Six people tell their stories on a single subject - how they got wrongfully convicted to death penalty, but later got exonerated.Six people tell their stories on a single subject - how they got wrongfully convicted to death penalty, but later got exonerated.Six people tell their stories on a single subject - how they got wrongfully convicted to death penalty, but later got exonerated.
- Awards
- 2 nominations total
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
There's an announcement at the start of this tv-movie, but it bears repeating here: every word of dialogue in this movie was taken from interviews, police and court records. Which means that not only are the six stories true, but they're told in as close to a documentary style as possible. In an added truthful layer, the end of the movie shows a small interview with each of the real people. The screenplay, comprised entirely of facts, hit home the message that in the end, the truth will set you free.
In case you haven't figured it out by the synopsis, this is a very upsetting movie. Even though the synopsis tells you that all six people in the story eventually become exonerated, the stories of their arrests, court trials, and time in prison, are heartbreaking. Brian Dennehy's character was wrongfully imprisoned for murdering his parents. Aidan Quinn's character was permanently brutalized while in jail. David Brown Jr.'s character was convicted even though the description of the man who really committed the murder was a white man with long red hair. Delroy Lindo's character also didn't match the description of the real criminal, but he was convicted by an all-white Southern jury despite having an alibi. Susan Sarandon's character was accused of killing a police officer, even though her only crime was incredibly bad judgment. Danny Glover's character was a teenager at the time of the crime he didn't commit, and from police bullying he gave a false confession.
Director Bob Balaban chose a distinctive style for his movie, one that purposely focuses on words rather than theatrics. There are no sets, but instead every actor sits in a little chair and talks to the camera as if they're in an interview. Sometimes ancillary characters like policemen or judges are brought into the little black room, but they perform their "lines" in the same style.
Again, in case you couldn't tell from the synopsis, this movie takes a very strong stance against the death penalty. If you already agree with that message, you'll really take this movie to heart and use it as an argument the next time you clash with someone of the opposing view. If you do believe in the death penalty, it's not a guarantee that this movie will change your mind, but it'll try its very best. I watched this in a group of people with varied opinions, and those who started off believing in capital punishment still did at the end of the movie - but they were not unmoved by the stories and the real people behind them. This is a very emotional movie with some fantastic acting. It's not really possible to enjoy it, but it'll tug on your heart and really make you think. Law and order were established with the very best of intentions, but there have been some absolutely horrifying mistakes and deliberate cruelties done throughout the years. Make sure you have a box of Kleenex in the house before you press 'play'.
In case you haven't figured it out by the synopsis, this is a very upsetting movie. Even though the synopsis tells you that all six people in the story eventually become exonerated, the stories of their arrests, court trials, and time in prison, are heartbreaking. Brian Dennehy's character was wrongfully imprisoned for murdering his parents. Aidan Quinn's character was permanently brutalized while in jail. David Brown Jr.'s character was convicted even though the description of the man who really committed the murder was a white man with long red hair. Delroy Lindo's character also didn't match the description of the real criminal, but he was convicted by an all-white Southern jury despite having an alibi. Susan Sarandon's character was accused of killing a police officer, even though her only crime was incredibly bad judgment. Danny Glover's character was a teenager at the time of the crime he didn't commit, and from police bullying he gave a false confession.
Director Bob Balaban chose a distinctive style for his movie, one that purposely focuses on words rather than theatrics. There are no sets, but instead every actor sits in a little chair and talks to the camera as if they're in an interview. Sometimes ancillary characters like policemen or judges are brought into the little black room, but they perform their "lines" in the same style.
Again, in case you couldn't tell from the synopsis, this movie takes a very strong stance against the death penalty. If you already agree with that message, you'll really take this movie to heart and use it as an argument the next time you clash with someone of the opposing view. If you do believe in the death penalty, it's not a guarantee that this movie will change your mind, but it'll try its very best. I watched this in a group of people with varied opinions, and those who started off believing in capital punishment still did at the end of the movie - but they were not unmoved by the stories and the real people behind them. This is a very emotional movie with some fantastic acting. It's not really possible to enjoy it, but it'll tug on your heart and really make you think. Law and order were established with the very best of intentions, but there have been some absolutely horrifying mistakes and deliberate cruelties done throughout the years. Make sure you have a box of Kleenex in the house before you press 'play'.
Intelligent, mostly well acted filming of the stage play, as 6 people exonerated from death row tell their true stories, mostly as monologues, against a black background.
