The DNA of Murder with Paul Holes

I enjoy watching this and seeing the fresh set of eyes on a cold case. I also understand that Paul isn't there to solve the case but to only give new insights into what may have happened. This is a huge help for small town police departments and it's a realistic show.

Of course I want to walk away knowing who did it, but imagine what those families and friends are feeling. I consider this a good show given the fact that they have limited evidence.

The title should be called "Reenactment of Murder". The entire show is just about the story of what might of happened, but there's no discussion of how they used DNA to find the killer or how they found out who did the crime via DNA. They should be discussing how they took the DNA and used familial DNA to find the killer like they did the Golden State Killer, but instead the show is nothing about that. They end the show making you wonder what was the conclusion - will it be shown in the next show -the answer is no, just more of the same open ended crime scenes with no resolution.

I am sure i'll keep watching, not sure yet if because of my crime, psychology or paul holes fetish. .. 2nd episode in now i am left hanging regarding the first case. i initially assumed the case will stretch over to other episodes? the second one however did not resolve nor even mention the last case? huge plus points for: being informative & not using dramatizations. it could be more scientific.

in the 2nd ep. when he went through the case with a mysterious dark haired lady ( who wasn't introduced & whose role i still couldn't figure out) it seems like they are talking to themselves and not bouncing off of each others thoughts.. strange communication dynamic... felt a little too acted.

Let me start off by saying that I've watched every episode in this series thus far. It's called The DNA of Murder, I think it would help if they led with a DNA analysis while telling the story. The story telling and narrating is awesome. The host does a great job and has excellent skills in my opinion. However at the end of the episode you are left with wanting more. There is no follow up to the episode that you watched and you are left with more questions than answers. It would be great if they ran whatever evidence they found so that at the episode it could be revealed.

I admire his amazing work an experience, however where are the DNA results Paul? There is a great work on constructing the cases however the interest deflates when you find out that there is not conclusion from the DNA test. I Really hope to see a second series but with final DNA results, otherwise it should be re-named like unresolved DNA cases.