[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
IMDbPro

Le chemin de la destruction

Original title: Path of Destruction
  • TV Movie
  • 2005
  • Not Rated
  • 2h
IMDb RATING
3.6/10
696
YOUR RATING
Le chemin de la destruction (2005)
ActionAdventureDramaSci-FiThriller

The movie opens with a faulty nanotechnology experiment that results in a massive, deadly explosion. The company's CEO manages to sidestep blame by framing a meddling young reporter (Katheri... Read allThe movie opens with a faulty nanotechnology experiment that results in a massive, deadly explosion. The company's CEO manages to sidestep blame by framing a meddling young reporter (Katherine), who now holds the only surviving evidence needed to expose the truth. All the while, ... Read allThe movie opens with a faulty nanotechnology experiment that results in a massive, deadly explosion. The company's CEO manages to sidestep blame by framing a meddling young reporter (Katherine), who now holds the only surviving evidence needed to expose the truth. All the while, the dangerous nanoparticles - having escaped from the explosion into the stratosphere - th... Read all

  • Director
    • Stephen Furst
  • Writer
    • Chase Parker
  • Stars
    • Danica McKellar
    • David Keith
    • Chris Pratt
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    3.6/10
    696
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Stephen Furst
    • Writer
      • Chase Parker
    • Stars
      • Danica McKellar
      • David Keith
      • Chris Pratt
    • 22User reviews
    • 2Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Photos3

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster

    Top cast16

    Edit
    Danica McKellar
    Danica McKellar
    • Katherine Stern
    David Keith
    David Keith
    • Roy Stark
    Chris Pratt
    Chris Pratt
    • Nathan McCain
    Stephen Furst
    Stephen Furst
    • Terry
    Franklin Dennis Jones
    Franklin Dennis Jones
    • Colonel Thomas Miller
    Richard Wharton
    Richard Wharton
    • Dr. Van Owen
    Ray Baker
    Ray Baker
    Ryan Spike Dauner
    • Lab Coat #1
    Michael Cory Davis
    Michael Cory Davis
    • Eric
    Griff Furst
    Griff Furst
    • Krieger
    • (as Griffith Feuerstein)
    Vladimir Kolev
    • P-17 Pilot
    Jeff Rank
    • Father
    Atanas Srebrev
    Atanas Srebrev
    • Purcell
    Jonas Talkington
    • Mount Weather Tech
    Raicho Vasilev
    • Bodyguard
    Julian Vergov
    Julian Vergov
    • Lab Worker #2
    • Director
      • Stephen Furst
    • Writer
      • Chase Parker
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews22

    3.6696
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    4MartianOctocretr5

    Path of demented plot holes

    Some weird things that look like a swarm of black CGI marks try to take over the world. An accident releases them at some off-shore drilling place which they wreck, and then they wander off to destroy more things.

    Beautiful Danika McKellar is the most memorable part of the movie. Not only is she incredibly cute, but her acting is top notch in spite of the plot-hole ridden script. She's a journalist who happened to be at the site of the first accident, and apparently there's some icky evil government plot behind the creatures, so a bunch of thugs everywhere are after her. There are numerous clichés of this kind thrown around, but there are a few spots of action that almost make sense in this thing.

    The science is whack. The things destroy stuff in ways that are bizarre and inconsistent. The way the heroes try to combat the things is almost comical. If you watch this as a joke in an MST3K sort of way, it can be entertaining on that basis. I just hope Danika gets some better roles in the future.
    3ManiacCop

    If you love bad movies, then is takes the cake

    This movie is hilariously bad. From the very beginning, you know you're in for a gut busting ride of bad script writing, acting, directing and gaping plot holes that boggle the mind. If you enjoy laughing at poorly made tripe, than this is your type of movie. If you want to watch a movie with a somewhat believable plot and some point, then you might want to rent something more mainstream.