A powerful argument against the death penalty, it feels a bit stuck between embracing it's theatricality of approach, and trying to work as a more cinematic piece both in the way its shot, the occasional awkward 'flashbacks' and in the 'size' of the performances, which range from understated and small to quite theatrical and presentational.
But whatever questions one might have about the stylistic choices, there's no question that these are powerful, important true stories in that every rarer thing, a dramatized American film that head on addresses an issue with passion and intelligence.
A powerful argument against the death penalty, it feels a bit stuck between embracing it's theatricality of approach, and trying to work as a more cinematic piece both in the way its shot, the occasional awkward 'flashbacks' and in the 'size' of the performances, which range from understated and small to quite theatrical and presentational.
But whatever questions one might have about the stylistic choices, there's no question that these are powerful, important true stories in that every rarer thing, a dramatized American film that head on addresses an issue with passion and intelligence.
This film places the audience as observer to personal interviews with ex-cons whose death row convictions were overturned, therefore they have been released from prison. They describe the circumstances leading to arrest and conviction, and their states of life and mind before they were arrested. It is a biting commentary on the tragic state of racial and socioeconomic policeable inequality and abuse, which then highlights severe failures of the US legal system. It is maddening in its portrayal of police prejudice and ineptitude. There is no riveting plot, instead there is riveting dialog which makes you sit up and listen - then makes you think again about the death penalty. Less involving than traditional story-teller movies like Dead Man Walking or The Life of David Gale, it is no-less impactful and thought- provoking. The stories are tragic. It is a stage-production which is well brought to the big screen, and deserves the larger exposure derived from theatrical/DVD distribution. A fantastic piece of cinematic art.
I'm appalled that anyone would be offended by this movie. It's simply a movie that discusses one topic of the death penalty: INNOCENCE. Regardless of whether or not you are pro or anti death penalty you should be against innocent people being sent to death row and worse to their deaths. I'm in law school and have studied the death penalty in depth. The system in America is flawed and this movie makes that point perfectly. I don't see how anyone can be offended by the truth unless the truth is something you don't want to hear. If you want your eyes opened to some of the major problems with the death penalty, then this movie is right for you. It simply tells the truth about what affect the death penalty can have on innocent people wrongly accused and convicted.
I've just watched this film and I myself write to two inmates in American prisons, one on Death Row (DR) (and he did not commit murder), so this topic of justice v. injustice is one very close to my heart & sensibilities.
What can one say when one hears that someone has spent up to 21 yrs of his/her life for a crime he/she did not commit, and the only way they finally get off DR was from DNA exoneration.
This is a film that all policemen, the judiciary, and school kids should have to see as a matter of course, but actually I reckon all Americans should see - to realise how many innocent lives have been totally ruined or, worse, lost at the electric chair for a crime they never committed. Why, also, does the law not act, when new evidence comes to light, ie why are people not released when they are found to be innocent. What is wrong with people not standing up for the truth? Is it so hard to do? How can these people sleep at night knowing that they have done nothing with evidence that could mean an innocent person could be released? This is totally beyond my understanding! This world is weird and mad! Films such as this one prove it. But this film was also so gentle in its delivery, so lacking in anger, which everyone had every right to be. (I would certainly have been had I been in their shoes.) It was great to see such fine actors taking on a film like this. It certainly added authenticity. An important film for the world to see: that not everyone who goes to prison is guilty! 10/10, from NSW, Australia
What can one say when one hears that someone has spent up to 21 yrs of his/her life for a crime he/she did not commit, and the only way they finally get off DR was from DNA exoneration.
This is a film that all policemen, the judiciary, and school kids should have to see as a matter of course, but actually I reckon all Americans should see - to realise how many innocent lives have been totally ruined or, worse, lost at the electric chair for a crime they never committed. Why, also, does the law not act, when new evidence comes to light, ie why are people not released when they are found to be innocent. What is wrong with people not standing up for the truth? Is it so hard to do? How can these people sleep at night knowing that they have done nothing with evidence that could mean an innocent person could be released? This is totally beyond my understanding! This world is weird and mad! Films such as this one prove it. But this film was also so gentle in its delivery, so lacking in anger, which everyone had every right to be. (I would certainly have been had I been in their shoes.) It was great to see such fine actors taking on a film like this. It certainly added authenticity. An important film for the world to see: that not everyone who goes to prison is guilty! 10/10, from NSW, Australia
Did you know
- TriviaHayes wasn't so innocent after all. Around the time this movie was filmed, Hayes pleaded guilty to manslaughter for the 1987 death of Leslie Dickenson. And as of 2022, retesting from more advanced DNA tests shows that Hayes was likely the killer in this case all along.
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $500,000 (estimated)
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content