IMDb RATING
7.8/10
7.7K
YOUR RATING
England in the age of the Vikings is a fractured nation of petty lords and warring kingdoms. Beneath the chaos lies a rich and untamed land waiting for a new conqueror. Will it be you?England in the age of the Vikings is a fractured nation of petty lords and warring kingdoms. Beneath the chaos lies a rich and untamed land waiting for a new conqueror. Will it be you?England in the age of the Vikings is a fractured nation of petty lords and warring kingdoms. Beneath the chaos lies a rich and untamed land waiting for a new conqueror. Will it be you?
- Nominated for 1 BAFTA Award
- 15 nominations total
Cecilie Stenspil
- Eivor (Female)
- (voice)
- …
Magnus Bruun
- Eivor (Male)
- (voice)
- …
Carlo Rota
- Basim
- (voice)
- …
Gaia Weiss
- Fulke
- (voice)
Gudmundur Thorvaldsson
- Sigurd
- (voice)
- …
Tom Lewis
- King Aelfred
- (voice)
Allan Corduner
- Trygve
- (voice)
Andrew Shaver
- Stowe
- (voice)
Aron Már Ólafsson
- Erke
- (voice)
- …
Björn Bengtsson
- Kjotve
- (voice)
- …
Boris Hiestand
- Rued
- (voice)
- …
Chantel Riley
- Layla Hassan
- (voice)
Christian Svensson
- Ubba
- (voice)
- …
Curtis Legault
- Rollo
- (voice)
Cody Bellinger
- Otta
- (voice)
Danny Wallace
- Shaun Hastings
- (voice)
David Menkin
- Dag
- (voice)
Einar Selvik
- Bragi
- (voice)
Featured reviews
I like it so far don't get me wrong, but this game is lacking something for it to be an actual assassins creed game. The equipment all the same, none of it has "special qualities" and if you equip a pointless rune it may or may not trigger that special rune ability, you are dependent on if you have ability stamina for abilities which yeah good luck,. Not very good really. Definitely not loving this version at all, and the DLC content, no meat to it, not worth the extra you pay for it.
I have been waiting for this game all year and I'm sorry to say I'm very disappointed with it. It almost feels as though it's release was very rushed. The game is full of a lot of "nearly" moments. It nearly meets expectations with various features but falls short. Sadly, the combat is not great. Very clunky fighting. I was a huge fan of AC Odyssey and had high hopes for this game. Sadly it falls short.
The worst thing is that there are so many things in this game (raids, battles...) that are so promising but certain things take away from it. The audio during battles is not great. When raiding a village, you expect to hear loud metal clashing, shouting from panicked civilians and war cries. However, the audio during battle scenes is very underwhelming, which detracts from the concept of raiding.
Overall, this was a "nearly" game. With such great concepts and things to do, it "nearly" achieved them, but fell short.
So far it's ok.
To be honest it's a little boring and I dont think it's sets a good example for "next gen". I have it on Xbox Series X and I have come under multiple bugs were certain missions are unplayable. Npc animations are not the best I have seen arms moving the wrong direction, objects floating in peoples hands and arrows stuck in characters face during cut scenes. There has also been alot of sound synchronisation issues. The polish contrary to what review companies are saying is not there!
The story so far is also not the best I would have liked greater character depth.
Dont get me wrong I like the assasins creed universe I think the world they have created is good but so many other open world games are available and for a £60 price tag I expected a bit more.
I think ubisoft like other companies should have delayed this project rather than use it a opportunity to be one of the only launch titles on boths consoles.
To be honest it's a little boring and I dont think it's sets a good example for "next gen". I have it on Xbox Series X and I have come under multiple bugs were certain missions are unplayable. Npc animations are not the best I have seen arms moving the wrong direction, objects floating in peoples hands and arrows stuck in characters face during cut scenes. There has also been alot of sound synchronisation issues. The polish contrary to what review companies are saying is not there!
The story so far is also not the best I would have liked greater character depth.
Dont get me wrong I like the assasins creed universe I think the world they have created is good but so many other open world games are available and for a £60 price tag I expected a bit more.
I think ubisoft like other companies should have delayed this project rather than use it a opportunity to be one of the only launch titles on boths consoles.