    I watched this with my brother last night at 1am on sci fi. We knew what we were getting into. From the absurd dialogue to sheer convenience of certain events, you will get your fair share of 'writing class no-no's'. Anyways, this movie, taken for what it's worth (production value, acting and sheer lunacy), can be tolerated and watched. Once only though. NO ONE has that much time.
    3Aspya

    On the nose

    Most of what I was going to say has already been covered repeatedly. I just had to add the on the nose scenes were too much to bear. For example, a dad trying to get his two sons into nature while they ignored him and played computer games. Seriously you just plonked that there like that without even trying? "Hey we need a hackneyed cliché for this scene do we have any of those in stock?" Lets not try to set a scene, lets just straight up tell the viewer like we're the narrator in a kids play.

    The bad acting, slow deliberate actions and blurting stuff out, it was a waste of time that only Danica made bearable.
    4StediEng

    Eh.

    Poor acting, mediocre CGI and technical ignorance abound in this time filler. Some of the plot points don't hold up to even the barest scrutiny. They draft a bimbo reporter to serve as bombardier when they have an entire base of Air Force personnel to pick from? They push for an EMP bomb over a nuclear blast (the biggest EMP bomb there is, BTW) because radiation is too non-directional like shotgun pellets? Dental braces attract lightning? Come on. And why are molecular disassemblers causing storms and hail anyway? Even the bad acting and video game quality CGI could be tolerated with a little technical competence. The underlying concept is OK but the execution is pretty bad. Trying to guess which eastern European country is substituting for Alaska (and the winner is...... Bulgaria!) was fun. And David Keith and Stephen Furst chew the scenery in amusing if one-note performances. Any time you can completely and totally describe a character with two words, like horny yokel or corporate greedhead, you're in trouble.

    I've watched worse, though. And can't David Keith get any better roles than these second rate Sci-fi channel crapfests? Every month he's in at least one (two this month) of these celluloid WMD's. He used to be somebody. Maybe he figured, "Hell, I'm already in Bulgaria filming Epoch 2, I'll just knock another one off while I'm over here". Maybe the beer's cheap. Who knows.
    5bobwildhorror

    Sci Fi Channel Does It Again

    Okay, okay...I know my summary says it all. Another Sci Fi Channel "original." Well, wait just a minute folks; this one actually seems to have a grain of originality.

    I'm afraid the nanotechnology concept is where it ends, though. Bad acting. Horrible CGI. Ridiculous plot twists. Starring Winnie and directed by Flounder.

    But this one is so horribly bad, folks, that it's entertaining. We're not talking PLAN 9 bad, but pretty close. Another reviewer indicated that this may have been intentional, but I'm not buying it. For those of you that enjoy this kind of thing, buy some beer, turn off your mind, relax and float down stream.

    More like this

    The Extreme Team
    3.4
    The Extreme Team
    Walk the Talk
    5.7
    Walk the Talk
    Cursed Part 3
    6.0
    Cursed Part 3
    Saucisses à tout prix
    4.2
    Saucisses à tout prix
    Les associées
    6.2
    Les associées
    The Perfect Pant from Open to Close
    The Perfect Pant from Open to Close
    Strangers with Candy
    5.9
    Strangers with Candy
    Deep in the Valley
    4.4
    Deep in the Valley
    Timms Valley
    6.4
    Timms Valley
    7.7
    Mr. Payback
    The Multi-Hyphenate
    3.6
    The Multi-Hyphenate
    Everwood
    7.5
    Everwood

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Goofs
      Blackhawk helicopters have a main rotor and a tail rotor. They require both rotors to fly. The helicopter pilot states that the helicopter lost one of its rotors; yet the aircraft continues flying.

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • September 24, 2005 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Death Cloud
    • Filming locations
      • Seattle, Washington, USA
    • Production companies
      • Armored Productions
      • BUFO
      • Curmudgeon Films
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $1,800,000 (estimated)
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 2h(120 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Stereo
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.