Take Back

Terrible acting for a start, unnecessary graphic shots of women obviously directed by a pervert, all the characters have no substance. Every scene with Mickey Rourke I found myself looking at his dreadful face surgery and not even paying attention to what was going on as it is that distracting. He plays a sex trafficking head honcho yet he can't afford a flat screen tv ???? The main character is displayed as a level headed woman yet she has a samurai sword on display in her house on a stand ??? It's a stupid film with stupid characters. A 15 rating just shows that the censors are not doing their job.

It's like nobody even cared about this movie. They have top named actors playing second fiddle to nobodies who can't act to save their lives and they were so lazy on the cover of the movie they litterally just cut the image of MJW's movie Falcon Rising and copy pasted it to this one.

No pun intended - there is no way back! There is no time given back especially. Now I have seen worse movies (Daniel der Zauberer to name the most recent one), but having said that, I really didn't need to watch this one too. On the other hand I am a fan of Michel Jai White ... and even if I wouldn't say it is his best movie (I reckon you can consider this a pun), it is always nice to see him act in something ... well you know what I mean.

Not sure if it qualifies to be called a B-movie action film - but you do have to have a heart for low budget movies. And if you also like one or more of the actors ... well it certainly will help with enjoying this. Decent enough if you suspend your disbelief I reckon ...

I cant believe how bad this movie is. I could only watch 15 minutes before I had to turn it off. Why Mickey?

In seeing Mickey Rourke here in this movie, I realized that he could very easily star in a reenactment of the "Elephant Man." The production would be a lot less expensive due to the fact that Mickey would not need any special make up effects.