Two friends forced to spend the night in a ghost town find themselves hunted by a prehistoric predator.Two friends forced to spend the night in a ghost town find themselves hunted by a prehistoric predator.Two friends forced to spend the night in a ghost town find themselves hunted by a prehistoric predator.
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I expected another cruddy creature feature and was pleasantly surprised with this movie. The acting was very good. The CG was pretty good and all in all it was a fun watch.
There was a couple of minutes right before the end that I thought was not funny at all. Thankfully it did not end on that.
Apart from that one bit, very, very watchable.
Good fun.
There was a couple of minutes right before the end that I thought was not funny at all. Thankfully it did not end on that.
Apart from that one bit, very, very watchable.
Good fun.
I give it 4 stars for the good CGI and the good acting of the girl. The acting of all the other characters was really bad. The plot is non-existent. I mean, the preview tells you literally what it is about: two people get chased around by a raptor for an hour and half. No backstory, no drama, no complexity, and the attempts at humor were pretty bad. Sorry to the people who made it, as I know you put your heart into it, but I just did not find it to be a good movie (the girl's good acting aside).
Claw was a decent movie, the rating is below-average, but I don't nessaserily agree, I think with its approach it works quite well, and doesn't do much wrong. The quipps are hit-and-miss, but it doesn't jump and then swim, it takes it's hit and when doesn't work which some don't, then your left with an empty ocean. If they do work, then they swim like Fishes. So let's get into the review.
Both friends are stuck in a deserted and colourless area in a sand heap, unfortunately for them with a Broken car, and nobody in sight, are quirky characters are stuck with a decision. The first 10 minutes is good because it has charm, it has their quirky side, and the dynamic is interesting because they are both completely different. What makes this part good is when the girls dancing and flexing trying to get a ride, the scene is played out well because it's charming and fun. If you explore some negatives then yes you'd think they'd have a spare tyre, but apart from that it seems quite good so far-7
Then the next part has some pacing issues, but the exploration on the farm was interesting and did develop some fears and did have some genuine scares which is what I liked. There's also some surprises along the way, and I am surprised the man getting nudged couldn't wake up, that was a funny scene because you didn't know what he was like, so far a few flaws but mostly good, so stay with me-6.5
Then we get the action scenes, which some are full of surprises, and the Movie completely laughs in your face! And gives you some fun and energetic runs, the girly screams from the man will never not be funny. And if any nit-pics, I wish the guy would have more of an interesting mystery, as it comes across as abit formulaic with him acting mysterious the whole time, and he told a little white lie, it did disappoint slightly but not too bad. 5.5 so far.
Then a year later, the Friends then joke around about how they were in a desolute town and that they had a mysterious old man, I quite liked some of the jokes, like I said not all of them sticked but worth the watch. A fun fulfilled time with a brilliant ending. 5.60 Avg Weighted for me.
I think this film is a 5 Because it has some good action-Sequences and was a good fun time that's laughably dumb. Not bad indeed, I'd say a solid 5/10 worth a one-time-watch, just "One more time, we're gonna celebrate".
Both friends are stuck in a deserted and colourless area in a sand heap, unfortunately for them with a Broken car, and nobody in sight, are quirky characters are stuck with a decision. The first 10 minutes is good because it has charm, it has their quirky side, and the dynamic is interesting because they are both completely different. What makes this part good is when the girls dancing and flexing trying to get a ride, the scene is played out well because it's charming and fun. If you explore some negatives then yes you'd think they'd have a spare tyre, but apart from that it seems quite good so far-7
Then the next part has some pacing issues, but the exploration on the farm was interesting and did develop some fears and did have some genuine scares which is what I liked. There's also some surprises along the way, and I am surprised the man getting nudged couldn't wake up, that was a funny scene because you didn't know what he was like, so far a few flaws but mostly good, so stay with me-6.5
Then we get the action scenes, which some are full of surprises, and the Movie completely laughs in your face! And gives you some fun and energetic runs, the girly screams from the man will never not be funny. And if any nit-pics, I wish the guy would have more of an interesting mystery, as it comes across as abit formulaic with him acting mysterious the whole time, and he told a little white lie, it did disappoint slightly but not too bad. 5.5 so far.
Then a year later, the Friends then joke around about how they were in a desolute town and that they had a mysterious old man, I quite liked some of the jokes, like I said not all of them sticked but worth the watch. A fun fulfilled time with a brilliant ending. 5.60 Avg Weighted for me.
I think this film is a 5 Because it has some good action-Sequences and was a good fun time that's laughably dumb. Not bad indeed, I'd say a solid 5/10 worth a one-time-watch, just "One more time, we're gonna celebrate".
