Lilo et Stitch

Disney strikes again with yet another pointless live-action remake with LILO&STITCH. The original came out back in 2002. That movie had edge, great music, a unique animation style, and an emotional story with great themes family and belonging. The remake has... some of those. The story is mostly the same. Lilo (Maia Kealoha) is a young rambunctious kid who is coping with the loss of her parents alongside her teenage sister Nani (Sydney Elizebeth Agudong), who's trying her best to keep guardianship of Lilo. With the threat of social worker Mrs. Kekoa (Tia Carrere) potentially taking Lilo away, the weight of the world is on her shoulders. Meanwhile, an alien creature who was designed to be an agent of chaos and destruction, escapes and crash-lands nearby. Lilo, desperate for a friend, adopts him and gives him the name Stitch (Chris Sanders). I really enjoyed this movie, until I rewatched the original. They mimic most of the best parts, but it's what they changed that annoys me. With the characters, they completely cut one, which change another one, then they added 2 that took away from some of the other character moments that I needed from the original. The added ones should've been cameos that aren't involved in the plot. If you see both movies, you'll know what I'm talking about. This movie feels even safer than the original. Lilo is less of a menace to society. Nani is less connected with her sister, which weakens the core of the whole story. It's so difficult to not compare, but if you haven't seen the original, you'll probably really enjoy this. The theme is still present, but not as vibrant or emotional, especially with how it ends. Ohana means family. Family means nobody gets left behind, or forgotten. This theme may have been left behind just a little bit. This might be one of the best Disney live-action remakes, but the bar is so incredibly low. This might be a harsh take, but I'm just tired of my childhood being ruined. If you have kids, I still recommend LILO&STITCH, but stick with the animated version. Let's send a message to Disney. Remember, no matter how good these remakes are, they'll never be as good as the original animated classics. It still makes me wonder why Disney is still doing them, besides being a cash-grab. Why don't they just re-release the originals back into theaters?

What to say about this remake? The kids will love it. Stitch is spot-on animated, the cast is great, especially for Lilo and her sister Nani. And that's about it about the good stuff.

For hardcore fans of the original as myself this remake will be a disappointment.

The story at the beginning is rushed, iconic characters are missing, there are some new characters that add absolutely nothing to the story, iconic story elements are missing, the main villain is changed, the reference to Elvis Presley is barely in it, the reference to "ohana" is completely changed thus changing the messaging of the movie (because you know, we live in "modern" times now), the third act is a mess and I literally hated the ending.

But it is still watchable and the kids will enjoy it.

If you are expecting a carbon copy of the animated version, you will be disappointed. The story has been changed, characters removed, not many laughs and too much focus on the human characters.

Stitch had some cute moments but they were few and far between.

The key introduction to a new neighbour was an added touch but I do feel that this was needed as the film did drag on. At 1 hour 45 mins, this could easily have been reduced to a 90 min movie.

This could have been so much better and this had high potential but sadly fails.

Was an okay watch for a rainy day but wouldn't rush to watch again.

I really wanted to enjoy this, especially given the nostalgia tied to the original, but it just didn't land for me. The pacing felt rushed-like the filmmakers were in a hurry to get through the plot rather than let it breathe. They introduced new characters that didn't add much and honestly felt unnecessary.

What bothered me most was how far the story veered from the original. It didn't feel like a natural evolution or a modern reimagining-it felt like they were actively trying to make it not the classic we grew up loving. On top of that, the casting didn't help. The characters didn't match the personalities or essence they were supposed to represent, which made it hard to stay immersed.

Overall, it missed the mark for me. Sometimes sticking closer to the source material really is the better call.

Lilo & Stitch suffers from all the usual problems that make these Disney live action remakes so much worse than the animated originals they attempt to adapt. The film is noticeably longer for no reason thanks to its unnecessary need to add new characters who bring nothing and almost all of its changes do more damage than good. However, it mostly retains the heart of its predecessor and still contains some good laughs so it can comfortably avoid being the worst remake.

Maia Kealoha is a suitably adorable Lilo and Chris Sanders is obviously a great Stitch, who remains the best part. Sydney Agudong is a good Nani but pretty much everyone else is so bland and Courtney B. Vance's Cobra Bubbles is especially screwed over by the changes to his character. Zach Galifianakis & Billy Magnussen as Jumba & Pleakley are a colossal step down in comparison to the original duo and their alien forms are now extremely uncanny.

Dean Fleischer Camp's direction gets the job done in the standard issue authorless fashion. All the technical issues stem from the near total lack of energy which comes from the misguided idea to (kinda) faithfully adapt a film that wasn't even remotely made with live action sensibilities in mind. The uniqueness has gone and it's replaced by something that generally feels a lot more generic. At least the CGI for Stitch is good enough because it would've been unwatchable if it wasn't.