Wages of Sin

Normally I would watch a movie and pass it on, this is a rare occasion.

Upon watching this movie, I was a bit surprised with how bad the acting was, I mean, I could make a better movie with stuffed animals and a 1960s Bell and Howell camera. Holy crap this was a bad movie.

I did have nightmares from it but not in the ways one would think, it was so bad I got nightmares. So, if you're looking to waste 2 hours (it feels like an entire lifetime) and get scared because of how god awful it is, be my guest.

I just rented Wages of Sin. I thought it was an OK movie.

You have to respect what the filmmaker was trying to do. Some of it was very good. The acting was good compared to a number of low-budget films I have seen lately. The two lead actresses are quite attractive with some good performances. The two lead actors are quite handsome and the acting was very good too, as was the little girl who I thought was great. As far as the Preacher, he was pretty creepy, and his twisted views were interesting. Some of the imagery, lighting and camera work was pretty good. As was the directing over all. And considering the budget, as it is said to be low-budget, then all I can say is well done. I truly think the movie is worth watching. My friends and I watch every horror that comes out, this one definitely makes a mark. Sincerely, Valiant

The only reason why I thought it didn't deserve lower than a 3 was because it looked like it was shot in a professional manner, and the blond guy has a few good lines. Like when he felt guilty about being intimate with his gf because of the nutty religious guy, and a few other subtle lines that were funny. Otherwise, I just don't find anything scary about a Christian ghost. The acting may not merit awards, but it was believable. If this isn't professionally made, let me just say, good job. I would think of it as a 4, had it not been such a terrible story.

Don't tackle a subject or genre such as this with no budget...a valiant effort maybe, but to expect people to watch it? Nah. Would love to know how many drafts the script went through...my guess is none, its shocking. But the director DOES have a pretty good (if very slow) eye, and my guess is some of the actors sensed a weak story and over acted in a bid to compensate. It is VERY difficult to make a convincing horror when you have absolutely no funds to pull it off. Mike Watt does, but he doesn't take himself, or his movies, too seriously, and thats why people love him. As a result, the make ups are lousy, the script is SUPER lousy, and you can tell they had no choice but to cop out of some key scenes which would have made the movie a lot better.

I agree with one reviewer, Ashlie Clark is beautiful,can scream her ass off, and is the ONLY reason I give it as much as three stars.

This not scary. It has an awful story line. It has an awful ending. It is really bad. It has an awful ending do not see it. It is awful. It one of the worst horror movies I have seen. Do not waste your money do not see it.