Take Back

In seeing Mickey Rourke here in this movie, I realized that he could very easily star in a reenactment of the "Elephant Man." The production would be a lot less expensive due to the fact that Mickey would not need any special make up effects.

Terrible acting for a start, unnecessary graphic shots of women obviously directed by a pervert, all the characters have no substance. Every scene with Mickey Rourke I found myself looking at his dreadful face surgery and not even paying attention to what was going on as it is that distracting. He plays a sex trafficking head honcho yet he can't afford a flat screen tv ???? The main character is displayed as a level headed woman yet she has a samurai sword on display in her house on a stand ??? It's a stupid film with stupid characters. A 15 rating just shows that the censors are not doing their job.

It's like nobody even cared about this movie. They have top named actors playing second fiddle to nobodies who can't act to save their lives and they were so lazy on the cover of the movie they litterally just cut the image of MJW's movie Falcon Rising and copy pasted it to this one.

I like Michael J. & his material arts loaded movies - this one is not! It's littered with scenes that add no value to the overall storyline! It's actually sad that experienced film makers can do this- maybe covid affected them!

You have a lead who seemingly has amnesia,then is suddenly faking it, clueless cops, an impotent Michael J. Who's decisions & thought process don't make sense.

The story is just so everywhere, it's like they're showing a movie as the backstory at the same time while suffering from memory loss!

I hated that I wasted time watching this, even if I was high-it wouldn't have made sense or be exciting.

I don't want to dismiss or put anyone's effort down, but honestly, they could and should have done better!!

I cant believe how bad this movie is. I could only watch 15 minutes before I had to turn it off. Why Mickey?