entertaining to watch, occasionally funny, pretty interesting and -- the best part -- informative. I watch it with my two middle-school sons and they love it, and the show always evokes some good discussions of martial history between us. Oh, and although I can find no indication of who the narrator is, it sounds exactly like David Wenham from 300.
    7SnoopyStyle

    drunk history

    This is a Spike TV show. Its inspiration comes from drunk arguments or smoke pontifications. What would happen if two different types of historical warriors who never came into contact actually get into a fight? It's a fun idea. The audience is introduce to a minimal history lesson, a few weapons from each fighter, and a faux simulation of the fight. The history lesson is only interesting for the less-known fighters. The weapons testing is the most interesting section. There are a few really obscure weapons. I've never seen the Chinese repeating crossbow. The Rajput weapons are weird. They also get to blow up stuff, slice and dice, and play with guns. The last section is the simulation section. It's the section that one could skip over. It's LARPing.

    The third season tries to personalize the warriors by pinpointing historical leaders. It gives some unnecessary personal data and battle strategy. If you're comparing Joan of Arc with William the Conqueror, the personal size difference is of little interest to me. The battle strategy is intriguing in theory but this show is unable to do an in-depth dive into that subject matter. The show is grasping at straws by this point and Vampires vs. Zombies is the definition of jumping the shark. It's a fun little show while it lasted.
    noblegrand41

    question accuracy

    As others have stated there are certain problems with each separate episode. As an example Al Capone vs. Jesse James. There were no handguns used by Al Capone which was inaccurate. The use of the Chicago typewriter had all ammunition used in one continuous burst -- which action could be questioned. The Chicago typewriter could have been fired in shorter bursts to allow more accurate along with more sustained firepower without reloading.

    In this episode Al Capone could have carried a Colt .45 1911 or other handgun. There would have been a difference in the amount of handgun firepower between a Colt .45 1911 and a Colt .45 Peacemaker revolver.

    Also either side could have been armed with a 10 or 12 gauge shotgun which could have also made a difference in the outcome. In my opinion all avenues were not explored or considered.

    In other episodes there seems to be questions in regards to individual combat vs. warriors who are used to fighting in groups. There are many differences in methods used during these confrontations, which should be taken into consideration along with an individual person's ability.
    7dorotka24

    Action heavy, logic lapsed

    I must first say about this series that the premise is outstanding, and one that has crossed my mind on numerous occasions. What would happen if a medieval knight met up with a samurai? Who would be victorious in battle?

    The show then attempts to determine whom is the better warrior amongst two different kinds in history - in many cases two warriors that are separated by many centuries. The arms and armors available to these warriors are demonstrated, both in their lethal potential or in their stopping power in the case of armor. The demonstrations are fascinating, including weapons experts that strike or fire their weapons at ballistics gel encased, and presumably reproduction skeletons. A physician or medical specialist then examines the footage, or the dummy in some cases, and describes the type of trauma inflicted. At the end, we get a well choreographed fight between two re-enactors dressed in costume to simulate the potential outcome of such a contest, as well as a statistics model that determines the winner in 1,000 contests. I like this concept because despite the advantages a particular warrior might possess over another, the randomness of combat will ensure that even the presumably better warrior will lose at least a percentage of the time.

    The problems with the show are many, however, and seriously challenge the credibility of the participants. As others have pointed out, a warrior is more than the sum of his weapons and armor, which the show spends the most amount of time demonstrating. I think the premise could be dropped and have the show focus on weapons demonstrations only. Although the mindset, culture, tactics, and goals of each warrior are mentioned, these descriptions are brief and superficial. In addition,the hypothetical combats displayed are all duels. Most of the warriors portrayed would rarely, if ever, be faced with a duel situation, instead fighting in a unit of many soldiers/warriors. The worst part for me has to be the banter or trash talk between the weapons experts representing each respective warrior. It reminds me of a WWE matchup or a pre-boxing/MMA trash session instead of a presumably serious and/or scientific look at a hypothetical combat situation.

    At any rate, I do enjoy the show because it has many good aspects. But the flaws do not make for "must-see" TV. If they would focus a little more on the tactics, drop the banter, and perhaps consider tactical unit combat instead of duels, I believe the show would be much improved. The producers are obviously trying to cater to a younger, action thirsty crowd, perhaps in an effort to make history more interesting. I applaud this rationale if nothing else, but the more discriminating viewers with a desire for logical and factual history, such as myself, are often left wanting.

