IMDb RATING
3.6/10
1.2K
YOUR RATING
Four cousins discover a passage to the Kingdom of Keoherus, trapped in a mysterious world. They must confront the Guardian of Time, dark forces, and beasts to return home.Four cousins discover a passage to the Kingdom of Keoherus, trapped in a mysterious world. They must confront the Guardian of Time, dark forces, and beasts to return home.Four cousins discover a passage to the Kingdom of Keoherus, trapped in a mysterious world. They must confront the Guardian of Time, dark forces, and beasts to return home.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 1 win & 2 nominations total
Nicolas J Greco
- Agot
- (as Nicholas Greco)
Jonathan Dale Moore
- The Hooded Figure
- (credit only)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
So, the story seems absurdly simplified. If it were a book, it's age group would be 7-9 year olds. The "bad guy" never even attacks... he just stands there and asks politely for the magic rock that ends the universe, a couple times. Everything about the movie was *ultra* low effort. CG was *terrible*, and you could tell they were on a greenscreen the whole time. Like the greenscreens that pod-casters use... The acting was poor, but not terrible. Story was childish... like written by a 9 year old for 9 year olds. Dialog and plot was just pathetic.
It's watchable, if you're bored, but don't expect anything of even "barely acceptable" quality.
It's watchable, if you're bored, but don't expect anything of even "barely acceptable" quality.
I generally try find something good about a movie, but this doesn't have much going for it at all. Poorly borrowed storylines, bad quality imagery and CGI, bad acting...
There are several storylines borrowed from other stories, very badly stitched together.
The quality of scenery and CGI would have been better if they acted in front of a TV screen.
The sound quality in many places seemed like they were recording in a bathroom.
With very few exceptions, the acting was extremely weak. They made the weak characters seem even worse as a result.
Overall, an extremely weak storyline dragged out, making a short story very long.
The quality of scenery and CGI would have been better if they acted in front of a TV screen.
The sound quality in many places seemed like they were recording in a bathroom.
With very few exceptions, the acting was extremely weak. They made the weak characters seem even worse as a result.
Overall, an extremely weak storyline dragged out, making a short story very long.
Not a bad movie for kids, but at times the volume of the music far outweighs the voices, making it almost impossible to understand what's being said. The use of subtitles was almost a full-on requirement. Hard to believe that in this day and age this got through passed post-production and onto the final cut. The soundtrack's OK, but shouldn't have overplayed the voices. If it wasn't for this it would have received a higher score. Were they aiming for a Grammy with the soundtrack? Visual effects are okay, the plot was quite predictable with only one real 'surprise' revelation. Kids will probably enjoy it, and on the plus side with the soundtrack booming at you, you won't hear your kids.
This movie can easily be categorized as "B-movie" with very bad acting very bad directing and very bad editing and bad everything even the soundtrack. I really lost my nerves and patience watching this very very bad movie.
Taking 4 girls to an adventure is really a bad thing to start with, making them 2 white and 2 black makes it even worse as its not likely to happen, and making the smallest one (and worst actor..) the smartest ?? Really ?? What were you thinking ?
Please don't waste your time on it. I don't know what they were thinking when they approved it and when they released it. Indeed - Unwatchable.
Taking 4 girls to an adventure is really a bad thing to start with, making them 2 white and 2 black makes it even worse as its not likely to happen, and making the smallest one (and worst actor..) the smartest ?? Really ?? What were you thinking ?
Please don't waste your time on it. I don't know what they were thinking when they approved it and when they released it. Indeed - Unwatchable.
I feel like this film is trolling the intended audience. If you were hoping to see something high fantasy, don't bother. There are pilots more well made than this film. Terrible acting, sloppy effects, awful narrative and probably some of the worst scenes ever put under the Lionsgate name.
This film is a nepotistic journey through an industry that has become so lost in itself, that it actually thinks the public will enjoy it. It's the only reason I could see anyone letting this trash leave the studio, let alone have money thrown at it. It's a terrible piece of film making that really does exemplify that it's all about who you know in the industry. There's very little 'film making' in this necrotic frankenstory that borrows from just about every high fantasy film it can afford to.
This film is a nepotistic journey through an industry that has become so lost in itself, that it actually thinks the public will enjoy it. It's the only reason I could see anyone letting this trash leave the studio, let alone have money thrown at it. It's a terrible piece of film making that really does exemplify that it's all about who you know in the industry. There's very little 'film making' in this necrotic frankenstory that borrows from just about every high fantasy film it can afford to.
Did you know
- TriviaSamantha Ryan's debut.
- How long is Guardians of Time?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Les gardiennes du temps
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $87,177
- Runtime1 hour 39 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content