A note about my rating system: because I rate on a highly subjective, relativistic scale, virtually any movie can achieve a 10/10 rating with me. After all, nothing prevents even the very cheapest of movies from telling a great story. A limited budget and amateur actors needn't cripple a movie in the hands of enthusiastic and devoted makers. And so on.
Just as uninspired workmanship can flush a giant budget down the toilet, so can talent and enthusiasm carry the day for the poverty-stricken. You'd be surprised how your old aunt Mabel and best pal Cooter can reach for the stars on their Walmart lunch break last Tuesday. A 10/10 is within the grasp of any movie that cares enough to rise above itself and reach for it.
And, sadly, it's precisely because of this truth that CLAW was so disappointing. For about 90% of the movie, CLAW was sailing along, high and proud, and was well on its way to getting at least a 9/10 and had the potential of even a top 10/10.
And then CLAW literally self-destructed right at the finish line. The writer/director (mostly the same person) somehow lost control or simply went insane and CLAW transmogrified back into the moldy pumpkin from whence it came. Somehow, watching the movie, which had been doing so well, suddenly sprout warts out of nowhere was more disturbing than if it had simply been garbage all along.
I can't be certain, of course, but the impression that I got was that the writer/director couldn't figure out how to end the movie. And so we got a cheesy ending feint of a dream sequence followed by an even worse dream-echo sequence where a full-grown Tyrannosaurus rex just shows up out of nowhere and peeks in through the window. Rawr.
For most of the movie, CLAW had a sort of original TREMORS buddy/monster movie kind of vibe going for it. Structurally, it was almost identical to TREMORS where we have an unjustifiably-present monster effectively just thrown on stage (a premise you're just supposed to accept out of goodwill, apparently) and then the bulk of the movie is our unlikely duo attempting to come to terms and survive in a remote location, with no hope of help, while creatively fending off this monster that wants to eat them.
In CLAW, the two leads did a surprisingly high quality acting job and were very engaging/believable. The simple setting, premise and chase-scene sensibilities in combination with engaging and believable leads was working an excellent chemistry, and then, without warning, the whole thing just took a turn for the stupid.
What a shame.
Just as uninspired workmanship can flush a giant budget down the toilet, so can talent and enthusiasm carry the day for the poverty-stricken. You'd be surprised how your old aunt Mabel and best pal Cooter can reach for the stars on their Walmart lunch break last Tuesday. A 10/10 is within the grasp of any movie that cares enough to rise above itself and reach for it.
And, sadly, it's precisely because of this truth that CLAW was so disappointing. For about 90% of the movie, CLAW was sailing along, high and proud, and was well on its way to getting at least a 9/10 and had the potential of even a top 10/10.
And then CLAW literally self-destructed right at the finish line. The writer/director (mostly the same person) somehow lost control or simply went insane and CLAW transmogrified back into the moldy pumpkin from whence it came. Somehow, watching the movie, which had been doing so well, suddenly sprout warts out of nowhere was more disturbing than if it had simply been garbage all along.
I can't be certain, of course, but the impression that I got was that the writer/director couldn't figure out how to end the movie. And so we got a cheesy ending feint of a dream sequence followed by an even worse dream-echo sequence where a full-grown Tyrannosaurus rex just shows up out of nowhere and peeks in through the window. Rawr.
For most of the movie, CLAW had a sort of original TREMORS buddy/monster movie kind of vibe going for it. Structurally, it was almost identical to TREMORS where we have an unjustifiably-present monster effectively just thrown on stage (a premise you're just supposed to accept out of goodwill, apparently) and then the bulk of the movie is our unlikely duo attempting to come to terms and survive in a remote location, with no hope of help, while creatively fending off this monster that wants to eat them.
In CLAW, the two leads did a surprisingly high quality acting job and were very engaging/believable. The simple setting, premise and chase-scene sensibilities in combination with engaging and believable leads was working an excellent chemistry, and then, without warning, the whole thing just took a turn for the stupid.
What a shame.
This is a nice little comedy. It ain't King Lear. It ain't Gone With The Wind. It's a small fun movie, designed to make you smile and laugh and get some cheap flash scares on the way. The acting is just fine, in fact very good for this movie genre.
When you have some time and need to decompress, start this one and see how you like it.
When you have some time and need to decompress, start this one and see how you like it.
Did you know
- TriviaCRAZY CREDITS: The story, including all names, characters and incidents portrayed in this production are fictitious. No identification with actual persons, places, buildings, dinosaurs and/or products is intended o should be inferred. Watch the rolling end credits for extra scenes.
- GoofsThe camper/caravan they are staying in is right next to the shed where the raptor is, but from when the owner runs from the shed to the camper to when the couple run from the camper, it appears that they are far apart when they are right next door.
- How long is Claw?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Кошмар Юрського періоду
- Filming locations
- Pioneertown, California, USA(ghost town)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 21 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content