[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

Prête à tout pour mon enfant, même l'illégalité !

Original title: The College Admissions Scandal
  • TV Movie
  • 2019
  • Tous publics
  • 1h 26m
IMDb RATING
5.9/10
612
YOUR RATING
Prête à tout pour mon enfant, même l'illégalité ! (2019)
Drama

Two wealthy mothers--sought-after interior designer Caroline and Bethany, owner of a successful financial-services firm--share an obsession with getting their teenagers into the best possibl... Read allTwo wealthy mothers--sought-after interior designer Caroline and Bethany, owner of a successful financial-services firm--share an obsession with getting their teenagers into the best possible college.Two wealthy mothers--sought-after interior designer Caroline and Bethany, owner of a successful financial-services firm--share an obsession with getting their teenagers into the best possible college.

  • Director
    • Adam Salky
  • Writer
    • Stephen Tolkin
  • Stars
    • Penelope Ann Miller
    • Mia Kirshner
    • Robert Moloney
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    5.9/10
    612
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Adam Salky
    • Writer
      • Stephen Tolkin
    • Stars
      • Penelope Ann Miller
      • Mia Kirshner
      • Robert Moloney
    • 7User reviews
    • 3Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Awards
      • 3 nominations total

    Photos2

    View Poster
    View Poster

    Top cast38

    Edit
    Penelope Ann Miller
    Penelope Ann Miller
    • Caroline DeVere
    Mia Kirshner
    Mia Kirshner
    • Bethany Slade
    Robert Moloney
    Robert Moloney
    • Jackson Deviers
    Catherine Lough Haggquist
    Catherine Lough Haggquist
    • Erica Valdez
    Arpad Balogh
    Arpad Balogh
    • Agent Rake
    Jessie Fraser
    Jessie Fraser
    • Sarah
    Chris Francisque
    Chris Francisque
    • Assistant
    Forbes Angus
    Forbes Angus
    • Steven Masera
    Tim Beckmann
    Tim Beckmann
    • Morrie Tobin
    Chris Bradford
    Chris Bradford
    • Chris
    Barb Brebner
    • Marnie Stahr
    Tanya Champoux
    Tanya Champoux
    • Laura
    Jeanie Cloutier
    Jeanie Cloutier
    • Lianne
    Fabiola Colmenero
    • Esmeralda
    Sarah Dugdale
    Sarah Dugdale
    • Emma Slade
    Sam Duke
    Sam Duke
    • Danny Devere
    Kurt Evans
    Kurt Evans
    • Joel
    Jade Falcon
    • Courtney
    • Director
      • Adam Salky
    • Writer
      • Stephen Tolkin
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews7

    5.9612
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    5missraze

    This movie misses the mark

    The movie does a good job of pretending it does a good job, which ironically is the subject matter of what these parents and their kids do. This is a Lifetime movie. You really think they're going to tell the full story to the point where it's good enough to deserve a high movie rating? There's a lot glazed over and omitted and purposely misconstrued. But they have to profit off of the sensational story and make a lil movie.

    They are making it seem as if the parents, students, and Rick Singer are the ONLY ones at fault, and those participating members of the universities involved are seen as a select, rare handful of ne'er do wells. When the truth is, the whole thing is a scam. What these parents, students and co-conspirators in the admissions departments etc did differently in this situation, (rather than an admissions corruption being unique from all the other parents whose kids are in top universities), is get caught. It's still happening, with other Rick Singers. There are nepotist, cultist systems at play and full force when it comes to university acceptance. Lori Loughlin is smoke and mirrors. Do not get distracted and do not use her as a shield either, do not throw stones in a glass house at her though she is wrong, too.

    If your grades aren't there, certain people know their kids need to get sports scholarships, so they get their kids into extracurricular activities young. Even if they're not star students. It has nothing to do with being a "minority" as this movie keeps grossly saying. Minorities know better than anyone that in order to get into a top college let alone any college, you have to have good grades to stay on the school sports team and then from there you can get an athletic scholarship or just impress an admissions dept. It's these other people who feel the need to scandalize their kids into success and it's weird to me because 1. You can take the SAT's any time at any age since education is your right and trying again is too, and 2. You're "rich and powerful and famous/know someone famous" so why do you feel the need to do this? Just walk in the school and say "do you know who I am?" But of course the universities can't be so blatant about the fact that they do in fact limitlessly accept these "do you know who I am?" people all the time, so they pretend they have a rigorous qualifications process. Now your kid is studying and training to the point of ill health, while mediocre Scott and Ashley related to this celebrity or that celebrity or who have this "legacy" alumni parent just finesse their way into college. Heck, some don't even have qualifications and they just suddenly have high earning jobs. I check successful people's LinkedIn profiles and there are many who don't have a great university/educational background, and suddenly they have a top executive or vice president of xyz role. Check the LinkedIn of your own manager for starters. Mhm. Smells like nepotism/cultism/favoritism etc to me. But then you get model minorities who have this extensive educational background and a million licenses and they just have a regular job. You got a Master's to manage a little iHop franchisee or to be HR at a little clothing store or the check-in desk at a dentist? I don't think so. But Scott and Ashley with nothing or just a regular Bachelor's at a rinky dink college but maybe went to a great preparatory high school academy manage a hedge fund or are vice prez at a huge corp. So the point is...we're playing their game.

