IMDb RATING
5.1/10
4.9K
YOUR RATING
Diana, a young woman who lost her sight, finds a guide in a Chinese boy named Chin. Together they will track down a dangerous killer through the darkness of Italy.Diana, a young woman who lost her sight, finds a guide in a Chinese boy named Chin. Together they will track down a dangerous killer through the darkness of Italy.Diana, a young woman who lost her sight, finds a guide in a Chinese boy named Chin. Together they will track down a dangerous killer through the darkness of Italy.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Andrea Zhang
- Chin
- (as Xinyu Zhang)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Music - awesome. Photography - decent.
Everything else - lame.
Still better then Argento's Dracula, though.
All in all - for diehard Argento fans only.
Everything else - lame.
Still better then Argento's Dracula, though.
All in all - for diehard Argento fans only.
It's safe to say this is far from argento's best work but certainly not his worst. One or two good kills and some decent cinematography. Plus the soundtrack is a good listen. Overall no classic but worth tracking down.
I've already seen this movie twice in a 3 days time.
The first time i mostly noticed what was NOT there:
But the second view made me appreciate more the film in its own right to "exist".
I recognized in it the same sort of empathy towards the main character that i felt in Phenomena, Opera, Trauma.
Technically thumbs up for the score and cinematography.
Good performance from Asia Argento.
The first time i mostly noticed what was NOT there:
- many choreographed murders
- the surprise/shock of finding out who the killer is
- the close ups of gloved hands and weapons to kill the victims
But the second view made me appreciate more the film in its own right to "exist".
I recognized in it the same sort of empathy towards the main character that i felt in Phenomena, Opera, Trauma.
Technically thumbs up for the score and cinematography.
Good performance from Asia Argento.
Nov 22
So here we have Dario Argentos latest film, with the english title of "Dark Glasses".
I has seen all the average reviews, so was pleasantly surprised to find it pretty decent and definitely above average.
Dario would of been 81/82 years old making this, and he has still got it, and hopefully will continue to make more.
I must confess i knew Asia Argento was in it, but it took me awhile to spot her.
Of course it isnt upto his great giallos of the 70s and 80s, but its worthy in this day and age.
I cant see me watching 40 or 50 times but i will watch it again.
Deserves a much better IMDB score.
7.5 from me.
So here we have Dario Argentos latest film, with the english title of "Dark Glasses".
I has seen all the average reviews, so was pleasantly surprised to find it pretty decent and definitely above average.
Dario would of been 81/82 years old making this, and he has still got it, and hopefully will continue to make more.
I must confess i knew Asia Argento was in it, but it took me awhile to spot her.
Of course it isnt upto his great giallos of the 70s and 80s, but its worthy in this day and age.
I cant see me watching 40 or 50 times but i will watch it again.
Deserves a much better IMDB score.
7.5 from me.
I guess you could call Dark Glasses a return to form for Dario Argento in the sense that it's better than Dracula 3D. It more or less feels like an actual film, and while it's a bit too simple and not particularly exciting, outside a couple of brief moments here and there, it's arguably competent enough to be sort of watchable. It's certainly not a return to form in the sense that it rivals the filmmaker's best stuff, even if the premise here is something that's easy to imagine Argento tackling in the 1970s or 80s.
I've been on a bit of a binge of the filmmaker's work for research/writing purposes, but I think I might bow out gracefully here. I've seen about 80% of his features, I think? It feels like enough for me, because while the only genuinely bad one I've seen has been Dracula 3D, the majority of his 1990s to 21st-century stuff has done very little for me. But it's been somewhat worthwhile to watch most of his stuff, and I think doing so will make me appreciate his earlier movies even more, should I revisit any of them one day.
I've been on a bit of a binge of the filmmaker's work for research/writing purposes, but I think I might bow out gracefully here. I've seen about 80% of his features, I think? It feels like enough for me, because while the only genuinely bad one I've seen has been Dracula 3D, the majority of his 1990s to 21st-century stuff has done very little for me. But it's been somewhat worthwhile to watch most of his stuff, and I think doing so will make me appreciate his earlier movies even more, should I revisit any of them one day.
Did you know
- TriviaBased on a 2002 screenplay by Dario Argento and Franco Ferrini that was shelved when Cecchi Gori, the production company, filed for bankruptcy.
- ConnectionsFeatures Maniac (2012)
- How long is Dark Glasses?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $228,347
- Runtime
- 1h 26m(86 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content