Unadulterated

Disclosure: this short was filmed in my house, so I know the story and the director/writer quite well.

The "supposed" review of this short could be applied to ANY film. There is not one detail in this "alledged" review which would lead one to believe that this "critic" had even seen the short (and since it was a local production, I tend to think not).

A valid critique is one thing, but to slam and trash is another. Sure, this short isn't going to win an Academy Award, but that's not the point. Even Spielberg had to start somewhere. Give struggling artistes a break, will ya?