I fell completely in love with this game despite the few tiny bugs that I encountered. The gameplay is on point and it a beautiful game. Everything was peachy until the last time I continued the game and ended up loosing 7 hrs of progress due to their save glitches. The game in my opinion is unplayable with it's current bugs.
This was a beautifully made game. Amazing graphics, good ideas, brilliant design and colours and textures. I was happier with this instalment than the last as it is actually related to the assassins creed world. There were assassins, hidden blades, templars, a big alien temple and an actual ending of sorts with a lead into the next game.
While I did enjoy this game and its story The downsides to this game were extensive. This game was way too long, by the time I had finished my gameplay hours had reached over 200. There was still absolutely no story outside of the animus, they appear to have just given up with that completely now which is a real shame. I'm still sick of this optional choice gameplay. It's meant to be a reenactment of history, a story that's already happened but there giving you choices on what to say and do on every interaction. They also still let you choose the gender. Can't you just write in two characters like with syndicate? Or make a game centred around a woman for once? But my biggest complaint is, when I started this game I had no idea what was going on. This is because I hadn't bought the overly priced optional DLC for the previous game which actually has the games ending in it. And after completing over 200 hours of gameplay on this game I discover there's another £50 worth of add on missions to buy. Well no. It wasn't even that enjoyable anyway.
I also got annoyed by all the over the top outfits. I attempted to play this game while keeping my character looking consistent to the setting and timeframe while Ubisoft are changing even the basic characteristics of an assassins creed game. I'm missing the original hooded costumes and the easier stealth mode. For the last 3 games including this one there more focused on loud over the top combat and less on what made the AC games unique, which was the stealth gameplay.
Some more positive notes:
While I did enjoy this game and its story The downsides to this game were extensive. This game was way too long, by the time I had finished my gameplay hours had reached over 200. There was still absolutely no story outside of the animus, they appear to have just given up with that completely now which is a real shame. I'm still sick of this optional choice gameplay. It's meant to be a reenactment of history, a story that's already happened but there giving you choices on what to say and do on every interaction. They also still let you choose the gender. Can't you just write in two characters like with syndicate? Or make a game centred around a woman for once? But my biggest complaint is, when I started this game I had no idea what was going on. This is because I hadn't bought the overly priced optional DLC for the previous game which actually has the games ending in it. And after completing over 200 hours of gameplay on this game I discover there's another £50 worth of add on missions to buy. Well no. It wasn't even that enjoyable anyway.
I also got annoyed by all the over the top outfits. I attempted to play this game while keeping my character looking consistent to the setting and timeframe while Ubisoft are changing even the basic characteristics of an assassins creed game. I'm missing the original hooded costumes and the easier stealth mode. For the last 3 games including this one there more focused on loud over the top combat and less on what made the AC games unique, which was the stealth gameplay.
Some more positive notes:
- The controls themselves were pretty easy to use.
- I enjoyed the era and the location
- a diverse and choice of weapons and outfits despite my personal dislike for a fair few of them
- enjoyed the cameos of some more historical figures.
Did you know
- TriviaMagnus Bruun, Bjorn Bengtsson, Jeppe Beck Laursen, Harry McEntyre, Thomas W. Gabrielsson & Simon Krogh Stenspil were all in The Last Kingdom playing Cnut, Sigefrid, Haesten, Aethelwold, Guthrum & Dagfinn respectively while Gaia Weiss, Eric Johnson, Charlie Kelly, Diarmaid Murtagh, Kris Holden-Ried, Ragga Ragnars & Einar Selvik appeared in Vikings, playing Thorunn, Erik the Red, Egil the Bastard, Leif, Eyvind, Gunnhild & the Shaman respectively. Erik Madsen appeared in both as Fiske and king Hemming respectively.
- GoofsA character named Hysind the World-Wise says that the white cliffs of Dover are famous for their bluebirds. There are no bluebirds in England, the connection only exists because of the song (There'll Be Bluebirds Over) The White Cliffs of Dover. This game is set in 873 and the song was released over a millennium later in 1941.
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- Assassin's Creed: Valhalla
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 16 : 9
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content