The film suffers from a profoundly disorganized narrative and an underdeveloped screenplay, which undermines any attempt at cohesive storytelling. The amateurish quality of the script suggests a fundamental lack of structural understanding. Compounding these issues, the cinematography is remarkably ineffective. It demonstrates a notable deficiency in visual storytelling, with shots frequently lacking purpose or connection to the broader narrative. The judicious use of B-roll and panning, crucial elements for establishing context and mood, is conspicuously absent. Instead, the visual language often devolves into an almost commercial-like aesthetic, characterized by repetitive and uninspired close-ups, appearing with distracting frequency. A study of established cinematic benchmarks, such as the epic scale and intricate visual narratives of The Lord of the Rings trilogy or the dynamic compositions within the Marvel Cinematic Universe, would be beneficial for the filmmakers. Ultimately, the narrative's derivative nature, coupled with its disjointed execution, implies that the scriptwriter either misunderstood or failed to adequately engage with the classical inspirations purportedly informing the story.
