11:59

I saw this film at the Idaho International Film Festival (it was actually the only feature I was able to attend), and it intrigued me.

There are a few flaws, mainly a few actors who didn't give it their all, I felt, but the lead actor helps the film by taking it seriously and overshadowing the others. I'm definitely looking forward to seeing him in future films.

My biggest qualm with "ll:59" was the over-use of choppy editing. I understand the need to show disorientation, but the scenes in the news room would often cut - not to another angle - but to what appeared to be another take from the same angle. Just very unnatural.

However, the film got all of these kinks out of its system by the end of the first act, and I felt the rest of the film carried itself along quite nicely.

I would be extremely happy if my first film (which I am currently producing) turns out as well as this film has. Great job, guys, and good luck and God bless on your future endeavors!

Pretty much sums it up. If you're into good stories, this one is good...if you can get past the really bad acting. AWFUL AWFUL ACTING. I'M NOT JOKING...buuuutttt....goooooood story. it's (really ironic actually).

So I'd watch it if I were you since I LOVE GOOD STORIES and can imagine good actors in the place of bad actors SINCE I WATCH THE MOVIE IN THE THEATER OF MY OWN MIND ANYWAYS!

joking aside. I'm going to watch this directors next movies INK and THE FRAME to see if he grew as a Director. He & his producer did a great job of production value.

but really bad acting here lol

11:59 has been named an official selection of The Method Fest in CA.

Congrats Raymond Andrew Bailey and fellow 11:59ers!

The Method Fest is the only major film festival in the U.S. focusing on acting. Named after "The Method" school of acting, the Method Fest takes great pride in being a discovery festival, looking to help launch the works of young fresh filmmakers and to discover breakthrough performances by young, bold new actors.

Screening times will be posted at a later date. Congrats to the Colorado based cast and crew that worked on this project.

It's time...11:59 www.DoubleEdgeFilms.com

The audience for this movie is anyone in the mood for an indie film that's high on plot, and is OK with struggles in dialog and acting. There is some social commentary and questions raised as to the effect media has in influencing the populace, especially during a scandal. Standard conspiracy type stuff but clever enough to make for a good watch. I gave it a 6 because it was compelling despite the weaknesses and made me interested in the imagination of Winans. This is a young filmmaker that shows promise as long as he handles his career well. His next feature is an animation, which I believe will allow him to develop the plot a little more and I could see being a world he is more comfortable in.

OK,i love movies,all kinds: independents, big budgets, internationals. Usually, my rating of movies is similar to the general score of IMDb. But in the case of this movie(and batman rise), i don't agree with the score and i suspect that members and friends of the cast have deliberately writes theses hight score review.

I think the director was more thinking to show off how good he is in all kind of camera work (shaking hidden camera,long camera pose, all camera angles,fast frames shot) then telling a good story.

The movie is a pretentious low budget flick with want to be actors(and a director) with so many big plot holes it could fill a black hole.

Yes, i am frustrate. Not because i just seen a bad movie but because of these people reviews that try to manipulate a score for there own agenda and think they are so smart doing so.....sorry guys, the movie speak from itself so is my score.

i speak french, that will explain my poor writing in English