The Mangler Reborn

First Mangler movie is not all bad, typical b horror flick nothing special but not that bad. Second movie was bad but one could tolerate it cause you kind of know what to espect from this sort of films. The Mangler Reborn makes no sense, the plot is rubbish and reminds me of a cheap Saw ripoff. Horror films are scary and suppose to be this one is not the least bit scary in anyway, there are few gruesome scenes that are more of bad taste than anything else. I get the feeling that the whole crew of this movie just went through the motions of making it and put minimum effort into it, there is truly nothing good about this film at all. Evil Dead,Bad Taste and the likes of them are great films that i really enjoy, made with a small budget but Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson made them with there heart and soul. Stay clear of this movie and i have learn my lesson and will stay clear if they make another one.

Third entry in the Mangler series, the original being based on a Stephen King story. A middle-aged man becomes obsessed with the mangling machine, and has to kidnap young women and feed them to it. Most of the running time takes place in the guy's house, this does stifle it somewhat. There is enough gore to keep gorehounds happy, we get a gratuitous female shower scene early on (no doubt intended to stimulate interest), plus a few moments of (unintentional?) humour ("in this world there's only room for one asshole!"). Horror fans may recognise Reggie Bannister from the classic Phantasm, but sadly some of the acting is pretty wooden. Straight to video that serves as an adequate time filler if you are seeking a simple gory, horror flick. But it is nothing more than that.

"The Mangler Reborn" is a million times better than the atrocious and unfortunate "The Mangler 2".

The plot: Hadley (Weston Blakesley) is a repairman. He finds pieces of the mangler machine and puts it together. He grows obsessed about it and starts going on a killing spree to feed the machine. His latest victim Jaime (Aimee Brooks) is trapped in his house. Can she escape before she's another body on the chopping block?

The pacing is slow,but the acting is pretty good. Reggie Bannister makes an appearance as Rick the house robber. In his limited screen time he makes you feel for his character. You can see that the directors really put their heart into the film.

In the end: The movie is scary, and there's some heavy gore scenes. It's worth seeing at least once.

For more insanity, please visit: comeuppancereviews.com

Although it's a par below the classic cult 1995 original movie it's still a worthy addition for the hardcore fans. Robert = freddy is also not to be found in this sequel and all in all this b-movie is slow with many flaws but also good and gory parts that revive in a way the scares of the first film. if u are a fan of the blood-thirsty machine u will get this movie no matter it's an average one. now as to why i say this is the real part 2 the so called MANGLER 2 movie is a sequel in name only and has nothing to do with the original movie plot but this third mangler movie is a direct sequel to the original as it takes like 10 years after the events of the original with the same diabolic machine back in it's bloody work.

If u are not in average horror Stephen king movies adaptions u can skip this one......the rest roll in.

There was absolutely nothing else to rent at the video store so we ended up renting this movie thinking it would be alright. Boy, were we wrong! It was a total waste of time and money. The acting was amateur and the plot had no twists and was not thought out. The "machine" was pathetic. The whole movie basically took place in that house and there could not have been more then 10 people in the cast. It seems like a low budget movie and the special effects were terrible. Most of the movie did not have any music, but when there was, the music was annoying rather then adding suspense.

I would not recommend this movie to anyone.