The Deep House

The idea of a haunted house underwater... quite original. Unfortunately, most of the rest of the movie was just... not well thought out.

The main characters are poorly done. The male lead is just an unlikeable ass, and the female lead is an idiot. They make insanely stupid choices time and time again, things that nobody would ever do. Even for a horror movie, it's just too much.

Add to that the "evil" is just more of the typical poorly written nonsense. No real defined powers. Goes from the usual "moving things" to "I can warp reality" back to "let's flicker the lights". They really need to learn to establish exactly what abilities hauntings have. Because in most of these movies, some of the powers shown means the "ghosts" should just instantly win as soon as anyone steps foot in the house.

The writers also clearly have never actually gone diving before, or used most of the technology shown in the movie. Things don't work the way they wrote them working.

All in all, the movie is okay for a one time mindless watch. A few okay jump scares, a unique concept... but overall... just kind of meh. Really falls apart at the end too. Disappointing. Not the worst movie out there, but there's far better horror picks.

Well, this movie was certainly unique.

When I sat down to watch the 2021 horror mystery "The Deep House" from writers Alexandre Bustillo and Julien Maury I hadn't even heard about the movie. I had just briefly skimmed through the synopsis and figured from the cover that it could potentially be a movie worthwhile watching. So of course I opted to watch "The Deep House".

I have to admit flat out that I really enjoyed the concept of "The Deep House". The whole thing with a submerged and genuinely creepy house being explored with limited light sources and limited air supply was something that had an interesting appeal to it. And there were definitely some great moments to be experienced throughout the course of the movie. While this out of the ordinary approach to a horror movie was interesting, the actual storyline itself was sort of mundane, if you objectively take a step back and look at it.

And while "The Deep House" was watchable, this was hardly a horror mystery that warrants more than just a single viewing. Yeah, the movie's storyline just didn't have enough aspects and layers, nor contents to support more than just that one and only viewing. So that was something that weighed against the movie.

The acting performances in "The Deep House" were somewhat inadequate, because the two main performers were essentially wearing diving masks for about 95% of the movie, so you lost a lot of facial expressions and mimicry in the dialogue. And being submerged and swimming around certainly also had some limitations upon bodily movement and body language. Again, a shame, because it worked against the overall feel of the movie.

For a horror movie then "The Deep House" just didn't really cut it. Aside from the underwater theme, then "The Deep House" didn't bring anything new or overly thrilling to the horror genre.

Once you get past the submerged creepy house factor of the movie, then you are left with a rather mediocre and mundane horror experience. And once you take out that watery doom factor, you just have a haunted storyline that is similar to many other horror movies.

The camera work in "The Deep House" should also be addressed, as it had that shoddy and wobbly found footage crap style of camera operation to it. I don't enjoy that, since it feels amateurish and low budget. When I sit down to watch a movie, I want to watch proper cinematography, and not something I could do myself with my DV camera.

My rating of "The Deep House" lands on a bland five out of ten stars. I would have rated it a six, but given the fact that so much was lost in terms of acting and mimicry because of the masks and the restrictions of being underwater for almost the entire movie, then I have to let the final rating sink to the bottom as a bland five stars.

This one takes place underwater 😂. After watching the trailer I thought it was going to be terrible. I liked the concept so I decided to give it a shot. Surprisingly it turned out to be a fairly decent film. Nothing special about it other then it taking place underwater. However! It flowed well and most importantly it kept my attention. I would definitely like to watch the making of this movie.

I like the idea - the problem was the people who made this - the two lead "actors" also "wrote" it. The dialog is absolutely awful.

When he says to her "you've got 60 minutes of air and you can hold your breath for 3 minutes," something that no one has ever said to anyone for no reason ever, I knew we were in trouble. Why would you tell someone out of the blue "and you can hold your breath for 3 minutes, you know, in case we meet ghosts down there or something..."

The two leads cannot act. They're reciting terribly written dialog. And when anything happens, the camera just flings all over the place so you get flashing lights, stuff in front of you that you can't tell what it is, and the 'actors" in shock.

Also, you get the standard ten "this is great" two line reviews in IMDB from "people" with no other reviews who...you guessed it...worked on this.

I do like the concept. It should be made by competent film makers so it isn't a chore to get through. Maybe someone else will give it a shot at some point.

OK. As most reviewers have indicated, the concept is somewhat unique but the overall story is lacking character depth and better explanation.

The film quality was not bad but the dialogue didn't add much direction or give the viewer reasons to invest in the characters. There were a few creepy moments but nothing to rave about and there was, in my opinion, a lack luster ending.

Simply put, it wasn't awful but it has a long way to go before it can be compared to this directorial duo's brilliance displayed in their prior film "Inside".