The Exonerated

Intelligent, mostly well acted filming of the stage play, as 6 people exonerated from death row tell their true stories, mostly as monologues, against a black background.

A powerful argument against the death penalty, it feels a bit stuck between embracing it's theatricality of approach, and trying to work as a more cinematic piece both in the way its shot, the occasional awkward 'flashbacks' and in the 'size' of the performances, which range from understated and small to quite theatrical and presentational.

But whatever questions one might have about the stylistic choices, there's no question that these are powerful, important true stories in that every rarer thing, a dramatized American film that head on addresses an issue with passion and intelligence.

Unlike some people who have reviewed this title, I found nothing surprising about "The Exonerated." It's an indictment against the death penalty and also for our justice system. In light of some recent jury verdicts, it does seem that there are a few things very goofed up in our system, which is supposed to be the greatest. If it is the greatest, that's pretty sad.

Exonerated tells the stories of six innocent people who received the death penalty. The dialogue comes from the words of the real-life accused. The characters are played by: Brian Dennehy, Susan Sarandon, Aiden Quinn, Danny Glover, Delroy Lindo, with peripheral characters played by Bobby Cannavale, Dennis Burkley, and Chris Bauer, among others. Directed by Bob Balaban, the material was originally a play.

The shocking thing here is, after these people were exonerated, how long it took them to be released. And to think, these are the stories of six people - how many more people have stories like this, and how many died on death row, despite their innocence. It's a staggering thought, and their stories are compelling and sad, stories of wasted years and frustration.

One of the major problems is that many of these people were interrogated for hours and hours and did not ask for a lawyer. And the police are something else in regard to this civil right - if a person asks for an attorney in order to avoid interrogation for hours upon hours, it's assumed he or she is guilty. The public assumes it (well why would you need a lawyer if you didn't have anything to hide?) and the police assume it. First of all, when the police say 'anything you say can and will be used against you,' they mean it. If you talk without an attorney, your words will be twisted to convict you. Secondly, why would someone want to be interrogated for 16 hours or until they are so beaten down and exhausted that they confess?

At the end of the film, we are introduced to the real people. Human beings, victims of police in a hurry to make a case, bad lawyering or no lawyering, bad juries, or being the wrong color. It's a sobering thought.

There's an announcement at the start of this tv-movie, but it bears repeating here: every word of dialogue in this movie was taken from interviews, police and court records. Which means that not only are the six stories true, but they're told in as close to a documentary style as possible. In an added truthful layer, the end of the movie shows a small interview with each of the real people. The screenplay, comprised entirely of facts, hit home the message that in the end, the truth will set you free.

In case you haven't figured it out by the synopsis, this is a very upsetting movie. Even though the synopsis tells you that all six people in the story eventually become exonerated, the stories of their arrests, court trials, and time in prison, are heartbreaking. Brian Dennehy's character was wrongfully imprisoned for murdering his parents. Aidan Quinn's character was permanently brutalized while in jail. David Brown Jr.'s character was convicted even though the description of the man who really committed the murder was a white man with long red hair. Delroy Lindo's character also didn't match the description of the real criminal, but he was convicted by an all-white Southern jury despite having an alibi. Susan Sarandon's character was accused of killing a police officer, even though her only crime was incredibly bad judgment. Danny Glover's character was a teenager at the time of the crime he didn't commit, and from police bullying he gave a false confession.

Director Bob Balaban chose a distinctive style for his movie, one that purposely focuses on words rather than theatrics. There are no sets, but instead every actor sits in a little chair and talks to the camera as if they're in an interview. Sometimes ancillary characters like policemen or judges are brought into the little black room, but they perform their "lines" in the same style.

Again, in case you couldn't tell from the synopsis, this movie takes a very strong stance against the death penalty. If you already agree with that message, you'll really take this movie to heart and use it as an argument the next time you clash with someone of the opposing view. If you do believe in the death penalty, it's not a guarantee that this movie will change your mind, but it'll try its very best. I watched this in a group of people with varied opinions, and those who started off believing in capital punishment still did at the end of the movie - but they were not unmoved by the stories and the real people behind them. This is a very emotional movie with some fantastic acting. It's not really possible to enjoy it, but it'll tug on your heart and really make you think. Law and order were established with the very best of intentions, but there have been some absolutely horrifying mistakes and deliberate cruelties done throughout the years. Make sure you have a box of Kleenex in the house before you press 'play'.

I'm appalled that anyone would be offended by this movie. It's simply a movie that discusses one topic of the death penalty: INNOCENCE. Regardless of whether or not you are pro or anti death penalty you should be against innocent people being sent to death row and worse to their deaths. I'm in law school and have studied the death penalty in depth. The system in America is flawed and this movie makes that point perfectly. I don't see how anyone can be offended by the truth unless the truth is something you don't want to hear. If you want your eyes opened to some of the major problems with the death penalty, then this movie is right for you. It simply tells the truth about what affect the death penalty can have on innocent people wrongly accused and convicted.

I knew before this film that the justice system in the U.S. is far from perfect. and having watched it only reinforced that in my mind. As far as I know, everything that is said in the film is from a transcript of some kind. They are actual words, not inventions of a filmmaker with an agenda. While the filmmaker probably does have an agenda, that doesn't make the ideas and content of the film any less valid.

For me, this film could stand as the entire argument against the death penalty. Punishments are supposed to be about justice. Justice is not a system where six innocent people can be sentenced to die because of purposeful deceit or accidental human error. In reality there have been many more people exonerated from death row, but that doesn't make the argument any stronger. It should only take one death of an innocent to convince any rational person that this punishment is not morally sound.