    These celebrities aren't stupid enough to get caught up like this. Something's always in it for them no matter how you or I may think they are stupid. Wool is always pulled over our eyes. Now, yes, many celebrities are much dumber than everyday civilians who are successful. In fact, everyday civilians who are successful make celebrities what they are in the first place; they manage them, train them, interview them, invest in them, blog about them, dress them, schedule them, nurse them, drive them around, and hospitality them. These everyday smarter rich people have celebrity clientele. And celebrities need conservatorships because their lifestyle and financial stupidity shows everyday. Thus you get Rick Singers, Epsteins and Madoffs profiting off of this rich stupidity. And this rich stupidity is used institutionally and no one says anything because these rich stupid celebrity's kids are attending school with each other and the kids of these smart rich everyday people who work with these celebs. Now these kids grow up privy to what their parents do, and what their parents do for THEM. Now there's a cult/culture of nepotizing your kids into this opportunity, this university, this apartment/studio/home. And guess who's stupidly competing with these nepotist cultists? You and me. Well I'm not going too, but clearly you people still are. Because people are still busting their butt trying to get into certain universities when, no matter what you probably do, you will not get accepted to these elite universities and even if you do get accepted, why the freak would you want to?! Unless of course you finessed your way in. There's ALWAYS a finesse, I'm not buying it that this is the only scandal.

    A standard finesse is to get your kid into a sport or music training at school. You knock on their door at night to remind them what's at stake without saying what's at stake. This movie shows the parent sermonizing to their kids what's at stake, and some parents out there do boot camp their kids to do well at school. Now the universities want to scapegoat these rich stupid celebrities, when everyone involved including the celebs are equally nefarious, arriviste and unscrupulous and corrupt and downright nasty. And this movie seems to want to just make it seem like the parents put the universities in a bad position, as if the universities were fooled or lied to or deceived. As if their other students have not done this or some other kind of corruption or ruthless finesse. No. These schools know their lights stay on due to rich stupidity of celebs and the cleverness of the smarter everyday rich people. These schools know if the applicant isn't rich, that they know how to finesse otherwise via a sport scholarship and the rare type, excellent grades. It's the morons who try to get in with genuine grades excellence though. You're not getting picked on for being smart due to jealousy. It's because you're doing something unnecessary, and people are snickering behind their hands at you. Of course it depends on the scholarship but the catch 22 is that if everyone figures out one way to win at a competition (this case, the competition is university acceptance) then that way is now nullified since it becomes a saturated pool. So now you need to one-up that pool and arch over that competition, right?

    Why do you think there is so much racism? If the black or asian kid excels at a school full of white people, or if black neighborhoods have highly performing local schools, either way white people's opportunities are compromised. The finessing starts from day one in kindergarten the area where you want to raise your kid from scratch, not on the day that Felicity Huffman a rich stupid celebrity agreed to work with a guy who's long acquired insane riches from doing the very same thing 100s of times, no matter what the news does to sensationalize it as a rare celebrity scandal. I'm not stupid. There's been a number of finesses to solidify your stupid kid's future. Most people just aren't stupid about it. They put it all off on their kids. That's why I don't understand the people who stereotype black kids as being good at basketball and football and track or hispanics being good at soccer and baseball. Those are top sports that white and asian kids do all the time too lol. And this is a form of finessing your way into university. If you have literally figured out a way to win in a competition, it's a scandal already. Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman were either just stupid (they are celebrities, who are stupid; most celebs did not even finish middle school LOL) or they are still stupid, but they must have known they were going to get exposed. However like I said it's all smoke and mirrors. There are 1000s and 1000s of Stanford, Yale, Dartmouth, NYU, etc alumni/current students/legacy applicants who know that they "figured out a way." Just play this sport in high school and you'll be fine. Model minorities don't feel confident doing just that, so they like to excel academically too. But for the most part, it's not needed. Scandalize your SAT/ACT store, use your parents being alumni/rich/celebrities, and play this sport. The "losers" in life (you and me) didn't know this and thought we actually had to get great grades. I have to laugh.

    You think Stanford etc are good schools because their acceptance rate is low? It's a pyramid scheme profiting off the self worth of these children and their deranged old-school parents who traditionalize getting a degree as the best thing ever. Their acceptance rate isn't low because the required SAT scores are so high. SAT's are a joke anyway. SAT's are a front criterion. Their acceptance rate is low because only a oligarchy of the nation and world's population not only has the money to buy their way into the school but also has the knowledge to do it. Where else do the schools get their money? The sky? And now why would you carry on that sick culture of corruption by pressuring your non-rich or nonwhite child to get into a school? LOL. Stop it. Many great non elite universities will take no SAT at all, or a 900-1200. Stanford ridiculously asks for a 1400+. Now that's not unattainable. It's all rote and some studying and some cheating (don't lie). Everyone has the opportunity to highly score on the SAT, great news right? I'm sure many people with that SAT score still don't get in, though, too right? Screw college. Get a License/Certification and a job and get over it.
    10phd_travel

