[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

La bataille de Bassora

Original title: The Mark of Cain
  • 2007
  • R
  • 1h 27m
IMDb RATING
6.4/10
1.6K
YOUR RATING
La bataille de Bassora (2007)
DramaWar

Uses detailed research and explosive new testimonies by soldiers who have served in Iraq to tell an emotional fictional story of two young men very much out of their depth.Uses detailed research and explosive new testimonies by soldiers who have served in Iraq to tell an emotional fictional story of two young men very much out of their depth.Uses detailed research and explosive new testimonies by soldiers who have served in Iraq to tell an emotional fictional story of two young men very much out of their depth.

  • Director
    • Marc Munden
  • Writer
    • Tony Marchant
  • Stars
    • Gerard Kearns
    • Matthew McNulty
    • Naomi Bentley
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    6.4/10
    1.6K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Marc Munden
    • Writer
      • Tony Marchant
    • Stars
      • Gerard Kearns
      • Matthew McNulty
      • Naomi Bentley
    • 13User reviews
    • 8Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Won 1 BAFTA Award
      • 6 wins & 13 nominations total

    Photos2

    View Poster
    View Poster

    Top cast40

    Edit
    Gerard Kearns
    Gerard Kearns
    • Mark 'Treacle' Tate
    Matthew McNulty
    Matthew McNulty
    • Shane Gulliver
    Naomi Bentley
    Naomi Bentley
    • Shelley
    Elliot Cowan
    Elliot Cowan
    • Captain Worriss
    Brendan Coyle
    Brendan Coyle
    • Davey Gulliver
    Heather Craney
    Heather Craney
    • Brenda Tate
    Shaun Dingwall
    Shaun Dingwall
    • Major Godber
    Shaun Dooley
    Shaun Dooley
    • Corporal Gant
    Leo Gregory
    Leo Gregory
    • Lance Corporal Quealey
    Alistair Petrie
    Alistair Petrie
    • Major Rod Gilchrist
    Pip Torrens
    Pip Torrens
    • Colonel Hampton
    Roger Barclay
    Roger Barclay
    • Adjutant
    Matthew Gravelle
    Matthew Gravelle
    • Chaplain
    Kevin Knapman
    • Pvt Soldier 1
    Simon Naylor
    • Pvt Soldier 2
    Andrew Readman
    Andrew Readman
    • Military Doctor
    Barry Sloane
    Barry Sloane
    • TA Pvt Glynn
    Paul Stocker
    • Guard Soldier
    • Director
      • Marc Munden
    • Writer
      • Tony Marchant
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews13

    6.41.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    8rcadean

    Vivid, distateful and unsettling, but representative?

    This isn't a war film per se, but rather a film about the conflict between loyalty and morality. The question is where do you draw the line between loyalty to the regiment and the morality of your actions? This film is powerful stuff but I can't help but feel that this film is somehow unrepresentative of the British Army in Iraq. I have to say that it has left a rather foul taste in my mouth, but this may well be down to my refusal to think about the examples of brutality in custody that have taken place rather than the film's depiction of those crimes. So in regards to the effectiveness of the film at portraying its subject the film is most effective. The acting is strong throughout as is the cinematography and the sparse soundtrack. I won't watch it again as I have nothing further to gain from it. I think, in retrospect that it is still too recent an event to gain any further wisdom from. Although it is not 'based on true events' there have been instances of abuse that have culminated in criminal cases. But would we gain anything from watching a feature film about the abuses at Abu Grahib only three years after the events?
    7graphi

    Almost good

    Although Mark of Cain isn't a bad movie, and most of the acting is in fact pretty good, it seems to be lacking a clear purpose. For a movie that aims to make a political statement, it seems to pull its punches at the most crucial moments. As a movie that wants to tell a story about a modern war, although realistic and often gritty, it is not nearly as powerful as Platoon or as intricate as Jarhead. In fact, the power of the story seems to peter out after the first two-thirds of the movie. For example, the technique of starting with a crucial scene, and then flashing back to this scene as the story unfolds, becomes less powerful. Eventually, the viewer pretty well knows what to expect. Watch Mark of Cain, expect some poignant scenes, but don't expect any new insights in that fiasco known as Iraq and don't expect to see war's truly horrific face.
    7raven22-2

    Very good effort

    This movie had its World Premiere at the International Film Festival Rotterdam. Unfortunately it didn't have any subtitles, so the British-English dialog was sometimes very hard to understand.

