Wages of Sin

This not scary. It has an awful story line. It has an awful ending. It is really bad. It has an awful ending do not see it. It is awful. It one of the worst horror movies I have seen. Do not waste your money do not see it.

I just rented Wages of Sin. I thought it was an OK movie.

You have to respect what the filmmaker was trying to do. Some of it was very good. The acting was good compared to a number of low-budget films I have seen lately. The two lead actresses are quite attractive with some good performances. The two lead actors are quite handsome and the acting was very good too, as was the little girl who I thought was great. As far as the Preacher, he was pretty creepy, and his twisted views were interesting. Some of the imagery, lighting and camera work was pretty good. As was the directing over all. And considering the budget, as it is said to be low-budget, then all I can say is well done. I truly think the movie is worth watching. My friends and I watch every horror that comes out, this one definitely makes a mark. Sincerely, Valiant

The only reason why I thought it didn't deserve lower than a 3 was because it looked like it was shot in a professional manner, and the blond guy has a few good lines. Like when he felt guilty about being intimate with his gf because of the nutty religious guy, and a few other subtle lines that were funny. Otherwise, I just don't find anything scary about a Christian ghost. The acting may not merit awards, but it was believable. If this isn't professionally made, let me just say, good job. I would think of it as a 4, had it not been such a terrible story.

With all due respect to zootie's comments I actually found a bit more positive in this movie. Perhaps it's because I've come off a recent run of really bad ones so by comparison this seemed much better than it really was..who knows. But it wasn't like it was putting me to sleep or anything...and truthfully I found the performances of Ashlie Clark (very nice looking!) and Brandon Michael to be palatable...certainly a notch above the rest of the cast. I do agree with zootie's estimation of the photography and production values...far superior to a lot of the "financially challenged" (politically correct term for low budget) horror flicks I've seen. With 2 fairly attractive females in the cast I was somewhat surprised that this film didn't take the usual "let's toss in some gratuitous nudity so more people will watch it" but I'm actually glad they didn't. Yes, the story tends to stumble over itself and the ending lacks a payoff but on the other hand I admire what the filmmakers tried to achieve and how they went about it. I assure you that although is not a great film, it is better than a lot of the other crap being released that I've had the misfortune of seeing.

A young woman inherits a house from her biological family whom she does not remember. The family has a few dark secrets, and the spirits of the dead refuse to remain silent, particularly an overzealous preacher.

Ashlie Victoria Clark is a beautiful and capable actress, as other reviewers have pointed out. However, that doesn't prove to be enough to save this boring film with a weak script and average directing. This is the very definition of a forgettable film, and I've already begun to forget it a mere thirty minutes after watching it.

Clark tried her hand at acting a few more times and fell silent after that. I blame this film. She gave her all, but was derailed by appearing in a cruddy movie. Don't bother to watch it. It's available for cheap as a 4-pack, but the only good film in the pack is "Roman", so just buy that one by itself and you'll be fine.