[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

A for Andromeda

  • TV Movie
  • 2006
  • 1h 30m
IMDb RATING
5.3/10
784
YOUR RATING
A for Andromeda (2006)
DramaSci-FiThriller

In the Yorkshire Dales, a group of scientists receive radio signals from the Andromeda Galaxy. Once decoded, these give them a computer program that can design a human clone. One physicist d... Read allIn the Yorkshire Dales, a group of scientists receive radio signals from the Andromeda Galaxy. Once decoded, these give them a computer program that can design a human clone. One physicist decides it is a Trojan horse and decides to destroy the computer.In the Yorkshire Dales, a group of scientists receive radio signals from the Andromeda Galaxy. Once decoded, these give them a computer program that can design a human clone. One physicist decides it is a Trojan horse and decides to destroy the computer.

  • Director
    • John Strickland
  • Writers
    • John Elliot
    • Richard Fell
    • Fred Hoyle
  • Stars
    • Tom Hardy
    • Charlie Cox
    • Kelly Reilly
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    5.3/10
    784
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • John Strickland
    • Writers
      • John Elliot
      • Richard Fell
      • Fred Hoyle
    • Stars
      • Tom Hardy
      • Charlie Cox
      • Kelly Reilly
    • 16User reviews
    • 3Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Photos

    Top cast10

    Edit
    Tom Hardy
    Tom Hardy
    • John Fleming
    Charlie Cox
    Charlie Cox
    • Dennis Bridger
    Kelly Reilly
    Kelly Reilly
    • Christine Jones…
    Jane Asher
    Jane Asher
    • Professor Madeleine Dawnay
    David Haig
    David Haig
    • General Vandenberg
    Colin Stinton
    Colin Stinton
    • Kaufman
    Robert Gill
    • Scientist
    Thushani Weerasekera
    • Teacher
    Janet Spencer-Turner
    • Doctor
    David Maybrick
    David Maybrick
    • Orderly
    • Director
      • John Strickland
    • Writers
      • John Elliot
      • Richard Fell
      • Fred Hoyle
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews16

    5.3784
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    1paulj-murphy

    Absolutely awful pseudoscience and wretched acting

    Any schoolboy would be ashamed of the scientific mistakes in this. For example, the team send radio messages to Andromeda and get immediate replies! Andromeda is millions of light years away and so any radio signals would take millions of years to get there and back! Also, at one point in the story a technician saves a genome or record of the entire genetic code of a human being on a single floppy disk! Fred Hoyle would be rotating in his grave.

    The acting is equally bad. The two male leads are the "geekiest" type of anoraks one could possibly hope not to meet, and they are as wet as they come. Neither speak their lines clearly. And the Army General is about as nonmilitary as you could get...he looks like your average window cleaner.

    Please please please just go back to making them the way they originally did in the sixties, BBC...
    9robert-temple