    The movie follows a group of British soldiers in Iraq showing their sometimes forced humiliation against Iraqi soldiers, their psychological problems, the cover ups in the British army and the outcome during a trial.

    The movie is obviously low budget, but the outcome is very well. The first quarter of the film starts powerful, then it skips to TV drama style for a while, (i didn't really like that) but the ending is again very powerful.

    7.5/10. I wonder if this movie is still going to be aired on television or if they decide to release this is in cinema. It is certainly a lot better than the standard blockbuster films we see....
    bob the moo

    Falls down a bit in the final third but is mostly strong and convincing

    Once the mission was "accomplished" in Iraq and the end of major combat operations was announced, parts of the country were handed over to the armed forces for the purposes of enforcing the peace and winning over the hearts and minds of the newly free Iraqi people. A group of British soldiers are stationed in Basra to this end under a steady commander. However when a patrol is ambushed and their commander is lost, the decision is made to enforce justice fast and hard to send a clear message out.

    This was originally down to be screened in the week that the British sailors were being held after being captured supposedly in Iranian waters. Channel 4 folded under pressure and pulled the screening because it was said it may "inflame" the situation and make it harder for the UK to find a democratic solution. I'm not sure if this was true (as it turned out they were actually released on the day this was postponed) because it was only ever going to be watched by a million or two if that, plus the story was already contrasting obviously with footage of how the US and UK treated prisoners (which I assume was why Iran made such a big show of how they hold our prisoners).

    Anyway, although it is stated up front that this is a work of fiction, it is clear that it has been very well researched because it does strike home as very convincing. This is most evident in the first half as the squaddies patrol the Basra streets, innocence is lost, violence is sudden and the soldiers react in different ways. This much is very well done and the script rings true. The main scene of action is really well delivered and it is well used as it folds into the changes in the characters and what they end up doing. This is rather lost near the end where I wasn't sold on it. Suddenly the script becomes clunky with characters speaking in "moral arguments" and speeches rather than sounding like real people. This also coincides with the narrative becoming weaker as well.

    To me this occurred where we went too much into the court case and had too much said that didn't need to be said. It would have been better to have had a much more subtle touch but it doesn't manage it. It is a shame and not even the performances of the lead two can totally convince in these later stages. This is saying something though because I thought the cast was mostly very good, with particular credit being owed to Kearns and McNulty. Gregory and Dooley are also strong and it is only some of the actors playing the brass who are a bit weaker.

    Despite the flaws associated with the final third, the film is actually very strong and convincingly written and delivered.
    9recrea33

    we came to liberate

    this is an important war movie. the best war movie i've seen since 'three kings' not much shooting or setpiece explosive action mind you. movie critics are uneasy at its stark portrayal of dysfunctional army ways and its psychopathic sergeant whilst we are still in the midst of that same war.

    it seems disloyal somehow. to our boys in the field to lay bare the prosaic anatomy of torture so powerfully. but i think this is a film all true soldiers will love.

    they say the first casualty of war is truth and they're not far wrong. because war is horrendous.

    it's just a damn shame that after all the classic Vietnam war movies that there will be another crop of classic iraq war movies. (eg gunner palace)

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Goofs
      When Gulliver and Tate are outside, before they go to beat the prisoners, the scene changes from morning to the middle of the night, after watching the other soldiers walk towards the cells and cut back to them talking.
    • Connections
      Featured in Screenwipe: Review of the Year 2007 (2007)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ

    • How long is The Mark of Cain?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • October 18, 2007 (Netherlands)
    • Country of origin
      • United Kingdom
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • The Mark of Cain
    • Filming locations
      • Bolton School, Chorley New Road, Bolton, Greater Manchester, England, UK(barracks quad)
    • Production companies
      • Red Production Company
      • Channel 4 Television Corporation
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Gross worldwide
      • $9,877
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 27 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Dolby Digital
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.