[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
IMDbPro

Attack of the Giant Leeches

  • 2008
  • Not Rated
  • 1h 18m
IMDb RATING
2.0/10
334
YOUR RATING
Attack of the Giant Leeches (2008)
ComedyDramaHorrorSci-FiThriller

In a small town, the silence is shattered by a rash of disappearances at the swamp near the old deserted factories. Bodies are being discovered with no blood left in their bodies. It's up to... Read allIn a small town, the silence is shattered by a rash of disappearances at the swamp near the old deserted factories. Bodies are being discovered with no blood left in their bodies. It's up to a park ranger and the town sheriff to discover what ungodly creature is responsible for t... Read allIn a small town, the silence is shattered by a rash of disappearances at the swamp near the old deserted factories. Bodies are being discovered with no blood left in their bodies. It's up to a park ranger and the town sheriff to discover what ungodly creature is responsible for these deaths.

  • Director
    • Brett Kelly
  • Writer
    • Jeff O'Brien
  • Stars
    • Mark Courneyea
    • Kerri Draper
    • Kevin Preece
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    2.0/10
    334
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Brett Kelly
    • Writer
      • Jeff O'Brien
    • Stars
      • Mark Courneyea
      • Kerri Draper
      • Kevin Preece
    • 10User reviews
    • 12Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Photos1

    View Poster

    Top cast19

    Edit
    Mark Courneyea
    Mark Courneyea
    • Scott
    • (as Mike Conway)
    Kerri Draper
    • Gracie
    Kevin Preece
    • Sheriff Bucky
    Shawna McSheffrey
    • Mary
    Jody Haucke
    • Walter
    Gary Peterson
    • Grundy Miller
    Ray Besharah
    Ray Besharah
    • Ray
    Mark Singleton
    • Shug
    Trevor Payer
    • Dub
    Laura White
    • Samantha
    Diane Camelin
    • Andy
    Alissa Pritchard
    • Olivia
    Mac Dale
    Mac Dale
    • Patio Man
    Jennifer Froome
    • Patio Woman
    Steven R. Cole
    • Steve The Chef
    • (as Steve Cole)
    Jurgen Vollrath
    • Searcher
    Chris Gaines
    • Search Party
    Mike Goveia
    • Search Party
    • Director
      • Brett Kelly
    • Writer
      • Jeff O'Brien
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews10

    2.0334
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    1jacobjohntaylor1

    This remake sucks.

    I really like the original version this from 1959. But this remake has awful acting. It also an awful script. It is not scary. The 1959 version is very scary. This is not scary at all. Do not see this movie. It is an awful movie.
    5Elvis-Del-Valle

    Cheaper and seedier than the previous one

    To be very honest, this film is undoubtedly inferior to its predecessor since being a remake, it should offer a better caliber in terms of production, special effects and even gore, but instead, it is another more low-budget film that is far from the original version that It had a little more caliber. The only thing that stands out are the animatronic leeches and some other elements, but the movie feels a bit cheap and the blood and effects look quite fake. It's like a movie made by newbies. I rate it with a 5/10 since at the end it is just an unnecessary remake of Roger Corman's original movie.
    1bernardlcrawford

    This what is was like to be tortured by the Spanish Inquisition

    Let us endeavor to conjecture and propose a supposition pertaining to a conundrum I am experiencing after viewing this atrocity. Variable one pertains to a Roger Corman. This is a man with an incredible propensity for the creation of films on a minimal budget and almost ALWAYS a profit on his investment. He truly is the king of exploitation films. This being a remake (probably due to the film being out of copyright date) is of a 1959 movie he made.

    So how does one create a movie to begin with on a minimal budget that still exceeds the product created decades later? Could it be an overwhelming plethora of non-talent?

    I have a great affinity for actors that do horrible hillbilly stereotypes with Canadian accents. The "Leeches" are hand puppets that can be misconstrued for earthworms on steroids. I did find the "rifle" that was supposed to be a shotgun but was a toy musket seen multiple times. They try to exploit young ladies which has absolutely no impact in sexually gratuity within the film. We get a few scenes of a marsh but the action takes place around a lake, no marsh or swamp. Our hillbillies are supposed to be comical relief while we wait for a meteorite to plummet to earth and obliterate them. The sheriff inhabits room 12 with crap being stored in some building somewhere.

    Let us examine one scene in particular. A search party has been gathered to attempt to locate two bodies. Several men follow the sheriff down the shore of a lake, not a marsh. All follow after the sheriff. Would it not behoove them to "Spread out" instead of following him and looking at their feet literally as they walk? One idiot is looking up in the trees where many a body has been known to be discovered. If only the Lockness monster would have interjected itself into the movie and consumed the entire cast, that would have been worth watching.