    If any wish for a superior show with similarities to DW, check out an earlier History Channel series called "Conquest" with Peter Woodward. The latter is more mature, yet still with some light hearted moments. It covers nearly every criticism I have for DW and then some (see my review).

    EDIT: I had not seen Season 3 prior to this original review, and S3 does cover some of my criticisms for the first two Seasons. The banter here has been toned down substantially and the combats all consist of units fighting each other. The warrior's mindsets, values, and motivations are explored with the addition of Richard Machowicz. I also liked the addition of the "X Factors" as well, or somewhat intangible characteristics such as mental health or physical fitness which could positively or negatively impact a side's performance. Overall the changes added a more serious and scientific component to the show that was a substantial improvement IMO.

    There are still a few problems that I saw, particularly with the tendency to match two opponents who were not a very good matchup to begin with. Hannibal and Genghis Khan was a good example, as they were separated by nearly 1,400 years and Khan's armor and weapons technology was far superior. Same could be said of William the Conqueror and Joan of Arc. It was a little silly to see a unit of five men firing a heavy artillery piece at each other as well. The elite modern soldiers did not have weapons that they most likely would have carried. I am particularly thinking about the Rangers/North Korea and Gurkha/French Foreign Legion in that all these soldiers would have probably carried hand grenades and a pistol of some kind. Roosevelt/Lawrence of Arabia or even Washington/Napolean would have probably had pistols as well. Oddly enough, only Pancho Villa/Crazy Horse were depicted carrying pistols.

    In general, the format changes in S3 were an improvement and I enjoyed it quite a bit more than the previous seasons.
    6mike-ryan455

    Fun, but not accurate

    Don't get me wrong. This ranks up there with my other low brow comedy shows on Spike like "1,000 ways to die." It's great for something to relax to, and watching people get splattered makes it all the more fun. But accurate it is not.

    Their firearms knowledge is ludicrous. For example, on the Yakuza vs. Mafia episode they stated the Yakuza used the Walther P-38 pistol. Yet the graphics they showed were of a P-08 Luger. These are two totally, totally different looking pistols designed close to half a century apart. They had the IRA carrying a Boer War period .455 Webley revolver and they touted its reliability over a Makarov. I own both. There is no comparison between the Makarov and the Webley. You can't hit the broad side of a barn with a Webley.

    They do not test uniformly. In the Yakuza vs. Mafia episode, the Mafia had six machine gun targets they had to hit with the Thompson. The Yakuza only had four they had to hit with a Sten. That gave the Sten an easier score. Worse still, they used completely different ways of testing the Russian hand grenade and the US hand grenade. Why not do something logical - put three pig carcases up in an enclosed room and see how each grenade does? It's a uniform test? I shouldn't expect too much from Spike. It's unabashedly guy TV, and I like that. But they could do a lot better job with a little more care.

    More like this

    1000 Ways to Die
    6.8
    1000 Ways to Die
    To Catch a Predator
    8.1
    To Catch a Predator
    Tosh.0
    7.3
    Tosh.0
    The Legend of Calamity Jane
    6.9
    The Legend of Calamity Jane
    Survivorman
    8.2
    Survivorman
    Pimp My Ride US
    5.7
    Pimp My Ride US
    Seul face à la nature
    8.1
    Seul face à la nature
    Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction
    7.9
    Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction
    Ridiculousness
    6.3
    Ridiculousness
    The Andy Milonakis Show
    5.7
    The Andy Milonakis Show
    South Park: The Streaming Wars Part 2
    6.7
    South Park: The Streaming Wars Part 2
    Celebrity Deathmatch
    6.9
    Celebrity Deathmatch

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      This show first aired April 2009. It quickly became the number one show on Spike.
    • Quotes

      [repeated line]

      Narrator: Who will be the deadliest warrior?

    • Connections
      Featured in How TV Ruined Your Life: Knowledge (2011)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ

    • How many seasons does Deadliest Warrior have?
      Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • March 10, 2009 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • El guerrero más letal
    • Filming locations
      • Los Angeles, California, USA
    • Production companies
      • 44 Blue Productions
      • Morningstar Entertainment
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      42 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Dolby SR
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    Deadliest Warrior (2009)
    Top Gap
    By what name was Deadliest Warrior (2009) officially released in India in English?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit pageAdd episode

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.