IMDb RATING
1.6/10
8.6K
YOUR RATING
Two neurology students create a telepathy experiment together to visualize a murderer, who recently knifed another student.Two neurology students create a telepathy experiment together to visualize a murderer, who recently knifed another student.Two neurology students create a telepathy experiment together to visualize a murderer, who recently knifed another student.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
This is the movie that high school students watch to see all the dreadfully horrendous things that could happen in their drama videos. Extremely bad lighting which casts deep shadows everywhere, there is no concept of back lighting. The audio is poor with the sound being echoed and blurred making it very difficult to hear the actors. White paper is constantly used in props to make extremely unrealistic MRI Scanners, computers, half formed bedrooms and offices. Real bedrooms with fancy ceiling lights are used as clinic rooms. Industrial basements used in the film are half covered showing drain pipes, dirty brick walls and filthy floors with office furniture consisting of 2 deck chairs. The acting is so static you would think that they were talking statues. I expected the actors to move rather than be glued in place. The editing of this film is so bad that every edit makes you believe you are in a different scene. The editing makes you feel that you are randomly jumping about in time in 5 second intervals. In conclusion this film is absolute garbage and the rating has definitely been rigged.
i hate this movie. lighting is terrible, sets are terrible, the acting is terrible, everything is terrible.
this movie had a budget of 5 million dollars, with that money a decent director could have made a good low budget, instead this guy has spent all the money on cardboard and terrible animation.
the actors look like someone is pointing a live firearm at them off set. the production design is terrible, you can see the seams of the set. the editing jumps around not really doing anything to further the. a plot by the way i still to this day i don't understand. if i could give it something it looks like the maker of this film tried, and sort of cared about this film, but it doesn't look like he knows anything about filmmaking
don't see this movie.
this movie had a budget of 5 million dollars, with that money a decent director could have made a good low budget, instead this guy has spent all the money on cardboard and terrible animation.
the actors look like someone is pointing a live firearm at them off set. the production design is terrible, you can see the seams of the set. the editing jumps around not really doing anything to further the. a plot by the way i still to this day i don't understand. if i could give it something it looks like the maker of this film tried, and sort of cared about this film, but it doesn't look like he knows anything about filmmaking
don't see this movie.
In this review I am not going to talk about the film at all really but rather the pathetic attempts by the team to cover up this frankly sh1t film.
Now before anyone complains, let it be known that I love film as an art-form and even when I think the film is 'bad', if the team has at least worked hard and clearly tried their hardest I can normally respect them. However, writing fake reviews to trick people into watching is NOT ACCEPTABLE! I'm not going to pretend I can see inside the directors head but all I know is that something is wrong with these scores...
Votes Percentage Rating 5833 89.1% 10 45 0.7% 9 22 0.3% 8 18 0.3% 7 12 0.2% 6 8 0.1% 5 7 0.1% 4 10 0.2% 3 53 0.8% 2 537 8.2% 1
WOW!Over 89% on 10 / 10, must be a masterpiece right, seriously guys just watch the trailer and see if you can spot a problem in this. The other problem that should be immediately clear is how the next highest percentage is 8.2 at 1... pretty big split no, I don't think I've ever seen one that large in fact like EVER!
I'm sick of even thinking about this sh1t right now. I know you might be thinking "but Max what sucked about the film" so i'll answer...
Everying!!! Nuff said. If you want to know the specific problems please read someone else's review, except filter by worst first as then you wont get Mr. Reigon and his crew attempting to glorify this crock of sh1t
One final bit of trivia for you, did you know that the budget of this film was $5,000,000 and that only $30,000 of it was actually spent on the film, with the other $4,970,000 all going into CGI. Huh interesting but one thing Mr. Reigon...
3D modeling software does not attribute to $4,970,000! 'Blender' alone is free and while I'm sure the software you use is better than that, it may interest you to know that the software Disney uses is but a fraction of that (e.g. Autodesk Maya = little over $1,400 for industry level animation).
Please play this clip of $4,000,000+ animation www.you tube.com/watch?v=UqIewqGUdOM After last season funniest scene {sorry for bad quality, best I could find quickly}
I'm sorry Mr. Reigon could you attempt to I don't know, try, in the future. To everyone else, stop watching this film it is probably an embezzlement scam and you are giving this... 'individual' money.
Now before anyone complains, let it be known that I love film as an art-form and even when I think the film is 'bad', if the team has at least worked hard and clearly tried their hardest I can normally respect them. However, writing fake reviews to trick people into watching is NOT ACCEPTABLE! I'm not going to pretend I can see inside the directors head but all I know is that something is wrong with these scores...
Votes Percentage Rating 5833 89.1% 10 45 0.7% 9 22 0.3% 8 18 0.3% 7 12 0.2% 6 8 0.1% 5 7 0.1% 4 10 0.2% 3 53 0.8% 2 537 8.2% 1
WOW!Over 89% on 10 / 10, must be a masterpiece right, seriously guys just watch the trailer and see if you can spot a problem in this. The other problem that should be immediately clear is how the next highest percentage is 8.2 at 1... pretty big split no, I don't think I've ever seen one that large in fact like EVER!
