Cry Havoc

This film is shot well, has the expected level of B-movie gore and nudity, and the plot itself is not bad. The acting is pretty terrible from all sides other than Robert Bronzi and Richard Tyson. In the version I watched, it seemed like they stuck a voice-over on Bronzi which really takes away from the film and feels stiff and fake. Bronzi has a nice voice and can act, why did they do this? If you like gore and modern sploitation films, this is passable. Cinematic gold it ain't.

The movie might not have a good story, but on the other hand it has endless running around in the woods, a ridiculously edgy villain, and a really de-saturated look that gets old quick.

Why these kind of movies are made and howcome they sell so good is a real mystery to me. its for the blood and gore galore lovers and as to the content , with all its psychopathy and sosiopathy supplied by a mere manic hooded something, that has crashed through a metal fence, not able to remove the barbs and spikes as theyve melted into the beasts face. there are loads of attractive females with bare breast and allsorts, but the beast appears like a twelve year old boy and shadows away from the beautifullness, and instead wrench,stabs and chops the living daylights from them poor things. its not entertainment thinks the grumpy old man, cannibal holocoust from the 70's appears like a oscar candidate compared to this 2020 junk.

productionwise its just bad, lightsetting and soundwork are terrible, acting and story are relentlessly missing and wheres the plotmotion when everyone gets killed anyway from start to end.

i shall not elaborate on junk like this, just say that robert bronzi appears in this film, and he is the fantastic spitting image of charles bronson, and my only wish must be that some serious filmgiant gives this man a chance in a well written and directed blockbuster sometimes in the future, because he can actually jogg and shoot and hit .

its a no recommend to all the sane and sound among us

There is a lot that's actually good here so let's do that.

The good:

The Gore: It's good and there's a lot of it.

The Plot: What you do get isn't bad.

The Acting: Minus dubbed Bronzi it's fine

The Bad:

The Plot: Remember how I said what is there is good?

Well there is so little of it that it becomes a massive negative.

It starts with a random kill and the random kills happen at random and do not stop throughout the movie.

You don't get any plot until you finally follow the reporter and then she's immediately thrown away for dubbed porn action scenes.

The Action: So the gore is impressive, but the action is so unserious (especially in comparison to everything else) that it just looks and feels wrong all of the time.

Ultimately the gore is good. But if the plot of your movie is just more meat for your grinder your movie is bad.

There are no characters. Just annoyance that the one the plot centers around isn't one.

While the slasher parts are good, the backstory of It or Havoc could be built better. Actors and actresses seem to be amateurs. Very horrible acting. Also can we talk about the motorcycle scene? Like wtf? Dont watch. I give this movie a one cause i made it painfully through the whole thing