The Company

Having read the book, I feel that the screenwriter did a magnificent job in conveying the story & characters. Almost 900 pages of a very complex novel were captured in a clear, understandable way. Michael Keaton's performance in particular, was as my husband said, "Awesome". This is no surprise to us because he has always been so versatile. I noticed that although some of the scenes in the book could have been shown as they were written, very graphic & difficult to watch, they instead played to our imagination, which for me, is enough, & pointed out the Class of this presentation. Too many stories on TV are played for sensationalism, without regard for the viewers' sensibilities. I can see Emmys in this series' future.

This is a compelling watch, one of the best I have ever seen on this subject, and I have seen many. The performances are wonderful, especially the three Yale friends who take divergent paths. Alfred Molina is great, as ever. I especially liked Ted Atherton as Frank Wizner.

But did anyone ever call Kim Philby "Adrian"? Maybe James Jesus Angleton: he was just weird enough. (Weird, also, to see him portrayed by Tom Hollander, who played Burgess in Cambridge Spies). And while Angleton suspected Philby, he did not send him tearing off to Moscow -- Philby returned to London, where he was interrogated by effectively cleared (by Harold MacMillan, among others) and on later to Beirut, as a journalist, which allowed him to return to working for MI6 and, presumably, the KGB. It was his MI6 friend Nicholas Elliott who finally broke him, prompting Philby to flee to Moscow in 1962. From Beirut.

But the fictional elements work well enough to make this a very watchable mini-series. And they have an artistic truth that factual manipulations do not spoil.

I dispute the comments that find the series to be anti-American. Some Americans apparently still believe that their country is without fault. There is no reasoning with such people. Having Chris O'Donnell's Jack query how "good" the "good guys" were is just realism, honesty and moral principle: it only takes two words to show that the USA is not always interested in right: Salvador Allende.

As the Hungarian revolutionary Arpad tells Jack in Budapest in 1956, revolutions are fought for three reasons: honour, fear and self-interest. He claims the first two for himself and his comrades. He shrewdly assesses the third as the principal rationale of the US. And who can honestly say otherwise? This programme, as well as Jack, endorses that view.

Michael Keaton's performance is spellbinding, astounding. I couldn't believe what I was watching. When he's on screen, he lifts the piece onto a wholly different level. Unreservedly worth watching for his screen time alone. The unnerving atmosphere he creates happily offsets the unfortunate mawkishness that marrs parts of the Berlin and Budapest stories. Alfred Molina also deserves praise for a strong, gutsy performance as a permanently booze-fueled, no nonsense old time field commander. Production values are pretty high for a television series - Ridley Scott's production presence no doubt helped on that front - and the post-war look and atmosphere of the Berlin sequences is particularly well realised. But this is unmistakably Keaton's tour-de-force.

Where to begin. The performances in the show are quite good the action is established and the historical aspect of the show is right on in most respects. The cast includes a few veteran actors and a few younger actors. Rory Cochrane from CSI Miami, and Chris O'Donnell from the Batman* movies and the Bachelor are cast in very good roles. Followed by Alfred Molina and Michael Keaton taking on the leading roles, who I might add fit there roles perfectly. Having only seen the first of the three episodes and watching the preview for the next two I see that the show will go on only to get better with the addition of even more actors and cameo's from some of my personal favorites the outlook is good. In my opinion espionage has never looked so good.

I thought that The Company was brilliant!! I enjoyed all 6 hours of the mini series!! When was the last time a movie(series) revolved around such an event as The Bay Of Pigs?? I know I haven't, and it's probably because it was a huge flop as a tactic and made the U.S and JFK look foolish. Plus the series doesn't just focus on one aspect of U.S. and world history, it focuses on the CIA's involvement in The Cold War from just after WWII, until the early 1990's, which entails a huge portion of 20th century history. The Company involved so many important world events that it in my opinion, it far surpassed any other movie/series of its kind. These days all of the movies are about much more physical wars such as Pearl Harbor, Letters From Iwo Jima, Saving Private Ryan, etc. It's just really refreshing to see a movie/series that is not just so unique in it's composure, but also shows the opinions of the "war" from both sides.