Hauntology

At the end of the film Hauntology, I found myself grappling with mixed feelings. On one hand, the premise of the film intrigued me, but on the other, I was left feeling that it could have been a far more engaging experience. As the credits rolled, I couldn't help but reflect on the numerous moments throughout the film that made me cringe, primarily due to the subpar acting and effects. These elements, while perhaps intended to create a unique atmosphere, often detracted from the overall narrative and emotional impact of the story.

The film seems to cater to a very niche audience, one that appreciates the deeper, perhaps more esoteric themes of hauntology itself. This concept, which deals with the presence of ghosts from the past within the current reality, offers fertile ground for storytelling. However, as someone who doesn't necessarily resonate with this specific audience, I felt somewhat alienated. Despite its intellectual ambitions, Hauntology struggled to communicate its ideas effectively, leaving me and perhaps other viewers outside its intended demographic feeling somewhat disconnected.

One of the most notable shortcomings was the acting. The performances came across as wooden and unconvincing at times, which made it challenging to become emotionally invested in the characters. For a film that seeks to explore themes of memory, loss, and the haunting presence of the past, it is vital for the actors to evoke genuine emotions. Unfortunately, the lack of depth in their portrayals made it difficult to connect with their struggles. Instead of feeling empathy or tension, I found myself distracted by the performances, which undermined the film's potential to resonate on a deeper level.

Additionally, the special effects left much to be desired. In a genre where visual storytelling can significantly enhance the atmosphere and narrative, the substandard effects often pulled me out of the moment. Rather than instilling a sense of dread or intrigue, they felt clunky and unrefined. This was particularly evident in the film's attempt to convey its ghostly themes, as the effects did not succeed in creating a haunting or eerie ambiance. Instead of being captivated by the visuals, I was left feeling more amused than scared, which is not the reaction a horror film typically aims to elicit.

I saw this film at its premiere at Dances with Films waaaay back in June (I'm just now joining this site.) I truly enjoyed it. If you didn't get it by the name, this film is a horror anthology. A lot of indie films go this route. I believe because it elevates a lot of the problems with production schedules. You can make a film piece by piece or have multiple directors come on and each tackle a section. This film appears to only have one director though throughout its smaller stories. This led to a lot of fun with the themes it tackles. If you're a member of the LGBT community, you'll find a lot to love here. And, that's a huge crossover in horror fandom. Like most horror, I feel like its best to go in blind to these, but I will say, the one about the art gallery was my favorite. When I think of this movie, that's the one that sticks with me. That and the ending wrap around that ties the whole experience together nicely.

No pun intended - the movie consists of multiple stories being told ... to make someone think about their plan to leave ... I'll tell you stories ... and when I am done maybe you want to stay. I personally don't see it ... but then again, maybe one character loves telling stories and the other one likes listening to them.

This deals with a lot of issues ... like LGBTQ+ stuff and so much more. So obviously you cannot be too sensitive with stuff like that. You also should be aware that this has some script issues ... and acting issues ... sometimes it is cringe ... like a lot. You may feel ashamed or embarrassed ... I reckon you will be able to tell if this is for you or not .. very early on. I might have rated it higher than others ... but also lower than some who liked the themes and didn't mind the flaws ...

Wow, wasn't expecting to watch a homegrown horror on the same day as the mega Megalopolis, so this review was supposed to be much shorter in my mind, but the similarities between the two really stood out to me, and I ended up kinda writing a two in one blended review for both haha

"Don't Dream It, Be It" - HAUNTOLOGY (2024), dir. Parker Brennon 🎩👻🌈🎩👻🌈🎩👻🌈🎩👻🌈🎩👻🎩

By happenstance, I was paid to watch a screener at home for this crowdfunded, small scale indie I had not heard of on the same day as spending money to witness Francis Ford Coppola's self financed epic, Megalopolis, up on the big screen after over a year of eager anticipation for its release being involved in the production myself. What I didn't anticipate going in though, was how I left the theater surprisingly struck by the similarities seen within the unintended double bill, despite the glaringly apparent distinctions between the two films.

READ REVIEW ON LETTERBOXD: (RollTide1931)

#hauntology #parkerbrennon #Megalopolis #francisfordcoppola.

When I stumbled upon the 2024 movie "Hauntology" by random chance here in 2025, I figured it was a horror anthology, given the title of the movie. Normally I am not keen on horror anthologies, as they tend to be a questionable affair in general. But given my life-long love and fascination with the horror genre, of course I had to check out what writer and director Parker Brennon had to offer.

And yes, "Hauntology" is indeed a horror anthology.

Well, as a horror anthology, let's break down the individual segments.

The first segment is titled "Witchcraft Becomes Her" was an adequate tale in the sense that it had an interesting story, but it was hardly a scary story. In fact, this was actually the best of all the boring segments that made up "Hauntology".

Segment number two is titled "The Day Mabel Came out of the Grave". A nice and interesting title, if nothing else. But again, there was nothing scary about this tale either.

Moving on to the third segment, which is titled "Paint & Black Lace". I never understood the strangulation by a plastic bag thing, as you just simply use two fingers to tear a hole at your mouth, voila, and you can breathe. And once again, another segment that proved not to be scary.

And the fourth segment is titled "The Old Dark Cashel House", oh and guess what, not scary either.

The narrative that tied the four different segments was actually better than most of the segments.

The only performers on the cast list that I was familiar with was Naomi Grossman and Nancy Kyes. The acting performances throughout the segments were fair, despite of them having very meager material to work with.

"Hauntology" was a brutally dull anthology. Notice how I left out the 'horror' part there? Yeah, there was nothing horror about this dumpster fire of a movie.

My rating of writer and director Parker Brennon dumpster fire of a "horror" anthology lands on a generous two out of ten stars, not because there is any entertainment to be had in the segments, but because of the production value of the ordeal and the acting performances.