    An excellent remake of Fred Hoyle's sci fi morality tale

    'A FOR ANDROMEDA is an example of what could be called conceptual science fiction', says producer Alison Willett in the 'extras' of the DVD of this film. She hoped the BBC would commission more of that, but it did not. They declined for instance to remake the sequel. This film was made in ten days on a low budget, but the result overcame those limitations. The casting was inspired. Jane Asher was superb as the woman professor, perfectly underplaying the role to make it more effective. And the irresistible Kelly Reilly plays both the young mathematician and her double, the space girl Andromeda. She has a way of mesmerising viewers, which was just what was needed. I have read some of the other reviews of this film and was shocked that some of them seem to have been so disappointed to see a thinker's rather than a thrill-seeker's sci fi movie. There are no exploding cars, machine guns, colliding stars, grey aliens, or terrifying ogres in this film, not even a single spaceship. When the initial TV series of this story was broadcast in 1961 (see my review), it caused a nationwide sensation in the UK. The astronomer and astrophysicist Sir Fred Hoyle's concept of a radio signal from another galaxy transmitting a code for the creation of an alien being blew the collective minds of the public. The usual BBC idiots wiped most of that series and only one whole episode, part of the final episode, and a few scattered fragments survived; a book of the story followed. The next year the sequel story was transmitted as ANDROMEDA BEAKTHROUGH (1962, see my review, as this series does survive in its entirety), and the book of that followed in 1965. The first series introduced the beautiful Julie Christie as the alien girl Andromeda; she did not yet know how to act, but everyone was dazzled by her looks. She was unavailable for the sequel, so the girl alien was played by Susan Hampshire. (I got to know her in the following year but she never once mentioned her recent adventure as a space creature.) To return to the newer film, another key ingredient was the well-measured and low key performance by Tom Hardy as the brilliant young scientist, who is the only one who can work the computer built according to the specifications of the signal. The film was excellently directed by John Strickland. The film is also a love story. And of course there is also some spying, an irate general, and an underground bunker. It all works, whatever some soreheads may claim. I knew Fred Hoyle pretty well. He shook the world up with his first science fiction novel, THE BLACK CLOUD (1957), which has suddenly become more relevant again in a surprising way. It needs to be pointed out that many of the aspects of A FOR ANDROMEDA have also become surprisingly relevant at the moment. I have no space to elaborate on this. But it all goes to show that Fred was decades ahead of his time in just about everything. And, by the way, there was no Big Bang. Fred was right about that too. The time is coming when everyone will be forced to admit it, no matter how much of a blow to their pride it may be to do so. Geniuses like Fred do not come along often enough.
    7robertemerald

    Serviceable and intelligent first encounter movie

    A For Andromedia has a great story and good script, it is a work of intelligent science fiction. Science Fiction fans will have no problem getting through this work. The movie itself suffers for its low budget. The story needed to be projected forward in time. It's premise is on much safer ground in today's computing world than 2006, and would be even safer years from now. The movie needed a budget that reflected that. It comes across as a sort of play (or at least it did for me) which required my imagination and understanding to make it work. Face it, it's an intriguing idea for a movie. Working really hard are the cast, which is appreciated. One also has to appreciate the BBC, whom in this project, put their faith in cerebral sci fi. It certainly works, but could have had a better visual dimension, and if this story ever does, I'll certainly sign up for the reboot.
    9learnersnation

    i liked it

    Its wonderful creative work under minimal budget, i don't think most of the people will understand and like it. Some of us will love it who good imagination =)
    4stuart_poore

    An uninspired remake

    ** Contains minor spoiler**

    Despite being a remake of the 1960s BBC series, this comes across as an uninspired cross between Contact and Species. It is filmed using the typical cheap BBC Sci-Fi manner i.e. dull, grey, overcast and in a quarry. They spend the budget on the one "special effect", which is, of course, destroyed at the end. The story is unconvincing and the basic science is badly flawed (real time communication to Andromeda anyone?)

    It tries to pad out a thin story line with the addition of a few extraneous few subplots, namely a love triangle, some espionage and the oh so stereotypical "government subverting science for evil" thing. Even Jane Asher can't drag this up from being a long, slow, and predictable hour and a half.

    More like this

    Le Déserteur
    5.3
    Le Déserteur
    Attraction fatale
    6.7
    Attraction fatale
    Meadowlands
    6.8
    Meadowlands
    Oliver Twist
    7.3
    Oliver Twist
    Colditz
    6.7
    Colditz
    Stuart: une vie à l'envers
    7.6
    Stuart: une vie à l'envers
    Star Trek: Nemesis
    6.4
    Star Trek: Nemesis
    The Take
    7.7
    The Take
    Minotaur
    3.7
    Minotaur
    EMR
    5.3
    EMR
    Capone
    4.7
    Capone
    The Virgin Queen
    7.4
    The Virgin Queen

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      The production was broadcast live to mirror A for Andromeda (1961). The same was true of The Quatermass Experiment (2005), which was a remake of The Quatermass Experiment (1953). Both A for Andromeda (1961) and The Quatermass Experiment (1953) are acclaimed BBC science fiction serials which are largely missing from the archives.
    • Connections
      Remake of A for Andromeda (1961)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • November 8, 2006 (France)
    • Country of origin
      • United Kingdom
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Для Андромеды
    • Filming locations
      • Brecon Beacons, Powys, Wales, UK
    • Production company
      • British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 30 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Stereo
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.33 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.