I'm sick of even thinking about this sh1t right now. I know you might be thinking "but Max what sucked about the film" so i'll answer...
Everying!!! Nuff said. If you want to know the specific problems please read someone else's review, except filter by worst first as then you wont get Mr. Reigon and his crew attempting to glorify this crock of sh1t
One final bit of trivia for you, did you know that the budget of this film was $5,000,000 and that only $30,000 of it was actually spent on the film, with the other $4,970,000 all going into CGI. Huh interesting but one thing Mr. Reigon...
3D modeling software does not attribute to $4,970,000! 'Blender' alone is free and while I'm sure the software you use is better than that, it may interest you to know that the software Disney uses is but a fraction of that (e.g. Autodesk Maya = little over $1,400 for industry level animation).
Please play this clip of $4,000,000+ animation www.you tube.com/watch?v=UqIewqGUdOM After last season funniest scene {sorry for bad quality, best I could find quickly}
I'm sorry Mr. Reigon could you attempt to I don't know, try, in the future. To everyone else, stop watching this film it is probably an embezzlement scam and you are giving this... 'individual' money.
I bought this film after seeing the fake reviews from the director biggest mistake of my life. I paid money to see this pile of drek thinking I was going to see a good movie or at least a passable one but no what I got was the nightmare hell spawn known as after last season. Where to start with this "film" and I use that term lightly. So the lighting and editing are terrible,the acting is abysmal, and the sets are all made out of cardboard. I'd be OK with this if it had a small budget or if this movie was old but none of those are true it was released in 2009, and it has a budget of five million dollars, just think about it someone paid five million dollars to make this pile of drek that's more then ill ever own in my life and it was used to make a crappy film that looks worse then than films I made with my friends when I was ten unacceptable. So if you see a positive review on this film it's just the director trying to make his crap film look good.
In the pantheon of bad movies there are some that stand out due to notoriety like "Plan 9 From Outer Space", cult favorites like "The Room" or just plain WTF like "Actium Maximus: War of the Alien Dinosaurs". These, or "Grade Z" movies are typically considered "so bad they're good" meaning you can enjoy them unironically because they transcend badness and come out the other end as something you need to see.
Make no mistake, this is not one of those movies. After Last Season is bad. Really bad. The acting is bad. The dialogue is bad. The sets are bad. The sound is bad. There is literally nothing good about it. And how this cost $5 million I will never know.
The story makes no sense. I've watched it twice now and I'm still not getting the whole point of... anything. Things just happen. People speak like aliens who know English but can't speak it properly to save their lives.
The sets are half the time just cardboard and sheets of paper. I'm not kidding. The MRI at the start? A bunch of cardboard boxes and paper. The MRI pictures on the wall? Just a bunch of printouts taped up. Doors are covered in paper for unknown reasons. Signs that are obviously just taped to the wall indicate business names. This was obviously shot in a house and in some warehouse somewhere but there are ways make this not quite so obvious.
It's not even enjoyable as a bad movie because it's just so inept without the putrid charm that "The Room" or "Birdemic: Shock and Horror" has.
Give this one a pass. You'll thank me later.
Make no mistake, this is not one of those movies. After Last Season is bad. Really bad. The acting is bad. The dialogue is bad. The sets are bad. The sound is bad. There is literally nothing good about it. And how this cost $5 million I will never know.
The story makes no sense. I've watched it twice now and I'm still not getting the whole point of... anything. Things just happen. People speak like aliens who know English but can't speak it properly to save their lives.
The sets are half the time just cardboard and sheets of paper. I'm not kidding. The MRI at the start? A bunch of cardboard boxes and paper. The MRI pictures on the wall? Just a bunch of printouts taped up. Doors are covered in paper for unknown reasons. Signs that are obviously just taped to the wall indicate business names. This was obviously shot in a house and in some warehouse somewhere but there are ways make this not quite so obvious.
It's not even enjoyable as a bad movie because it's just so inept without the putrid charm that "The Room" or "Birdemic: Shock and Horror" has.
Give this one a pass. You'll thank me later.
Did you know
- TriviaThe film was only released in four cities. After its theatrical run, the film's distributor called each theatre individually and told them to burn the prints because it was cheaper than sending them back.
- GoofsWhen Matthew gives Sarah the microchips, a suitcase is on the table. The next shot the suitcase has disappeared.
- Quotes
Matthew Andrews: So, picture a flat surface. Out of the surface, one letter rises.
Sarah Austin: From the alphabet?
Matthew Andrews: Yes.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Atop the Fourth Wall: Plan 9 from Outer Space: 30 Years Later #1 (2013)
- How long is After Last Season?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- The MRI Room
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $5,000,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 33 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content