    The Corman version of this movie receives a 3.5 on the IMDb which sounds about right. If you view the MST3K riffing of the Corman movie then it is a 7.0 as this film rates a 1.9 and should be considerably lower.

    After viewing this movie I made preparation to invoke the great Cuthulu and the old ones to enter this dimension to rule but they declined because it is too dark and forbidding a place even for them and with absolutely nothing original that can be done in writing, films or art we are all in a pathetic Hell anyway.
    1robertdlar

    Watch the original

    So first off I saw the original on Creature Feature when I was like 7 and it was scary and creepy. AS bas as that movie was the costumes looked amazing (for the time) and being black and white made it even scarier. While it may have been shlocky the actors all took the roles seriosly and the horror in their faces felt genuine.

    I have litterally seen high school plays with better acting that this movie, and the 'so called screams' of the actors is nothing short of laughable, too bad the movie is not funny at all even a 'so bad its funny' mode. Save your time.
    6drystyx

    The old joke about "sound" technicians

    There is an old joke about "sound" technicians, common in the business. "They don't know what the hell they're doing." And low budget films suffer from it. Sound technicians make and break a film more than people know.

    This film is a remake, very true to the original about giant monsters in a swamp. Like the original, the giant monsters come across more as "killers" than leeches.

    The low budget has its shortcomings, but this really turned out very well.

    The actors struggled, but when all of the actors struggle, you have to look and listen close. It becomes obvious that they had to sacrifice a lot for audibility. You can tell that the actors were of higher quality than they looked.

    The original ATTACK OF THE GIANT LEECHES was the king of cheese, with the champion of all time cheese still, when the muscle bound hero has a gun in one hand and a skimpy dressed, shapely blonde in the other.

    And the original was not the classic science fiction style of the problem solving characters in the forefront. In fact, they were the backdrop, with the yokels in the forefront. The original was mostly Yvette Vickers, the sultry, shapely, super sexy long haired blond. It was her story. The original was Yvette 98%.

    Here, the Yvette Vickers character is in the backdrop. Much of the reason is the production style.

    The original used darker sets, which complimented the blond vixen. Here, we have bright sunshine. And bright sunshine is the enemy of blonde hair and pale skin. Our vixen is hardly a sexpot in this light. Nothing against the actress. She would be stunning in a dark light.

    Which may be why we have the three needless additional girls in bikinis, whose darker complexions are more complimented by bright light. They serve little purpose for the story. However, their comic relief is fairly well placed.

    While the vixen was the story in the original, in this version there are no favorites. Everyone has almost equal time.

    Yet while the characters have close to equal time, the classic science fiction style of a focal group of principals is used.

    What helps this low budget survive the turmoils of poor sound quality is "the characters". And the actors. Those who serve for comic relief are very adept. And the serious characters are better than your average film characters.

    The camera work gives it an "ordinary" look, and the cast looks incredibly "next door neighbor" style, which works very well. While it is low budget, and sound quality is poor, it looks well blocked, and there are more assets than defects. This is very watchable. And despite some crinks, it is much more entertaining and satisfying than most of the modern science fiction you'll find with bigger budgets.

    There are some nit picks. I didn't care for the "canned" macho fist fight, but that is minor, and pretty much a staple in action movies.

    One gets the feeling that the editing wasn't quite ready. I wouldn't be surprised if it is reedited in the future, and that would make a huge difference.

    More like this

    Attack of the Giant Leeches
    3.8
    Attack of the Giant Leeches
    Kaiju Glam Metal Shark Attack
    5.9
    Kaiju Glam Metal Shark Attack
    Jurassic Shark: Terreur des mers
    1.5
    Jurassic Shark: Terreur des mers
    Konga TNT
    1.8
    Konga TNT
    Galaxy Warriors
    4.4
    Galaxy Warriors
    She-Rex
    1.4
    She-Rex
    Nanoshark
    4.9
    Nanoshark
    Iron Thor
    1.4
    Iron Thor
    Spyfall
    2.1
    Spyfall
    Morphman
    4.3
    Morphman
    Infestation
    5.8
    Infestation
    La Ligue des vengeurs
    1.6
    La Ligue des vengeurs

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Connections
      Remake of Attack of the Giant Leeches (1959)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • July 7, 2008 (Canada)
    • Country of origin
      • Canada
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Hiigelkaanide rünnak
    • Filming locations
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • Production company
      • Dudez Productions
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 18 minutes
    • Color
      • Color

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.