Antarctic Journal

Funny thing about Antarctic Journal is that it reminds a lot of The last winter which I have seen few weeks ago. There are many similarities... the setting in the arctic desert, a small group of people growing desperate and paranoid, chilly atmosphere, nice pictures, minimalistic score. Just like The last winter this movie looks like its going somewhere, hints at several ghosts, hallucinations or in this case inner fears and then ends up stuck in this endless nothingness. Antarctic Journal is a very slow paced and atmosphere driven movie, spending more time on introducing the characters than going for cheap ghost thrills. After all I think the drawer "horror movie" is plain wrong for the movie, its rather a psychological drama to me. Anyway, the ending to me was just a let down as in last winter, although more consequent. Maybe I didn't quite get the idea behind the movie because the ending is pretty confusing so you don't know whats truth or hallucination. But like another comment here said the movie doesn't leave you with the feeling of wasted time... its calm, far from chilling, rather strangely interesting and keeps your attention till the end. Maybe my rating might be too bad considering this and the nice cinematography but still I was expecting far more from the set up. Judge for yourself.

Slow burning horror with the venerable Song Kang-ho (Thirst, Memories of Murder) as the leader of an expedition to the farthest inland point of the Antarctic. As the weeks of marching across the harsh floes begin to take their psychological toll on the explorers, they start to have doubts about their journey when they find the remains of long dead Norwegian adventurer. In spite of the sameness of the exteriors, shots are framed artfully and establish a creeping dread and isolation that builds to a terrifying, eldritch conclusion. Reminiscent of Gus Van Sant's 2002 desert trek Gerry, by way of Lovecraft.

Director Yim Pil-Sung went on to make an unconventional folk horror film in 2007's Hansel and Gretel, also worth seeing.

Bleak, beautiful, frozen landscapes and Kenji Kawai's commanding score capture our attention right away and portend dire events to come amidst a creeping atmosphere. The screenplay devised between director Yim Pil-sung and co-writers Bong Joon-ho(!) and Lee Hae-jun wastes no time with exposition, instead filling out character details piecemeal while focusing on plot progression. With these things in mind, it's the patient viewer who will get the most out of this movie: while there are sparing instances of acutely unsettling imagery or loud sound, 'Antarctic journal' is happy to tread at a measured pace and let tension and suspense quietly build along with pervasive, chilling ambience and ambiguous mystery.

I think the approach to storytelling and film-making here is somewhat daring simply because of how very restrained and subdued the production is. For all the growing intensity, that darkness is dispensed in the screenplay like a trail of breadcrumbs leading to the conclusion, whether considering the personal and interpersonal struggles, or the suggestion of unnatural happenings. Where there isn't a conscious lack of eventfulness in 'Antarctic journal,' instead there's an effort to downplay the incidents that do transpire, and this intention makes it all the more intriguing - though also somewhat difficult to engage with. This is a tale with strong themes of determination, stubbornness, desperation, and madness - a slow-burn psychological thriller that keeps its duality of horror and heartache at a very low, simmering boil. In that bent, it's both captivating and arduous for the viewer.

I think the technical craft is fine, and the performances of the cast quite good. Yet even the acting of skilled veteran Song Kang-ho is rendered secondary to maintaining the overall bent toward looming unease and disquieting fatefulness. Like the thrust of the narrative and the journey of its expedition, the story marches on regardless of details, and consumes those details in its wake. All told, I don't think this is a movie that would be an easy sell to a wide general audience, as I think the tack it takes requires a certain receptiveness to varied film styles. This is a picture created largely of great nuance in every regard. But any viewer open to hushed, subtle plot development may surely find this a boon.

If my words seem a little vague, consider that an extension of the air the feature puts forth. To be clear, however - if not entirely fulfilling, 'Antarctic journal' is a solid, rewarding viewing experience, and a swell first foray into feature film-making for director Yim. It's not an easily digestible, dramatic thriller, but nor is it intended to be. This isn't going to be to everyone's tastes, but it's well worth checking out wherever you can watch it.

An expedition team led by Choe Do-hyung marches on toward the Antarctic Point of Inaccessibility,one of the most difficult places to reach on the planet Earth and trodden upon only once by a Soviet team in 1958.Min-jae,formally trained in mountain climbing at Switzerland and in awe of the charismatic Do-hyung,is joined by the bookish navigator Young-min,the rather thuggish but sharp communications expert Seong-hoon,the genial cook Geun-chan and the electronics specialist Jae-kyung.When Min-jae discovers an old journal left by a British expedition 80 years ago,he begins to notice odd parallels between the journal entries and his team's experience."Antarctic Journal" is an impressive horror film that slightly resembles "R-Point" and "The Thing".There are some genuinely unnerving moments and Kenji Kawai's score evokes the utterly cold and relentless atmosphere of Antarctica.Unfortunately the film leaves a lot of questions unanswered.Still it gets a solid 8 out of 10 from this viewer.

Antarctic Journal (2005) is a South Korean survival thriller movie written by Bong Joon-ho and it is be far the weakest entry in this man's filmography.

Positives for Antarctic Journal (2005): I'm one of those people who does get a kick out of these survival thriller movies. I think the actors all do a great job with their performances. There are moments filled with tension that I found to be very effective. And finally, the ending was nice.

Negatives for Antarctic Journal (2005): This movie is a bit messy with the execution and a lot of that has to due with Bong Joon-ho not being the director for this movie. There are moments where I dozed off and lost interest in the story. And finally, the movie has some not really good pacing where it was dragging the story in spots.

Overall, Antarctic Journal (2005) is a fine survival thriller movie from South Korea, but it's one of the weaker attempts in that genre for me.