After Last Season

This is the movie that high school students watch to see all the dreadfully horrendous things that could happen in their drama videos. Extremely bad lighting which casts deep shadows everywhere, there is no concept of back lighting. The audio is poor with the sound being echoed and blurred making it very difficult to hear the actors. White paper is constantly used in props to make extremely unrealistic MRI Scanners, computers, half formed bedrooms and offices. Real bedrooms with fancy ceiling lights are used as clinic rooms. Industrial basements used in the film are half covered showing drain pipes, dirty brick walls and filthy floors with office furniture consisting of 2 deck chairs. The acting is so static you would think that they were talking statues. I expected the actors to move rather than be glued in place. The editing of this film is so bad that every edit makes you believe you are in a different scene. The editing makes you feel that you are randomly jumping about in time in 5 second intervals. In conclusion this film is absolute garbage and the rating has definitely been rigged.

Just... HORRIBLE! Why was this made? Where did the 5,000,000 dollar budget go? Why did the creator make thousands of fake IMDb accounts and give it 10 stars? He should be punished. Punished for falsely voting, and punished for making such a shitty movie. I do not know how to describe this movie. I went to a random word generator for that. (No joke) This film was horrible. The sound design, the sets, the music, the camera-work. It's all just horrible! How was this shot on 35 millimeter film? It looks horrible. It is a disgrace to films! Why was it made is the last question I have, and it is also my last argument. This film was literally burned by cinemas, because it was cheaper than sending it back to the creators. The only known evidence is the DVDs of this monstrosity. Destroy the DVDs if you have them. Please. For me and for the world.

This thing makes The Room look like Kenneth Branagh's Henry V by comparison. It looks like it was made by a blind director working with a blind cinematographer and a blind lighting man filming people who never read a script and are just improvising their parts without being told what the other people are doing in the film, scored by a deaf composer. Set design by a crew of kindergartners using the construction paper, tape, glue, and markers left over from recess.

I have no idea how they knew enough about film making to turn the camera on, but that appears to have been the extent of their knowledge.

In this review I am not going to talk about the film at all really but rather the pathetic attempts by the team to cover up this frankly sh1t film.

Now before anyone complains, let it be known that I love film as an art-form and even when I think the film is 'bad', if the team has at least worked hard and clearly tried their hardest I can normally respect them. However, writing fake reviews to trick people into watching is NOT ACCEPTABLE! I'm not going to pretend I can see inside the directors head but all I know is that something is wrong with these scores...

Votes Percentage Rating 5833 89.1% 10 45 0.7% 9 22 0.3% 8 18 0.3% 7 12 0.2% 6 8 0.1% 5 7 0.1% 4 10 0.2% 3 53 0.8% 2 537 8.2% 1

WOW!Over 89% on 10 / 10, must be a masterpiece right, seriously guys just watch the trailer and see if you can spot a problem in this. The other problem that should be immediately clear is how the next highest percentage is 8.2 at 1... pretty big split no, I don't think I've ever seen one that large in fact like EVER!

I'm sick of even thinking about this sh1t right now. I know you might be thinking "but Max what sucked about the film" so i'll answer...

Everying!!! Nuff said. If you want to know the specific problems please read someone else's review, except filter by worst first as then you wont get Mr. Reigon and his crew attempting to glorify this crock of sh1t

One final bit of trivia for you, did you know that the budget of this film was $5,000,000 and that only $30,000 of it was actually spent on the film, with the other $4,970,000 all going into CGI. Huh interesting but one thing Mr. Reigon...

3D modeling software does not attribute to $4,970,000! 'Blender' alone is free and while I'm sure the software you use is better than that, it may interest you to know that the software Disney uses is but a fraction of that (e.g. Autodesk Maya = little over $1,400 for industry level animation).

Please play this clip of $4,000,000+ animation www.you tube.com/watch?v=UqIewqGUdOM After last season funniest scene {sorry for bad quality, best I could find quickly}

I'm sorry Mr. Reigon could you attempt to I don't know, try, in the future. To everyone else, stop watching this film it is probably an embezzlement scam and you are giving this... 'individual' money.

This "movie" is the worst thing ever. And the only reason I put the word movie in quotation marks is because I barely consider it a movie. I honestly think it's just a slideshow of random clips with "characters" on a cheap set.

I've only seen the movie once and I don't remember anything, which shows how boring and unoriginal this must really be. It's also known that the creator of this movie created a LOT of IMDb accounts to write good reviews and give it 10 stars, just look at the ratings! 88% of people gave it a perfect 10/10. Every time someone gives it a 1 - 2 star rating, the creator makes another 25 accounts to give it a 10 star rating.