Some Kind of Justice

This pathetic attempt to damage the reputation of this actress is typical of the childish fanaticism of the animal rights terrorists. This actress has devoted over 40 years of her life to ANIMAL WELFARE!!! Animal Welfare or Animal Rights? Here are some of the differences: As animal welfare advocates. . .

• We seek to improve the treatment and well-being of animals.

• We support the humane treatment of animals that ensures comfort and freedom from unnecessary pain and suffering.

• We believe we have the right to "own" animals -- they are our property.

• We believe animal owners should provide loving care for the lifetime of their animals.

As animal rights activists. . .

• They seek to end the use and ownership of animals, including the keeping of pets.

• They believe that any use of an animal is exploitation so, not only must we stop using animals for food and clothing, but pet ownership must be outlawed as well.

• They want to obtain legal rights for animals as they believe that animals and humans are equal.

• They use false and unsubstantiated allegations of animal abuse to raise funds, attract media attention and bring supporters into the movement. (The Inhumane Crusade, Daniel T. Oliver)

PeTA = Pathetic Ethics Towards Animals.

Their motto is "Better Dead Than Fed".

Pity the NC courts didn't fry the lowlifes who acquired those poor, defenseless animals by lying, then killed them in their van and dumped them like trash.

Hypocrite thugs.

Take your pathetic attempt to throw dirt at Ms Brinkley by posting to a movie forum and stuff it. I guess you gave a rave review to the lousy PeTA-endorsed movie starring Molly Shannon.

Elizabeth Brinkley rocks.

Two thumbs up for animal WELFARE - flush the animal rightists like the turds they are.

I particularly enjoyed the tension between FBI Agent Morgan and Private Investigator Brodski as they are both determined to solve the case before the other, and the total lack of protocol by Morgan (who doesn't get any respect from his subordinates). The relationship between these two could have been developed further in this film. Also enjoyable was the Profiler delving into the psyche of the serial killer. I thought the nudity wasn't overly done and did not detract the quality of this film. Pay attention to flashback scenes. After hearing and reading the news in Harrisburg the last month or so, this story could actually have happened!

This is a movie you need to watch more than once.

It has a very interesting cult-like feeling and a rawness at times that is super real. The acting is uneven at times but in general doesn't really hurt the film's story line. There are also some funny moments between the detectives, the police chef and the profiler.

I liked the fact that the profiler really enjoyed getting into the sicko head of the killer. The use of flash backs can get a bit confusing. You have to remember them to get to the bottom of this complicated story. This is why you may want to watch it more than once. Be aware there is some graphic nudity. Good thing it is in B&W

If you like RAW and feeling like a voyeur in an odd story, you will like this.

Films are information for a viewers discretion not for personal attacks on the actors(es). I personally have not seen the movie. I do not watch much TV due to the nudity & profanity that is shown in most films. A personal attack on Elizabeth Brinkley is not only absurd but shows exactly the paranoid mental state this person is in by attacking this woman professionally. The agenda of PeTA & HSUS is to stop ALL EATING, KEEPING, BREEDING & Using of ALL Animals. "Higher Court" and others like him are terrorists who live among us and are destroying our freedom and the world as we known it. His opinions of Elizabeth Brinkley are of personal opinion and is not one of her acting ability. Please delete this mans comments of Elizabeth Brinkley.