Everything in the End

The whole vibe of this movie is perfect. One of my favorite depictions of the end of days on earth. Doesn't focus on catastrophe, but on quiet and peace. If this film took place anywhere else we might see more panic, joy, or chaos, but here in Iceland, the end of the world comes in a long, peaceful wave of emotional rhythms as different characters weave in and out of the film. It is beautiful and withheld in the best ways. It is probably the best corner of the world to be in when everything ends, and the filmmaking takes on the character of the environment, using the poetry of the landscape to tell the story.

What I especially love is that the script emphasizes the human connection above all else. If there's anything that can last in the end, that's it.

See it.

I went to see 'Everything in the End' at IndieCork last month knowing very little about the film or the director Mylissa Fitzsimmons. I was intrigued by the synopsis and image in the programme enough to go to the film and had the feeling that it was either going to be really good or really bad. As a film that was about earth's final days I was just praying that zombies wouldn't be making an appearance. And my god, was I pleasantly surprised.

The film is beautiful, meditatively paced, and wonderfully simple. The story follows a troubled young man, Paulo, as he navigates Iceland's tormented and unforgiving landscape that rhymes with the grief and existential dread the character is experiencing. Paulo is a sensitive, gentle soul, played by Hugo De Sousa with a great deal of vulnerability and enough angst to rival Søren Kierkegaard. He finds himself for some seemingly unknown reason on foreign shores in the last days of earth, when an equally obscure natural, or perhaps unnatural, disaster is imminent that will wipe out all of humanity. Everyone knows this, and everyone is trying to make peace with themselves, with the universe, and reach out to others and connect in their final days. This is when the film gets really interesting as it is not so much about the impending apocalypse but the connections Paulo makes with others in his final moments, and these moments are simple, spontaneous, and beautifully human.

The film is made up of so many beautiful, fleetingly joyful, scenes, that play so bittersweetly given the context that surrounds them. The characters voices are sometimes almost lost to the wind and the overwhelming presence of nature stands over the small events of the story. But it is not so much about the words, Fitzsimmons makes this clear, many scenes are without dialogue or, as said, cannot be heard and there are many other languages in the film that are not translated. The film, it seems, is more about the actions of the characters and the humanity that they all share. Paulo's motivations are intriguing, he connects deeply with each character but must keep going, bound by some hidden pilgrimage that leads him to his last end. There is almost something Dantean about it in that regard. It also reminded me somewhat of Von Trier's Melancholia and the idea that when we are grieving or in despair, it feels like the whole world is ending. In this sense I do not think the film is meant to be taken completely literally, it is an inner landscape that Paulo is struggling through and it is a film that is meant to be felt rather than logically understood.

The free and spontaneous cinematography capturing the breathtakingly stark beauty of Iceland also reminded me somewhat of Terrence Malick's later work. Cinematographer Todd Hickey has a poetic attention to detail; a close up of a toppled teacup rocking from side to side, some empty clothes pegs shivering in the cold; whilst also paying attention to the vastness of the surroundings and nature's rising fury as the end approaches. I was actually surprised that the film was made by an American crew as I felt that the study of landscape, the style, and pacing all felt very Icelandic!

This film brought up a hell of a lot for me in a very brief hour and fifteen minutes, and the slow burn, meditative pace allows you to reflect more deeply upon its themes. The thing that I found so clever and moving about the film is that director Mylissa Fitzsimmons breaks down all of the background noise of the modern world and culture. The impending doom makes everything irrelevant, everything except basic human connection and closure. We are all going to die, this is what Fitzsimmons is reminding us of, but not in a morose or depressing way but an empathetic, and strangely uplifting way. It reminds us of what life is really about when it comes to the end; love, interconnectivity, and the simple joys of shared human experience. These values are, after all, everything in the end.

Highly recommended.

I love this film; the cinematography is gorgeous and the performances are understated and wonderful. As the film unfolds, we are invited in to observe and think - it's a meditative, compelling experience that rewards an attentive viewer.

The viewer follows a spectrum of characters all dealing with the concept of imminent death. Some are confident and others terrified. Those processing deep losses seem most ready to reconcile with this next phenomenon. The viewer has the opportunity to identify with one or more characters in their own meditation of loss, whether past or what is to come. The wrap-up is surprising and I'm still processing its plausibility and placement. However taken philosophically, one might expect that everything is reconciled, in some manner, in the end. Highly recommend this picturesque journey through Loss.

I love nature and Iceland, the cinema from this land ; so that was a very good opportunity to watch it. Even it had many nomination a prices. But I don´t found any reason in the argument.

Not solid, very experimental but not worth your time, even it is very fast 1 hour and a cuarter. But you feel like you are watching and endless movie.

I find no point, they speak different lenguajes (not traduced in the subtitles) you don´t understand anything, nothing is explained for you the principle character hasn´t got any personality.

The only thing I could say about that is the beautiful cinematography, but with Iceland as set it is no difficult to shot something bad.

3 stars out of 10.