    Really good look at the scandal from within

    Very well written acted and directed. Lifetime has done a good job at showing the scandal from the point of view of the parents and the children. Managed to incorporate in a composite manner the details and aspects that we know from the headlines. It's nice to go beyond the headlines into their homes to see the detailed genesis of the crime from good intentions and love of their kids to over the line. Felicity and Lori aren't portrayed as characters. But we know who is based on who roughly. Really found Penélope Anne Miller sympathetic as the anxious mom faking her unknowing son's scores and sports record for a place in Stanford. Mia Kirchner is great as a different kind of mom pushier and less repentant. Really hams it up here in this juicy role. There are some pretty funny moments along the way. But things get serious when we get to see the fallout on the kids who have to face the consequences of exposure. The most moving aftermath I've seen in a Lifetime movie for a while.

    Highly recommended
    8LifetimeUncorkedPodcast

    Passing Grade, but like a C passing.

    This movie found a nice balance of creating horrible unlikeable characters. (based on real people, but NOT Lori Loughlin, Felicity Huffman, or anyone alive or dead... for legal reasons.) while still having the characters be ones you love to hate.

    I added an extra star for Emma's hunky boyfriend, Brian!
    6nicolesammut

    Very good Content

    Being from Australia, I found this film very educational in regards to the US College system. I enjoyed the content and thought the film had good entertainment value. However, very sad that money still 'talks'.
    9Ed-Shullivan

    Thumbsuckers! These privileged children ALL KNEW their parents cheated, skipped the normal entry line, and paid BIG $$ for their precious babies way into elite Universities

    The acting in this made for television film which is based on true criminal cases that are still before the courts when this film was released in October 2019, proves that these professional actors can't hold an Oscar to the real actors who happen to be the long list of affluent parents who disregarded all ethics and used their gluttoness wealth to push their children ahead of many hard working and more deserving students who were subsequently rejected.

    The FBI eventually arrested a number of these affluent parents for mail fraud, honest services mail fraud and racketeering. Actor Michael Shanks who plays the real life school fixer named Rick Singer folded like a wet napkin when he was arrested and through a series of FBI wire tapped phone conversations implicated these filthy rich and snobbish parents who felt there was nothing wrong in the dirty manner that they scammed these Ivy League Universities to illegally push their children to the front of the line.

    My only question....is this the first film in a brand new film genre classified as "(PPS) Privileged Parent Scammers" since those arrested for this horrendous crime of the filthy rich and affluent are only the tip of the iceberg. Suicides are sure to follow which is one of the negative reactions to being caught and identified forever on as a "criminal". Please don't let any of these PPS people's crimes get expunged as a one off.

    More like this

    Varsity Blues: Le scandale des admissions universitaires
    6.9
    Varsity Blues: Le scandale des admissions universitaires
    Notre père à tous
    6.6
    Notre père à tous
    Girl in the Garage: The Laura Cowan Story
    6.7
    Girl in the Garage: The Laura Cowan Story
    Not My Family: The Monique Smith Story
    8.0
    Not My Family: The Monique Smith Story
    Husband, Father, Killer: The Alyssa Pladl Story
    6.2
    Husband, Father, Killer: The Alyssa Pladl Story
    Trouple, meurtre et trahison
    6.0
    Trouple, meurtre et trahison
    Sinfidelity
    5.1
    Sinfidelity
    Seaspiracy: La pêche en question
    8.1
    Seaspiracy: La pêche en question
    Sexe, mensonges et meurtre
    5.2
    Sexe, mensonges et meurtre
    Laissée pour morte : L'Histoire d'Ashley Reeves
    6.2
    Laissée pour morte : L'Histoire d'Ashley Reeves
    Gaslit by My Husband: The Morgan Metzer Story
    6.3
    Gaslit by My Husband: The Morgan Metzer Story
    Ashley Madison : Sexe, mensonges et scandale
    6.2
    Ashley Madison : Sexe, mensonges et scandale

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      The film's writer, Stephen Tolkin, worked with Lori Loughlin (who was involved in the real-life college admissions bribery scandal on which the movie is based) in the short-lived WB drama Summerland (2004). Loughlin, who co-created the series with Tolkin and starred as its co-lead (opposite singer Jesse McCartney), and her husband Mossimo Giannulli were both charged by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's office in March 2019 for using a $500,000 donation to the Key Worldwide Foundation to persuade the University of Southern California into accepting their two daughters on women's rowing scholarships, despite neither of them having had any experience in the sport.
    • Quotes

      Caroline DeVere: Is there anything you wouldn't do for Danny? Anything in the world?

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • June 15, 2020 (France)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • The College Admissions Scandal
    • Production company
      • Varsity Films
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 26 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Stereo
    • Aspect ratio
      • 2:1

    Related news

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    Prête à tout pour mon enfant, même l'illégalité ! (2019)
    Top Gap
    By what name was Prête à tout pour mon enfant, même l'illégalité ! (2019) officially released in India in English?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb app
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb app
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb app
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.