1934. Miranda Green and five other strangers, are invited to the remote island mansion of billionaire Lewis Findley. As the weekend progresses the clues about why they have been invited begi... Read all1934. Miranda Green and five other strangers, are invited to the remote island mansion of billionaire Lewis Findley. As the weekend progresses the clues about why they have been invited begin to unfold along with a sinister mystery.1934. Miranda Green and five other strangers, are invited to the remote island mansion of billionaire Lewis Findley. As the weekend progresses the clues about why they have been invited begin to unfold along with a sinister mystery.
Bianca A. Santos
- Carmen Blanco
- (as Bianca Santos)
Pete Berwick
- Patron
- (uncredited)
Featured reviews
So the acting in this flick is absolutely terrible but it certainly did not get any help from the writing. I am a life long fan of Agatha Christie and other mystery authors, as well as some film noir and I'm a little crazy about giallos. I also love a good mystery-comedy like the 1985 classic, Clue: The Movie with Tim Curry and Madeline Kahn. I would go as far as to say that Clue is one of my top five favorite films of all time. I thought more recent films like Knives Out and See How They Run were both fun and entertaining, while not being up to my highest standards. BUT THIS....did a teenager write this screenplay as fan fiction or what?
Casting a middle aged woman as the obnoxious but lovable, brilliant Hercule Poirot in a skirt could have worked. Could have. An older, curvier Mischa Barton can't plod through movies on her youthful glamorous looks anymore - she's borderline unrecognizable as an average, curvy blonde of about 40 - but that's not the problem: she can't act.
At bottom it is the writing that is terrible, though, that much is clear by the multiple caricatures which should be delightful and funny but just end up coming across as wooden and ridiculous.
There is a enormous dark house with chandeliers, and I do love a nice pair of vintage curtains.
Casting a middle aged woman as the obnoxious but lovable, brilliant Hercule Poirot in a skirt could have worked. Could have. An older, curvier Mischa Barton can't plod through movies on her youthful glamorous looks anymore - she's borderline unrecognizable as an average, curvy blonde of about 40 - but that's not the problem: she can't act.
At bottom it is the writing that is terrible, though, that much is clear by the multiple caricatures which should be delightful and funny but just end up coming across as wooden and ridiculous.
There is a enormous dark house with chandeliers, and I do love a nice pair of vintage curtains.
A bit slow and plodding with some questionable acting and some atrocious attempts at acents. The script writing is somewhat lacking and the there's not much of a plot. By the time the titles roll at the ninety minute mark it feels like it's been half an hour too long. The characters are all a bit wooden and the actors seemed to be simply going through the motions. None of them seemed to engage with their character and I couldn't engage with them either.
Has a made for TV feel to it and I would strongly suggest it's not worth going to the cinema to see.
It's not terrible but it's not good either. If you're really bored then maybe give it a whirl.
Has a made for TV feel to it and I would strongly suggest it's not worth going to the cinema to see.
It's not terrible but it's not good either. If you're really bored then maybe give it a whirl.
At first this movie had all the hallmarks of a decent little detective mystery movie in the style of Knives Out or Mourder on the Orient express. It has a decent set up, a coherent plot, it establishes its characters and starts to build on their motives.
Unfortunately, it then suffers from having a beginning, no middle and then ends. Why? Probably due to budget or talent or deadline. Who knows. But right until it had me hooked about an hour in, it started to move toward a conclusion and finished.
It's a shame. Micha Barton was a surprise and the set up was good, so, half a film. Still, better than no film at all.
Unfortunately, it then suffers from having a beginning, no middle and then ends. Why? Probably due to budget or talent or deadline. Who knows. But right until it had me hooked about an hour in, it started to move toward a conclusion and finished.
It's a shame. Micha Barton was a surprise and the set up was good, so, half a film. Still, better than no film at all.
Seems to be a remake of agatha christie's novel "and then there were none". They even mention christie by name in the first minute! Micha barton is miranda green. She notices little details. So when guests at an estate start dying, she's determined to figure it out before the police arrive. Alex hyde white (plays sean, the butler) is the son of wilfrid hyde white, who was in the 1965 version of ten little indians! And in some other pretty big films too. My fair lady, third man. It's mostly good. Never gets too suspenseful, but there are some twists and turns. The guests' stories near the end really slow down the story. They seem to drag on and on. And one demerit for some silly little mistakes that a solid christie fan probably would not make. Directed by stephen shimek.
This movie was Agatha Christie on a budget but I still found it engaging. Fun to see Mischa Barton (The OC) again and she did an engaging job with her central character.
The plot was straightforward enough though certainly not original, it seemed to take from several other Agatha Christie stories and mash them together.
It seems like they are setting this up for a series starring Mischa Barton as the new female detective heroine and I would watch another one of these for sure. I'm a sucker for British murder mysteries and this was as good as many so why not?
Still 40 characters short, the review length criteria is too long on IMDB.
The plot was straightforward enough though certainly not original, it seemed to take from several other Agatha Christie stories and mash them together.
It seems like they are setting this up for a series starring Mischa Barton as the new female detective heroine and I would watch another one of these for sure. I'm a sucker for British murder mysteries and this was as good as many so why not?
Still 40 characters short, the review length criteria is too long on IMDB.
Did you know
- TriviaEarly in the movie, when Miranda is in the book store, she opens the book to a chapter titled "Locard's Exchange Principle," named for Edmond Locard, a French criminologist commonly regarded as the "father" of forensic science in the early 1900s. The principle says that "every contact leaves a trace." Thus, whenever two objects come into contact, there is always an exchange of material between them; e.g., if a person is hit on the head with a tree branch, some trace of the branch will be left on the head and some trace of the head will be found on the branch.
- GoofsMiranda reads in a book that Findley is worth billions. In the time in which this movie is set, in Britain, a billion is not a thousand million but a million million. As such, there was nobody worth billions in the world, and a British book would not have made that claim about anybody.
- ConnectionsFollowed by Murder at the Embassy (2025)
- How long is Invitation to a Murder?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Invitación a un asesinato
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $12,860
- Runtime
- 1h 32m(92 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content




